User talk:FULBERT/Archive 88

Week 7/ Assignment 7/ Gdaymate011
1. I Added some content about the first opium war and the second opium war, I'm very interested in the history of this period because this period of history has a huge impact on the reform of modern China.

2. First Opium War: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Opium_War&type=revision&diff=1057660511&oldid=1057557514 second opium war: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Opium_War&type=revision&diff=1058824085&oldid=1058078566

3. By doing this assignment, I realized this is a very interesting thing to supplement the content of the article. It can help others understand the content of the article better.Gdaymate011 (talk) 06:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Both of these edits were too close to their original sources; restate what you added to both in your own words and ping me here again and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)


 * FULBERT Gdaymate011 (talk) 22:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , The second one was reverted as it was not from a credible source. Please add something to that article from one or locate an additional article to edit. Ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 05:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * User:FULBERT Fixed Assignment Gdaymate011 (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Current with Week 7. FULBERT (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 8/ Assignment 8/ Gdaymate011
1. During the outbreak, The surge in U.S. stocks has been accompanied by a surge in cryptocurrencies. Two of the most famous are Bitcoin and Dogecoin. I've been involved in buying cryptocurrencies myself, so I'd like to supplement this article with more detail.

2.Cryptocurrency: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cryptocurrency&type=revision&diff=1058825122&oldid=1058671207 Dogecoin: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dogecoin&type=revision&diff=1058826636&oldid=1058761730

3. When I was doing this assignment, I realized that it made me very happy to make an article more perfect with my own knowledge and understanding.Gdaymate011 (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Both of these edits were too close to their original sources; restate what you added to both in your own words and ping me here again and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 17:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)


 * FULBERT Gdaymate011 (talk) 23:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , I would ordinarily revert your edit with a message similar to: "The source used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE." Please find and cite more reliable sources and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 05:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * FULBERT Fixed Assignment Gdaymate011 (talk) 20:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Current with Week 8. FULBERT (talk) 18:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 9/ Assignment 9/ Gdaymate011
1. I added a few things about the development and history of the game industry because they are so important to the development of the game industry today.

2. Video game: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Video_game&type=revision&diff=1058828609&oldid=1058054672 video game industry: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Video_game_industry&type=revision&diff=1058827523&oldid=1058448135

3. during this progress, I found that a lot of Wikipedia literature is not enough about historical development.

4. Through this semester's Wikipedia editing training, I incidentally read a lot of different articles in a variety of fields. At the same time, I am very happy to improve an article through my own contribution so as to benefit more people. In the future, I will keep editing Wikipedia articles as a hobby in my daily life.Gdaymate011 (talk) 05:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , The sources used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite more reliable sources and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 05:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Fixed Assignment FULBERT Gdaymate011 (talk) 20:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for sharing this and now current with Week 9. FULBERT (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week5 / Assignment5 / Damonmand
1. I am working on an article about Fantasy Westward Journey, which is one of the most famous vedio game in China the new citation I added is the additional event information about what happen in 2006,This will give more details for it. 2. The Link of Diff： https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fantasy_Westward_Journey&diff=1058835822&oldid=1058835667 3. Even I already know a lot about the topic that I pick, but this process help me understanding more details.Damonmand (talk) 22:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 02:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Hi professor, I assign all my articles, please check. thank you Damonmand (talk) 04:29, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , The source used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite a more reliable source and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 05:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Hi, professor, I changed reliable sources and upgrade my Link of diff for assignment 5,6,7, please check, and I did not see your comment for my assignment 8 and 9, is that means I pass for these two?Damonmand (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Nicely improved. Current for Week 5. FULBERT (talk) 18:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week7 / Assignment7 / Damonmand
1. In this article, I chose my hometown region. and in the language introduction part has some "citation needed" marks, so I added the corresponding citation. This is my diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaoshan&diff=1058840018&oldid=1058838137

