User talk:Fabartus/Archive13

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Season boilerplate
Template:Season boilerplate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – sgeureka t•c 09:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Help for template
Hello, I've seen your name on the project template and I permis myself to ask you help: I've just created a new portal Portal:Lyon and I would like to create the templates for the subways, trams, bus. They already exist on the french wikipedia of Lyon metro for example. would you accept to help me ? Thank you Lulu97417 (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:WP:NAMCON
A tag has been placed on Template:WP:NAMCON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. OlEnglish (Talk) 19:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Nevermind, disregard this. I'm just confused as to the purpose of a shortcut in the template namespace but it's not a test edit is it? -- OlEnglish (Talk) 19:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:WP:NAMCON
A tag has been placed on Template:WP:NAMCON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. OlEnglish (Talk) 00:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Baen's Bar
A tag has been placed on Template:Baen's Bar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Your changes to Battles of Saratoga
I've reverted your contributions to Battles of Saratoga. Please be aware that this article is currently a Good Article nominee, and that I am likely to revert or significantly modify contributions that do not meet MOS guidelines. I've outlined some of my issues with your additions on the article's talk page; please continue the discussion there. (I'm not opposed to most of the content being added, but we need to find a better place for it, and write in a more encyclopedic tone.) Thanks.  Magic ♪piano 23:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, but what violation of MOS was significant... an extra section title? Shrug. I undid your lazy edit and interpreted your objection to what you should have done, assuming you respect others time. Should you object to the mention of the bet in the lead, feel free to move it, but I insist there be a clear indication of the strategic effect of the battle mentioned up high—I almost thought I was dealing with some other universe's history, forsooth.


 * Further, if you continue to present text that doesn't acknowledge the ongoing everyday nature of the battle, then you are a fraud as an editor and revising history. It was called THE Battle... because it was ongoing, if not in major actions, but by tension and worries of the day to day commanders on the ground, and the occasional sniping, etc.


 * Lastly, since its FAC/GAC your lucky I wasn't commenting on it... Leaving out the link to France's decision to enter the war in the introduction is really bad. I'll stay clear so long as your summary in the intro is sufficient, w/o getting off point or too long. My breaking it into a new section is a relatively rare event—I normally get comments about adding too much to intro paras! // Fra nkB  23:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I've removed most of your contributions again, with specific edit history comments. The French entry into the war is already in the lead, and in the Aftermath.  Your description of Burgoyne's bet, and Morgan's actions uses colloquial, non-encyclodic language (if I saw that language in an FA candidate, I'd be commenting).  Your mention of Morgan in the image caption is undue; why not identify all of the figures (like the more important figures of Burgoyne and Gates)?


 * Many actions I've read and written about has been followed or preceded by skirmishing; this is not surprising, and doesn't (in my opinion) merit much space. I've left a mention in the lead; a paragraph on the tense nature of the standoff during the Interlude would probably be a good thing.  (I also saw the program you cited.  It's sketchy on a lot of details, and often very poorly characterizes the subleties present in more detailed histories of this and other events.  The todo between Arnold and Gates, which it barely mentioned, is a fine example.)  Magic ♪piano 14:23, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Adirondack Park Preserve
Other than the redirect you created, I got rid of all these mentions. Google Maps may use it, but a) it's not the first mistake they've made and b) they're not the official source for names. New York State, in Environmental Conservation Law section 9-0101(1) makes it very clear that the term is "Adirondack Park" and indeed the agency that regulates land use within the park is the Adirondack Park Agency.

While New York does have a couple of state parks that are officially known as "...State Park Preserve", the Adirondack Park is not one of them (and it's not a state park, either). I have never heard anyone in New York use that term, either. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Who cares what New Yorkers call anything. Some of them like Yakees, and others like Jets, Mets and Giants, forsooth. The name is clearly posted on a widely available map, so aliasing it is a no brainer. So who appointed you God in this? // Fra nkB 03:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Please be civil. And per WP:COMMONNAME, I would note that there's 181,000 Ghits on "Adirondack Park" and only 1,760 on "Adirondack Park Preserve". The former is more than a hundred times more common in addition to being the name used on most printed maps. We can have the redirect, but the term isn't common enough to be used in our articles. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Adirondack Park and Forest Preserve are legal designations created by the State of New York. The term Adirondack Park Preserve appears nowhere in any New York State legal document. Its presence elsewhere would be erroneous. Discussion on this topic appears in citations in Adirondack Mountains and those same citations should probably also appear in Adirondack Park. Adirondacker (talk) 16:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You know, this kind of picayune legalistic juvenile arguments is why I don't bother contributing here much anymore. Too many youngsters relying on authority based on a house of cards vice common sense and getting the job done


