User talk:FX2009


 * Hi, what are you looking for help with? --ais523 15:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi I am having trouble viewing my article
Hi,

I am new to submitting an article in Wikipedia. I submitted an article last week, but I do not see the article when I type the title in the search box. The title of my page is FX Solutions. I appreciate any help you can provide. Thank you, FX2009 FX2009 (talk) 15:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * First, are you the same person as User:Fxsol? Even if you aren't, they tried to submit the same article earlier; you might want to read the page there to see what happened.


 * Technically speaking, what you did wrong was to create the article on your user page, rather than as an article. (To create an article, type its name into the search box and click Go, then follow the links from the results page.) However, I'd advise against trying to create that particular article right now, in the form that it's in; it's in the wrong style, and will likely be deleted relatively quickly by new-page-patrolling administrators. (There are a lot of very bad new pages submitted every hour; although your page is better than that, new page patrollers tend to get rather jumpy to delete things (just like vandalfighters get rather jumpy to revert things; there must be some lesson about human nature in here somewhere).) You should definitely read the notability guidelines for companies, Your first article, and Business' FAQ before you try to post the article, and correct it accordingly; it's important to make sure that you obey all the guidelines, so that people don't think of you as a spammer (see How not to be a spammer). In order to correct the immediate problem, make sure enough information's in there that it's obvious that the subject of the article obeys the notability guidelines. --ais523 15:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Er, the article was deleted due to AFD, the deletion discussion is here. // roux   15:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of FX Solutions
A tag has been placed on FX Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Sketchmoose (talk) 22:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, my article was marked for speedy deletion for a second time. Based on the feedback from the deletion log, I went ahead and made some changes before re-posting. I added additional articles and references that speak to FX Solutions verifiability. Can you please tell me how I should proceed? I appreciate any advice. FX2009 (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That G4 was uncalled for, as an article has to go through articles for deletion before criterion G4 applies. If you want, you can draft the article in userspace, maybe User:FX2009/Sandbox or somesuch. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I understand that this article was deleted at an earlier time frame. The original reason for previous deletion was due to a lack of verifiability or sources to the article. To fix the problem, I added several sources to the article which I thought would justify the re-posting. The sources are notable, written by third parties, and from reputable sources such as msnbc and inc.com. I re-posted the article because I fixed the original problem which was lack of sources. Is there something else on this page that I should fix? I appreciate any help and clarification. FX2009 (talk) 16:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See FAQ/Organization and Conflict of interest''.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and forbidden by policies, and also violates our username policy.

However, if you feel that there has been a mistake in your blocking, please appeal this block by adding the text   or email the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Please check that your new username has not already been taken by checking this list.


 * You seem to be officially affiliated with FX Solutions, based on your username. Is this true?  Mango juice talk 21:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Unblock request of FX2009
Hello FX2009. , whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, FX2009 (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I am affiliated with the company. When I looked at the rules and guidelines, it said that it was acceptable to do this.  I have  been forthright in working with wikipedians to correct any issues that may be wrong with the article and have also admitted that I am new to wikipedia.  I changed my username and added sources as previously requested.  Please tell me how I should move forward.  I understand the issues with the username and apologize for the error. Thanks FX2009FX2009 (talk) 14:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you let me know where it said that this was acceptable? Either you misread it or some policy is misstated and needs to be corrected.  Mango juice talk 15:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree not to write about our own companies, under any username. I can't tell from your unblock request; are you planning to avoid writing about your company, and interested in participating at Wikipedia as a personal hobby?  What areas are you interested in editing? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, one more point of clarification: You said in your last request that you have a new username: User:Meg2009, which was indeed created around that time. Is that your account?  Users aren't supposed to have two accounts at the same time.  Mango juice talk 15:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your response. Just so I am clear, does this mean that I can re-post my original article?  Thanks again. FX2009 (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)