2. I chose Fujian which is a region that has many relationships with my hometown. And I found that on the introduction of Wuyi tea has no citation on it, so I add it. This is my diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fujian&diff=1058842610&oldid=1058840996 Regarding this study, I figure out that many people like me are helping Wikipedia to complete different articles, many articles have "citation needed" marks and I would like to help with that.Damonmand (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 02:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The sources used here do not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite more reliable sources and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 05:18, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * These are now current. Week 7 is done. FULBERT (talk) 19:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week8 / assignment 8/ sunnydayreading
Hi, The first article is Eutrophication. I found a citation from Oxford Academic that explain Nettles and thorn bushes can be turn into Forest undergrowth. Here is a link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eutrophication&diff=1057690057&oldid=1054196315. The second article is Dead Zone. I add a citation for this article shows that the algal bloom is a phenomenon of phytoplankton growth. Here is a link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dead_zone_(ecology)&diff=1057691518&oldid=1055605656. I learned a lot through this activity. Similar with our research proposal, every statement needs an evidence to support. And each support should be authentic. Best, Sunnydayreading (talk) 02:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Per the assignment, "also include a sentence or two to express your contribution in context and demonstrate how it adds to the knowledge in the article." Ping me here when you add this and I will review it. FULBERT (talk) 04:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , thanks for your reply. The article Eutrophication mentioned that the forest undergrowth caused by Nettles and thorn bushes. However, I found this statement has not cicitation. And a note from other editor said that need a furture citation to support it. Therefore, I found an peer reviewed article to support this statement.

For the second article Deadzoom, the article claims that algal bloom is a phenomenon of phytoplankton growth. Similar with the article Eutrophication, it also had a tag from other editors which requiring further reference to support it. So, I added a peer reviewed article to support it. Sunnydayreading (talk) 07:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Those are fine places for citations, though this assignment requires you to add one to two sentences each in addition to the citation. Please ping me when done. FULBERT (talk) 14:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * 1) Added a further explanation to the runoff of undergrowth : terrestrial plants have high nitrogen requirements. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eutrophication&type=revision&diff=1058838242&oldid=1057690057 2) I added explaination why Bacillus and Nocardia can degrade PET. Because the PET can be esterases by Bacillus and Nocardia. And Esterase is an enzyme family that able to cleave the ester bond. Diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Polyethylene_terephthalate&type=revision&diff=1058840114&oldid=1057659297   Thanks! Sunnydayreading (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Current with Week 8. FULBERT (talk) 19:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week9 / assignment 9/ sunnydayreading
Hi, The first article is Conus textile. The article mentioned Conus textile will stinging human, and several human deaths based on this attribute. I added a citation to support this idea. Here is link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conus_textile&diff=1057698157&oldid=1054733046. The second article is Low-density polyethylene. There is a footnote showing that a citation needs to be improve. So, I found a journal article from the ScienceDirect. Here is a link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Low-density_polyethylene&diff=1057706288&oldid=1053243851. After this activity, I have learned to review the citation. We need to keep our citation most current and authentic.

Reflection: I really enjoy this extra credit activity overall. This is a great opportunity for me to read and learn. Even contribute to the field that I spend whole semester to do the research. I have how to insert picture and citation in the Wikipedia. And I also realize the importance of evaluate the citation. Although this is my first time to edit Wikipedia. However, I will continue to contribute my effort supporting the Wikipedia. I feel a sense of achievement from these extra credit assignments.

Sincerely Sunnydayreading (talk) 05:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Per the assignment, "also include a sentence or two to express your contribution in context and demonstrate how it adds to the knowledge in the article." Ping me here when you add this and I will review it. FULBERT (talk) 04:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , For the first article,Conus textile, this is a B grade article. Several human deaths have been attributed to Conus textile. I added a citation from the nature footgae which has a detailed description for Conus textile's attributed, and relative death records. This citation improved credit of this article and proved the dangerous attributed of Conus textile. The second article, Low-density polyethylene, this also a B grade article. The orignal citation is a chemical article from the a website. There is a tag from other editor suggesting that one of citation is clearly bogus.I found a citation from the Science Direct, which is also a peer review article. The thrustworth citation can make this article more reliable. Sunnydayreading (talk) 08:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Add the sentence or two to the article itself. FULBERT (talk) 17:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for your reply. 1) I add the Habitat of Cnus textile based on the information from a peer review article. And added the statiscs number of human injury due to the CONUS textile. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conus_textile&type=revision&diff=1058842617&oldid=1057698157

2) For the second article, Low-density Polyethylene, I made improvement based on its real life applications. Here is a link diff to show my current work and previous work: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Low-density_polyethylene&type=revision&diff=1058846092&oldid=1057706288 . Best, Sunnydayreading (talk) 23:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this and for adding those final edits. FULBERT (talk) 19:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 9/ Assignment 9 / Baezoey
1.I chose one article in my interested topic : Honor of Kings. It is one of the famous mobile games in China. In the Overview part there are some information missed, so I add one citation to help it explain better. I also chose one of the beautiful cities in China which is Chaozhou, and it lack of the citation of the culture.