 * THERE IS NOTHING in WP:COMMONNAME that implies one cannont put in a variant, for search engines and to match redirects forsooth. That it's been used by one widely available somewhat authoritarian publisher should be a clue as the the right thing to do... guess you need some more years and experience. You two need to edit some European history and geography articles where half a dozen or more valid names are VERY VERY COMMON. 'SCUSE ME FOR TRYING TO CONTRIBUTE... and thanks for adding to the hostile environment. // Fra nkB  16:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Tom Simpson
Template:Tom Simpson has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Jimmy Anderson
Template:Jimmy Anderson has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Grantville Gazette VIII
I have nominated Grantville Gazette VIII, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette VIII. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:20, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nominations
I've nominated the following of your templates for deletion: They've all been substed with the links fixed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Template:Frank Jackson
 * Template:Hans Richter
 * Template:1632-sectstub
 * Template:Fact32
 * Template:CoC

Sorry about all the notices
Fabartus, I'll wait to see if you respond, but it's nothing personal with all the notices. I understand what you were going for (and it actually makes great sense), but it's incredibly difficult for new editors to work on those articles and a number of the links have been changed. I'm making sure to subst and fix all templates before I consider putting them up for deletion. I'm sorry again. I know how it feels to see a lot of hard work deleted and lost forever. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:BilleJ
Template:BilleJ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:HenryM
Template:HenryM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Leslie
Template:Leslie has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Victor
Template:Victor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Darryl Morris
Template:Darryl Morris has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:GramsH
Template:GramsH has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:ChrisH
Template:ChrisH has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:The Seer
Template:The Seer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Bob Cowan
Template:Bob Cowan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:ChristyJ
Template:ChristyJ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Leo Wyatt
Template:Leo Wyatt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:PattyH
Template:PattyH has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cole Turner
Template:Cole Turner has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Elise
Template:Elise has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Dan Gordon
Template:Dan Gordon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 08:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:A01m-gazette1-eMagazine original cover art.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:A01m-gazette1-eMagazine original cover art.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 09:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:A01-Grantville Gazette-I-0743488601.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:A01-Grantville Gazette-I-0743488601.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 09:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Grantville Gazette-IIa-cover-1416520511.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Grantville Gazette-IIa-cover-1416520511.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 09:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Grantville Gazette-V-1011250009.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Grantville Gazette-V-1011250009.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 09:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Grantville Gazette-VI-1011250016.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Grantville Gazette-VI-1011250016.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 09:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Grantvillle Gazette-IV.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Grantvillle Gazette-IV.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 09:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:R from 1632 writer
Template:R from 1632 writer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:R from 1632 M character
Template:R from 1632 M character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Template:Cat 1632 series, Template:John Simpson, Template:Admiral Simpson, and Template:Stearns too. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:N05-1635 The Cannon Law-1416509380.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:N05-1635 The Cannon Law-1416509380.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 10:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:GrantvilleWV-ManningtonMap(lg).gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GrantvilleWV-ManningtonMap(lg).gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 10:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Count Tilly
Template:Count Tilly has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Template:Henri Turenne, Template:APC32, Template:NUS'32, Template:1632 links, and Template:1632 pipetrick conventions too. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Template:Geardown, Template:Charlist, Template:Gazettes, and Template:Siege of Amsterdam too. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:TheBeginning
Template:TheBeginning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Becky Stearns


