User talk:FRANCISBONNICI

July 2019
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Edward Banayoti, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png located above the edit window.

Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Edward Banayoti. Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)


 * ,, my dear uncle pointed out there was significant IP disruption as well, and the duck quacks loudly through edit summaries. You can see a list in this section. Drmies (talk) 14:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request #whatever

 * Hi. I am the OTRS agent you have been conversing with lately.
 * Do you agree to refrain from editing the Edward Banayoti article, and instead restrict your activity related to that subject to the talk page? If so, please amend your appeal accordingly, and I can support unblocking you. If you are the subject of that article, you have a conflict of interest, and should not edit it directly, but instead suggest changes on the talk page.
 * You should also understand that you have no dispute with Bbb23. He is simply an administrator doing his job to prevent disruption to Wikipedia, and in doing so he reverted the deletions you did. I would have done the same; an administrator is not concerned with content disputes, our job is to maintain stability of the Wikipedia project. If reverting disruptive blanking of well-sourced material doesn't restore stability, then blocking users or protecting the article is the next recourse. Bbb23 doesn't appear to have made any significant content contributions to that article. The editors to whom you should be making your points are those who participate on the article's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I am not the blocking administrator ( is), but I oppose an unblock of this user no matter what they agree to. First, even if they restrict themselves to the Talk page, they are simply going to stridently post the same walls of text they've posted here and other places, none of which is reasonable. Second, they say that they specifically want to "convince" me of the legitimacy of their changes. I have zero desire to talk to this user, now or in the future.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * What Bbb says. I cannot possibly see how this editor is even aware of what we are and what we do, or that they have any interest in improving the project by editing according to guidelines. Drmies (talk) 18:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If the user agrees to edit requests to make specific changes "Change X to Y" with supporting sources, instead of posting walls of text that nobody will read, I would unblock this user. Otherwise we have the subject of an article who has legitimate WP:BLP concerns but is stuck with no way to address them... and OTRS will not get involved in content disputes. He his here making unblock requests because I suggested it. I made a surgical edit to the lead, inserting "allegedly" in one sentence to avoid WP:SYNTHESIS after examining the cited sources, and I commented on the talk page, but that should be the extent of my involvement.
 * I suggest, if you cannot currently support an unblock, please state the conditions under which an unblock would be acceptable. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:19, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * How are the subject's BLP concerns "legitimate"? As far as I'm concerned, the community is able to handle any possible BLP violations in the usual way. We are not required to permit the subject to edit Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * BTW, has the editor proved to OTRS that they are Banayoti?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Anachronist, I'll deviate from a bit, being more liberal than they are--I could agree with that, always keeping WP:ROPE in mind. But they'd have to be short, sourced, to the point, etc. Drmies (talk) 22:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Then again, reading over that unblock request again..."by not allowing me...character assassination...": that rope would have to be very short. Drmies (talk) 22:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)