2. Link to the Diff：[Honor of Kings] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Honor_of_Kings&diff=1057702129&oldid=1057701120 [Chaozhou] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaozhou&diff=1057702776&oldid=1048065971

3. Honor of Kings is the most popular mobile game in China. So I want to add information about it for people who might be interested in this game. I did not expect that an article about a game that has been popular in China for many years is still a Start level on Wikipedia.Baezoey (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Professor, I have assign these articles to myself. Please check. Thank you!Baezoey (talk) 07:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Per the assignment, please add a sentence or two to each of your edits so we see what you are adding from your citations. Ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 05:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Hi Professor. I have edited my changes. Here is the link to diff: Honor of Kings https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Honor_of_Kings&diff=1058837360&oldid=1057702129, Chaozhou https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaozhou&diff=1058838819&oldid=1057884527 Please check.Baezoey (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Good enough for now, though Brittanica, another encyclopedia, is not generally the best resource to use. FULBERT (talk) 19:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 8/ Assignment 8 / Baezoey
1. I chose a special city in China which is called Bozhouand I found that the introduction about Tranditional medicine market need citation to prove, so I added the corresponding citation. Another article I chose is about a beautiful small cities in China which is Jieyang, and it lack of the citation of the history.

2. Link to the diff:[Bozhou] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bozhou&diff=1057701747&oldid=1057701306 [Jieyang] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jieyang&diff=1057701515&oldid=1057701391

3. I found that many Chinese cities do not have detailed descriptions that are backed by sources on Wikipedia. I want to work in this area and try to let more people know about Chinese cities.Baezoey (talk) 05:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Professor, I have assign these articles to myself. Please check. Thank you!Baezoey (talk) 07:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Per the assignment, please add a sentence or two to each of your edits so we see what you are adding from your citations. Ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 05:21, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Hi Professor. Here is the link to the diff: Bozhou https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bozhou&diff=1058841466&oldid=1057882339, Jieyang https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jieyang&diff=1058845291&oldid=1057884532 Please Check.Baezoey (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Also good enough for now, though not really the highest levels of evidence you identified for these. Current with Week 8. FULBERT (talk) 19:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 9/ Assignment 9/ Cloi929
1. I pick a Eames Lounge Chair image to the MillerKnoll article. I think this is a very famous chair, and it has changed the way people live. And it became an icon of American design. I can see it in almost furniture store in New York. So I think it is important to add a photo of this chair. 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MillerKnoll&diff=1058855654&oldid=1055095022 3. When I checked this article by MillerKnoll, I thought there must be a picture of this chair. In fact no. This surprised me. This chair that changed people's way of life did not appear in Wikipedia. It is so classic. I also went to understand why this chair is so famous and what's so good about it. 4. My sense of experience is good, not only can help other people, but also enrich my own knowledge. I think I will continue to do it. This gives me a sense of accomplishment, whenever I see that my article views are increasing.Cloi929 (talk) 00:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Nice reflection and image added to your article. Current with Week 9. FULBERT (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 5 / Assignment 5 / RaymondZqiu
This is Raymond. Here is my assignment 5. 1. I am interested in artificial intelligence technology, so I chose NIO, one of the electronic automobile manufacturers, as my article. Here is the link to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIO_(car_company) 2. I add the award NIO won in 2021 and the source is from NIO's official website. Here is the diff page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NIO_%28car_company%29&type=revision&diff=1057963726&oldid=1055281422 3. In this homework, I found that a lot of topics are still not properly updated.--RaymondZqiu (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , The source used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite a more reliable source and then ping me again here when done. Ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * FULBERTI have made another citation on this article. Here is the diff page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NIO_%28car_company%29&type=revision&diff=1058880796&oldid=1058286905 Thank you so much.--RaymondZqiu (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Current with Week 5. FULBERT (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

