User talk:FOSBusters

Welcome!
Hello, FOSBusters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Yann (talk) 10:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

We need to talk
We need to talk about your edits to make them fit with Wikipedia policy. For transparency's sake, it would be best to use the article talk page. This is not something that is going to get fixed by edit-warring, and it's in your interests to present your views as soon as possible. Cheers. --Pete (talk) 23:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

What do you want? Is that a threat saying it is in my interests to present my views? On What? You deleted everything contributed even where sourced it was sourced and questioned sources even where credible. I am not interested in edit wars at all. If you want to delete people's contributions that is your choice but I think it is oppressive. You can just edit it to make it fit the policy directly; if it is too onerous or the content is worthless just delete it and be oppressive. But a great deal of the content is quality in my opinion and well sourced, indeed reasonable. It is disappointing that you deleted the criticisms section; silencing what was basically an amalgam of dissenting opinions; you could have just balanced it out. Perhaps we could just have one line that says, "sometimes FOS has criticisms". Otherwise tell me a simple method to bring in line with the policy. Your language is highly exclusionary, "we don't" etc. I thought Wikipedia was an inclusive force enabling people. Up to you but I am not really interested in being lectured.


 * Good. Let's discuss the article on the article talk page so that other editors can contribute. Thanks. --Pete (talk) 01:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

No thanks. Keep your deletions. I don't believe my input will be valued. Oppress opinion as you wish.

You need to actually read the content Skyring. Clearly there are references. There are clearly references you just dont look genuine when you delete something that clearly does have references. If you need help digesting sources then thats okay. But blanket deletions tend to just cover things up. I am sure you are all about transparency not cover ups right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.128.82.5 (talk) 08:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Financial Ombudsman Service (Australia) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. $(talk to me) (contributions)$ @ 01:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, apparently if things are not sourced we should delete them. Nothing was sourced. Please see recent deletions by Skyring for example. FOSBusters (talk) 01:51, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

DS alert american politics
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Just an FYI... I sent one to myself also. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * thanks for this, please revert my edits if possible. I should have confined to the talk page. Just wanted to make a suggestion.
 * No prob... these things are FYI in nature and I'm passing them out to everyone, or at least trying for every one, who shows up at the Occupation related pages more than once.  You can hand 'em out to if you are so inclined.  By definition they are no fault and FYI in nature.  Carry on!  NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 08:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bitcoin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Block chain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Banker's Association (September 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Australian Banker's Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Australian_Banker%27s_Association Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abdullah_Alam&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Australian_Banker%27s_Association reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Australian Banker's Association (October 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JJBers was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Australian Banker's Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Australian_Banker%27s_Association Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JJBers&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Australian_Banker%27s_Association reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&mdash; JJBers (talk) 02:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Australian Banker's Association


Hello, FOSBusters. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Australian Banker's Association".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 13:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)