User talk:Fabiolabaeza465/Twilight (Campbell short story)

If this is your revision of the existing page - - I don't see any major differences. Can you highlight or bold the changes you have made? Also, be sure to cite using the correct wikipedia format etc. ProfHanley (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback 4/12
Green light for peer review! ProfHanley (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review
Lead: the lead is perfect and well detailed, but almost too dense when it should be summarized more. Remove enough so that it encourages a reader to read more if wanted, but still gives enough alone. I would also add a snippet of its reception. In addition I would check the grammar of the original exerpts of the article as well.

Plot: There is an inconsistency in how Kenlin is mentioned. Either address him only as Kenlin or as Ares, to reduce reader confusion. Otherwise, very nice additions.

Reception: The addition is good, but the older other statements need a couple unnecessary punctuation removed.

Overall, your sources, grammar, and writing is excellent, but the rest of the article needs to be tweaked to better fit your polished draft. Chimericmacandcheese (talk) 04:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review
Amazing job! The plot summary looks perfect and the four new sources you've added are good.

1. I would consider moving the underlined section in the intro to a new section called "Setting" or "dystopian themes" or something, because right now it's really crowding up the intro which should be only a short summary of the article. You could also expand on this section a little. 2. The critical reception section is really good. Good sourcing. It could be a little longer if there is more information in your source. 3. Try typing in google scholar "twilight campbell literary devices" and see what comes up. If analysis of the literature exists, it would be really good to include that in the article. 4. The sources you have are good. A couple more couldn't hurt. 5. If there are criticisms of Campbell's story, include them. Again, google scholar is a good tool. The sources you already found have additional info / analysis you can include. If these sources include additional descriptions of character you can include that too. 6. The information you added in the plot summary made it significantly clearer what the story is about. 7. Good unbiased tone.

Overall, what you have is really good. Finding one of two more sources and adding a additional section about setting, themes, or criticisms is my suggestion for improving it further. LofgrenSFSUenglish465 (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)