week9/assignment 9/ Amber MWY

 * 1) The articles are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WeChat. I added an institution for the first one. I added the knowledge of life for the second one.
 * 2) dif https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_media&type=revision&diff=1057588644&oldid=1057535479. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WeChat&type=revision&diff=1057591850&oldid=1055904806
 * 3) Everyone can edit Wikipedia. when we read it, we need to know which one is correct or not.
 * 4) I will edit Wikipedia when I know something interesting like knowledge of life or interesting experience that can help people to learn something.--Amber MWY (talk) 15:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , The first citation does not add content of value and the second did not include a citation. Please revise them and ping me here and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 04:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , first dif: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_media&type=revision&diff=1058724093&oldid=1058551708. second dif:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WeChat&type=revision&diff=1058727000&oldid=1057605676--Amber MWY (talk) 06:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Wikipedia cannot be a source for itself, so that first one is not reliable. The second refers to a blog, which is also not reliable. Please revise them both and ping me here. FULBERT (talk) 14:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , the first link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_media&type=revision&diff=1058771954&oldid=1058551708. the second link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WeChat&type=revision&diff=1058773270&oldid=1058744356.--Amber MWY (talk) 14:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Neither of these are credible or reliable sites. Use sources similar to what we use in class from the business databases. FULBERT (talk) 17:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , the first link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_media&type=revision&diff=1058889285&oldid=1058771954. the second one: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WeChat&type=revision&diff=1058890566&oldid=1058773270.--Amber MWY (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , I agree with the other editor who removed one of your additions, though the other is fine. Given the timing, Week 9 is current. FULBERT (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Hòa Hảo&#32; on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 11:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Week5 / assignment 5/ sunnydayreading
Hi,

The Agenda 21 is a C level article still with room for improvement. I found a sentence under support section still needs citation to support: In the absence of a multi-sectoral consensus on how to achieve sustainable development in the United States, the PCSD was conceived to formulate recommendations for the implementation of Agenda 21 (Agenda 21, Wikipedia). In order to support it, I went through the Agdenda 21 and PCSD documents. Here is a link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agenda_21&type=revision&diff=1056831619&oldid=1054064900 I learned the importance of ciatation. Citation is a way to give credit to the writers from whom you have borrowed words and ideas.

Thanks

Sunnydayreading (talk) 21:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Per the assignment, "also include a sentence or two to express your contribution in context and demonstrate how it adds to the knowledge in the article." Ping me here when you add this and I will review it. FULBERT (talk) 04:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , there is a statement about USA PCSD's movemnet towarding the Agenda 21. However, there is no evidence to support it. I found two citations that proved the author's idea. Both of them are from the offical website. The frist citation is from the USA PCSD, and second citation is from the United nations. These two ciatation provide the idea/statement is from a correct source. Sunnydayreading (talk) 08:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Add a sentence or two to the article itself describing your contribution and extracting the idea from the citation. FULBERT (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , I specified 10 common goals toward Agenda 21 by the PCSD in the article. Here is a diff link based on my previous edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agenda_21&type=revision&diff=1058833533&oldid=1057841130 Sunnydayreading (talk) 21:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Week 5 is now complete. --- FULBERT (talk) 12:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Week7 / assignment 7/ sunnydayreading
Hi, The first article is Green Chemistry, a B grade article. I found a book from Taylor & Francis Group, Impact of Nano-materials on Health and Environment, to prove the necessity of impact consideration on the Nano-materials. Here is a link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Green_chemistry&diff=1057666635&oldid=1049550564 The second article is Clothing Industry, also a B grade article. I found two articles through the NYU database to show a trend of sustainable model in the clothing industry. Here is a link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clothing_industry&diff=1057669717&oldid=1055299711 Green Marketing is my research topic. I gained a better understanding on green product and materials. This a very good experience for me to add these citations for the article which is related to my research proposal.

Best, Sunnydayreading (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Per the assignment, "also include a sentence or two to express your contribution in context and demonstrate how it adds to the knowledge in the article." Ping me here when you add this and I will review it. FULBERT (talk) 04:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , 1) There is a statement suggesting the necessity of impact consideration on the Nano-materials. Because the nano materials will have impact on the environment and human health. However, there is no citation for that statement. I found an article from the Taylor & Francis Group that suggesting the Nano materials will have an impact on the environment and human health. The citation show readers this idea/statement is valid.

2) One of the editor made a statement that the clothing industry has grown to an eco-friendly packaging solution to limit the amount of waste. For the second article, the statement also has no citation to support. I also saw that someone made a tag to reuqire citation to support it. I did a lot of study based on green clothing industry. I found two citations to suopoort it. The first ciatation is from mckinsey, they published a report from their director, announced that the clothing industry is moving to green packing solution with some statistic information. And Second citation is from the ScienceDirect. The second citation introduced a trend in apparel industry to adopt sustainable packing. These two citation serves as a fact-checking tool that help reader to verify the accuracy of statement. Sunnydayreading (talk) 08:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Include this within the article not here. FULBERT (talk) 17:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , For the first article, I added some real example of aspects to think about issues associated with nanomaterials. Diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Green_chemistry&type=revision&diff=1058835145&oldid=1057666635