The article Becky Stearns has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable fictional character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:NUS!32
Template:NUS!32 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:20, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Gustavus
Template:Gustavus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Grantville Gazette Volume 15-GG Cover 15.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Grantville Gazette Volume 15-GG Cover 15.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 03:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632GGbook
Template:1632GGbook has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 03:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:BPsection:About the Gazettes
Template:BPsection:About the Gazettes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 03:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Grantville Gazette II PBcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Grantville Gazette II PBcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 03:57, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 series publications count
Template:1632 series publications count has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:BPsection:The Grantville Gazettes
Template:BPsection:The Grantville Gazettes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Ring of Fire
Template:Ring of Fire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Gazettes order note
Template:Gazettes order note has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Publication order table/TBWCDROM
Template:Publication order table/TBWCDROM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:N06-1634- The Baltic War cover (Src-eflint dot net).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:N06-1634- The Baltic War cover (Src-eflint dot net).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:USE
Template:USE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:CPoE
Template:CPoE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:TAP
Template:TAP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 series categories navigation
Template:1632 series categories navigation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 character guide
Template:1632 character guide has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 institution referenced
Template:1632 institution referenced has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 person referenced
Template:1632 person referenced has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 place referenced
Template:1632 place referenced has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:1632 series redirects needing articles
I have nominated 1632 series redirects needing articles for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:R from 1632 character needs article
Template:R from 1632 character needs article has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:SoTF
Template:SoTF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cite 1632pb
Template:Cite 1632pb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cite 1633
Template:Cite 1633 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 doc page
Template:1632 doc page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cite GG01
Template:Cite GG01 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cite GG02
Template:Cite GG02 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Grantville
Template:Grantville has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Plastikspork (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Your use of 32FC
Hi, I noticed you are using the template 32FC to "comment out" text in some template documentation pages. This template isn't intended to be used this way, so, please, don't do it. If you want to delete somethig, just delete it (it stays in the page's history) or, if you really want to comment it out, use HTML comments. Thanks. Svick (talk) 10:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1632 multiverse


The article 1632 multiverse has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable stub

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jack Merridew 13:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 loose ends
Template:1632 loose ends has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 13:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1632 series battles
I have nominated 1632 series battles, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/1632 series battles. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1632 universe background history
I have nominated 1632 universe background history, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/1632 universe background history&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1632 Editorial Board
I have nominated 1632 Editorial Board, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/1632 Editorial Board. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count gazettes notinprint
Template:1632Count gazettes notinprint has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count total anthologies
Template:1632Count total anthologies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count series total allworks
Template:1632Count series total allworks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count anthologies in print
Template:1632Count anthologies in print has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count total novels
Template:1632Count total novels has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count GGs Current Count
Template:1632Count GGs Current Count has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count epublished only novels
Template:1632Count epublished only novels has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count novels in print
Template:1632Count novels in print has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count series total inprint
Template:1632Count series total inprint has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:59, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632Count GGs Current Count
Template:1632Count GGs Current Count has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Plot thread
Template:Plot thread has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 13:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632width
Template:1632width has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Tt1
Template:Tt1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1632 writers
I have nominated 1632 writers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/1632 writers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:32TOC-beg
Template:32TOC-beg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Template:32TOC-end
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:32s
Template:32s has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:32st
Template:32st has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:32color
Template:32color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:32st/doc
Template:32st/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:1632 writers/references
A tag has been placed on Talk:1632 writers/references requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jack Merridew 07:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:N01-1632 (novel) - cover- 0671578499.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:N01-1632 (novel) - cover- 0671578499.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 12:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1632 institutions
I have nominated 1632 institutions, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/1632 institutions. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 13:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1632 plot threads
I have nominated 1632 plot threads, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/1632 plot threads. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 13:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Cite 34TBC
A tag has been placed on Template:Cite 34TBC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jack Merridew 13:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cite 34TCL
A tag has been placed on Template:Cite 34TCL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Jack Merridew 13:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cite 34TGA
A tag has been placed on Template:Cite 34TGA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Jack Merridew 14:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cite ROF-1pb
A tag has been placed on Template:Cite ROF-1pb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Jack Merridew 14:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Alex Mackay (1632 character)
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 14:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Alex Mackay
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 14:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cite 1632pb
A tag has been placed on Template:Cite 1632pb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Jack Merridew 06:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cite 1633
A tag has been placed on Template:Cite 1633 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Jack Merridew 06:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Cite 1633pb
A tag has been placed on Template:Cite 1633pb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Jack Merridew 06:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:R to 1632 section
Template:R to 1632 section has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:GG01
Template:GG01 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mike Stearns
I have nominated Mike Stearns, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mike Stearns. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:32FC
Template:32FC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:35TEF
Template:35TEF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:ROF-1
Template:ROF-1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 1632 places
I have nominated 1632 places, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/1632 places. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632 place
Template:1632 place has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Publication order table
Template:Publication order table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:16char
Template:16char has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Emergency Committee
Template:Emergency Committee has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:16C
A tag has been placed on Template:16C requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. Jack Merridew 07:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:16E
A tag has been placed on Template:16E requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. Jack Merridew 07:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Grantville Gazette IV
I have nominated Grantville Gazette IV, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Grantville Gazette IV. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cite 1632
Template:Cite 1632 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 10:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cite 34TBW
Template:Cite 34TBW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 10:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cite 34TRR
Template:Cite 34TRR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 10:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Cite GG03
Template:Cite GG03 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 10:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:@1632
Template:@1632 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Ring of Fire II cover (Baen ID 1416573879).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ring of Fire II cover (Baen ID 1416573879).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:2
Template:2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 12:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1
Template:1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 14:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Comoutput
Template:Comoutput has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Comsubtemp
Template:Comsubtemp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Wille Ray Hudson
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Jeff Higgins
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Pete McDougal
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:R from 1632 redirect
Template:R from 1632 redirect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Mary Simpson
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Mary Simpson (1632 character)
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1632
Template:1632 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:1633
Template:1633 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 06:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:35:TEF
Template:35:TEF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:34TGA
Template:34TGA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:34TRR
Template:34TRR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:35TCL
Template:35TCL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:16chrm
Template:16chrm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Baen DOI
Template:Baen DOI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Plastikspork (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:GG08 bookcover.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:GG08 bookcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Badenburg
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 05:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:GG Cover 16.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:GG Cover 16.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:GG14 bookcover.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:GG14 bookcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:GG10 bookcover.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:GG10 bookcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Grantville Gazette-VII.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Grantville Gazette-VII.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Grantville Gazette Volume 15-GG Cover 15.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Grantville Gazette Volume 15-GG Cover 15.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:R from 1632 character
Template:R from 1632 character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Chandler Simpson


