User talk:FPGT24

Ford Probe picture
Are you going to add the picture to the Ford Probe page?--Dana60Cummins (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

What picture? FPGT24 (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Probesplash1.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Probesplash1.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 22:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Incorrect changes in Probe article
Why did you change the date of commencement for design development of the second generation Probe to 1991? Are you aware that a mass production vehicle cannot be started and completed in less than 18-24 months before production starts and usually needs an investment of several months on design work? It does NOT make sense why you changed that, when the Mazda MX-6 was fully designed by 1990 as was the Probe. Patents from October 1990 prove that. By 1991, obviously development was well underway and prototypes were in testing scheduled for release in 1992. Please do not make edits that are glaringly incorrect, especially concerning dated matter.Carmaker1 (talk) 05:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Nothing was changed. I added that. I did the entire 2nd generation article with all correct information, a few mistakes should be expected, and all edits were done in good faith. Design date for 1993-1997 generation "1991" was pulled from the website Performance Probe. FPGT24 (talk) 03:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:96ProbeGT.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:94ProbeGTinterior.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:97ProbeGTinterior.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:97ProbeGTS.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:96ProbeGTinterior.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:93ProbeGT.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:93ProbeGTinterior.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:94ProbeGT.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:97ProbeGT.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:14, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Another one of your uploads, File:95ProbeGTinterior.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Kill the Lights - current single
I've undid your recent edit because, unless you know something I (and others) don't know, Hunting and Fishing is still the current single. If you continue to remove it without sourcing it, or at least answering the question that has been asked, someone is going to take action against you which may impede your ability to do future edits. - it won't be me. I don't know how to do that, lol. But there's always someone.Greysepia (talk) 12:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't care, because I can verify that it is NOT the current single. When a song complete's its run on the Billboard Country Airplay chart, it is no longer the current single. I have been editing singles on wikipedia for quite some time and this is the first time I've had trouble with people disputing my edits. Go look at Mediabase country chart, Billboard country update, Billboard Country airplay, and Country Aircheck, all of them show "Huntin, Fishin & Lovin Everyday" as a song that has COMPLETED it's radio run on the charts, therefore NOT making it a current single. Bryan's label is getting ready to release his next single, likely off the new EP due in August.FPGT24 (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * fair enough.Greysepia (talk) 22:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Probesplash.jpg


The file File:Probesplash.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * unused personal photo

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)