For the second article, I added regulations of packing waste from China, the U.S and Canada to support the statment of green packing. Diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clothing_industry&type=revision&diff=1058836466&oldid=1057669717 Sunnydayreading (talk) 22:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Week 7 is now current. FULBERT (talk) 12:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 9/ Assignment 9/ Crazytoppp
1.DJI、is a technology company that I like very much. I added the news in November 2015, DJI announced the establishment of a strategic partnership with Hasselblad. 2. DIFF:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DJI&diff=1058879037&oldid=1056630682 3.I found that some information on the wiki is not very credible. For example, there is no official report about DJI’s acquisition of a majority stake in Hasselblad, only some leaked news. 4.I learned a lot from the extra credit of the WIKI. Not only know how to contribute to the WIKI and publish my own edits, but also I often browse the WIKI and read the knowledge I am interested in. I'm sure I will open and edit the WIKI in the future.Crazytoppp (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Crazytoppp (talk) 13:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)---Crazytoppp (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Crazytoppp Please assign yourself this article in the dashboard and then ping me here again and I will review. --- FULBERT (talk) 19:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Week6 / assignment 6/ RickyLiao
1. I chose the theater in my hometown: Guangzhou Opera House, and added citation.Here is the article link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guangzhou_Opera_House 2. I found that one piece of information about China’s three major theaters lacks a clear citation, so I added citation, which is the diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guangzhou_Opera_House&type=revision&diff= 1057620899&oldid=1011081754 3. Like the previous assignment, I realized that all information needs to be more rigorous and provide corresponding ciatation. This is the reason why wikipedia is authoritative and convincing. RickyLiao1997 (talk) 18:28, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , The source used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite a more reliable source such as the ones we used in our course and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 05:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Dear Professor, I have find another source for the article, here is the diff link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guangzhou_Opera_House&type=revision&diff=1059506949&oldid=1057620899RickyLiao1997 (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Current with Week 6.

Week6 / Assignment6 / Damonmand
1.Genshin Impact is one of the famous mobile games in the world, many people from different countries love to play it. In the Controversies part there is some information missed, so I add one citation to help it explain better. 2. The Link of Diff： https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genshin_Impact&diff=1058837285&oldid=1058173892 3. It is not hard to see that some information already had citations but that citations are not enough to help explainning what really happen for the event.Damonmand (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 02:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The source used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite a more reliable source and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 05:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Improved sources. Current with Week 6. FULBERT (talk) 18:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Current for Week 6. FULBERT (talk) 01:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 8/ Assignment 8/ RickyLiao
1. In this article, I chose my favorite video site bilibili. I found that the objective description about him lacked due citation, so I added the corresponding citation. This is the article’s link: https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilibili, here is my diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bilibili&type=revision&diff=1057627153&oldid=1056797380

2. I chose my favorite Taiwanese singer Wei Li'an. About his album, the corresponding citation was missing, so I added the album-related citation. This is the article link: https://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/William_Wei, this is my diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Wei&type=revision&diff=1057628202&oldid=1057386443

Regarding this study, I truly realized the importance of citation. After many edits, I learned the rigor of popular science content.RickyLiao1997 (talk) 19:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , The sources used here do not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite more reliable sources such as the ones we used in our course and then ping me again here when done. Additionally, please add a sentence or two of your own contributions in addition to citing a source. FULBERT (talk) 05:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ,Dear Professor,I have find another two sources for the two article,and add my own contributions to the 2 articles, diff link1:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bilibili&type=revision&diff=1059511342&oldid=1058479982, diff link2:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Wei&type=revision&diff=1059512725&oldid=1057628202RickyLiao1997 (talk) 22:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Current with Week 8. FULBERT (talk) 01:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Week7 / assignment 7/ RickyLiao
1. In this article, I chose my favorite Korean e-sports player Faker. I found that his mvp information about the 2016 World Finals lacked citation, so I edited this article. Here is the link to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faker_(gamer); this is the edited diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faker_%28gamer%29&type=revision&diff= 1057622830&oldid=1054006892 2. In the second article, I chose my favorite e-sports team FPX. I found that the information about their 2017 Demacia Cup lacks citation, so I added ciation. This is the link to the article: https://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/FunPlus_Phoenix, this is the edited diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FunPlus_Phoenix&type=revision&diff=1057623819&oldid=1056418158