The article John Chandler Simpson has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

All below into archive Dec 1st 2009
Please do not use swear words on wikipedia, or harass other users. DrKiernan (talk) 16:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * While Wikipedia isn't censored, do try to be more civil or you'll just end up blocked again. John Reaves 16:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't worry mate, until you lot figure out allowing a revert of a time consuming thoughtful and pertinent edit is far more hostile than a bit of verbal punctuation, I'll continue blocking myself as I've been these last eight months. I do get annoyed when narrow focused editors miss the obvious though. Sometimes I need to scratch the obviousity itch—and I get bit anew by such as he. // Fra nkB 17:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not taking sides. If you have a problem with a user in the future, report it, don't spend your time thinking up snarky comments. John Reaves 17:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Just saw that lovely edit summary. 31 hour block. John Reaves 17:13, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:1632 series books
I have nominated 1632 series books for merging into 1632 series. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium (talk) 01:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:1632 series images pages
I have nominated 1632 series images pages for merging into 1632 series. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium (talk) 01:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

R_to_section template usage and history
Hello Fabartus, what is your understanding of the proper usage of R to section? (I see that you originated it.) I have assumed that it was intended for those redirects that specifically target a section of their target article (and thus have a "#" in the redirect target link). That interpretation seems supported by the redirect's current documentation and it's majority usage (97% meeting this criteria) but it is occasionally being used to tag redirects, such as, where (for various reason) it isn't desirable to specifically target a section, even though the topic of the redirect is a minor part of the target article. I ask because I was seeking a means of identifying those redirects that are sensitive to editors changing section titles in the target article. -- ToET 00:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

David Haydn-Jones listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect David Haydn-Jones. Since you had some involvement with the David Haydn-Jones redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ToET 15:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey again. Just a coincidence here, as I ran into this while fixing redirects pointing to nonextant sections. As noted at the RfD, a redlink is better than a redirect to a dab page with no entry. The info you added to the dab page back in January was reverted two hours later. I certainly wouldn't object to you stubbing out David Haydn-Jones if you wish. -- ToET 15:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Sisterheader
A tag has been placed on Template:Sisterheader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. RL0919 (talk) 12:16, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:R from talkpage
Template:R from talkpage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Cenarium (talk) 23:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)