User talk:FORNEVERWIKI

February 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. WWGB (talk) 13:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Charlotte Dawson, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Charlotte Dawson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Theroadislong (talk) 13:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 14:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

unblock Wrongly blocked on false grounds of disruptive editing/abuse of editing privileges following the as yet unsubstantiated publications by others on cause of death. No official confirmation from coroner on Charlotte Dawson's death has been made. Cause of death cannot and should not be determined nor published by unqualified persons. FORNEVERWIKI 0309, 23 February 2014 (AEDT)
 * Wikipedia reports what reliable sources say. This reference http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/charlotte-dawson-found-dead-20140222-338j6.html supports suicide as the cause. Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)