In this homework, I found that a lot of wikipedia information actually lacks the proper citation, which makes many articles lack the persuasive power, so improving these articles will make me feel very fulfilled.RickyLiao1997 (talk) 18:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , The sources used here do not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite more reliable sources such as the ones we used in our course and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 05:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ,Dear Professor,I have find another two sources for the two article, diff link1: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faker_%28gamer%29&type=revision&diff=1059509610&oldid=1057622830, diff link2:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FunPlus_Phoenix&type=revision&diff=1059510111&oldid=1058524799RickyLiao1997 (talk) 21:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Current with Week 7. --- FULBERT (talk) 01:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Week5 / assignment 5/ RickyLiao
1. I am working on the article, it talks about one of my favoutite E-gammer:clearlove,here is link of the article:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearlove 2: For the information about his returning on 2020, it lacked citation, so I added the citation to this, and here is the deff of the article:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clearlove&type=revision&diff=1057619448&oldid=1023159124 3. I have learned that, for wikipedia, everything you edit need to be serious and have post the citation, so as to make your article convincing. RickyLiao1997 (talk) 18:27, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , The source used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE. Please find and cite a more reliable source such as the ones we used in our course and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 05:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Dear Professor, I have find another source for the article, here is the diff link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clearlove&type=revision&diff=1059504646&oldid=1058468880RickyLiao1997 (talk) 21:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Not the most reliable or credible source, but good enough for now. Current with Week 5. FULBERT (talk) 01:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Christianization of the Roman Empire&#32; on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 06:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

week7/assignment 7/ Amber MWY

 * 1) The article is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_mainland_China. I added a citation for the definition of COVID-19 and the effect of COVID-19. another one is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_as_a_service. I added an example for this.
 * 2) Dif link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_mainland_China&type=revision&diff=1057098960&oldid=1057071763.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_as_a_service&type=revision&diff=1057575460&oldid=1057244672
 * 3) The impact of COVID-19 has affected the world. Although the epidemic is now under control, there are still potential dangers, and we still need to take precautions. When outputting your own opinions, you need to use data and evidence to demonstrate.--Amber MWY (talk) 13:12, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , Please review the assignment for this week as it involves editing 2 articles. Add that as a reply to here and ping me again and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , I added it.--Amber MWY (talk) 12:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , I would ordinarily revert your edit with a message similar to: "The source used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE." Please find and cite a more reliable source and then ping me again here when done. FULBERT (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , I edited it again. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_as_a_service&type=revision&diff=1058722546&oldid=1058382382--Amber MWY (talk) 05:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yes, though it needs a more credible and reliable source. Using the vendor's own documentation does not meet this criterion. Ping me here when you add a more reliable source. FULBERT (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ,sure, Thank you for explaining.dif link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=Software_as_a_service&type=revision&diff=1058770354&oldid=1058382382--Amber MWY (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , This url of the diff does not work. FULBERT (talk) 17:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ,doe it work?dif link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_as_a_service&type=revision&diff=1058770354&oldid=1058722546--Amber MWY (talk) 05:04, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The new citation you added is a blog article from Medium, which in itself is not high quality enough for a credible source.
 * , ok got it, thank you! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Software_as_a_service&type=revision&diff=1059422141&oldid=1059408103. I hope this one is high quality to support it.--Amber MWY (talk) 10:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Current with Week 7. FULBERT (talk) 07:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Week 8/ Assignment 8/ Cloi929
1.I visited the Intrepid aircraft carrier with my friends on the weekend. I find it very interesting. So I choose Aircraft carrier as my article. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aircraft_carrier&diff=1058849637&oldid=1058849502 2. Second article I choose lululemon. On Black Friday I bought a yoga pants. I think its marketing is very successful. It was the first brand I thought of. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lululemon_Athletica&diff=1058850035&oldid=1057300057 I think I learned a lot when I was looking for information about aircraft carriers. Although the US military has already ranked first in the world in terms of maritime power. But still spending a lot of money to build aircraft carriers. I think the US military has excessive military spending and it is not conducive to world peace. Regarding lululemon, when I checked the information. I found that most of the reviews are negative. But for me as a consumer, it has increased my customer experience, and I think it is very good.Cloi929 (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , The second article is using its own source, which would be considered biased, and did not add anything to the article itself. Can you add a higher level and more objective source for the claim you are making and ping me here when done? FULBERT (talk) 19:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

2. I change lululemon to Quzhou. My roommate is from Quzhou,China. Before I met her, I didn't even know the city. So why not. To get to know this city. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quzhou&diff=1059563756&oldid=1058081554Cloi929 (talk) 05:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , Current with Week 8. FULBERT (talk) 07:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)