User talk:Fabolou$

Welcome
Thank you for experimenting with the page Rocky Mountain High School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 01:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you wish to contest the speedy deletion, add the hangon template to the articles. -- DiegoTehMexican 01:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Rocky Mountain High School
Your recent edit to Rocky Mountain High School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

im not vandalizing
u guys just keep erasing my stuff. its not vandalism. Fabolou$ 01:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Your problem was this edit: . If you make the page good, and don't try to add any more shananigans, then you won't be reverted, and the bot won't revert you either. The last time, the bot reverted you because you put extra junk in the article again . So keep it clean, and nothing will happen. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 01:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Rocky Mountain High School

 * Okay, you've worked on this article, and now a whole lot of people want to delete it. Doesn't really seem fair, does it.  What I suggest you do is make the article here User:Fabolou$/Rocky Mountain High School and when it's ready for the main space, leave me a message and I'll move it in for you.  Does that sound fair?
 * Also, one more thing is that we have a rule called the Three-revert rule which says that you can't revert an article more than 3 times in a 24 hour period. If you revert once more, you'll have broken it. -- Samir धर्म  05:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Frontrmhs.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Frontrmhs.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I've put your page back
It seemed like a legit page to me, so I put it back, so you wouldn't be in violation of the 3RR. If the admin thinks there's problem with that, they he/she can contact me with legit concerns. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 14:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC) WP:TROLL. - it's basically make bad additions, or you're just trying to be a pain in the butt, but you're sneaky about doing it. A troll will do something like add misinformation, then try very hard to defend it. It appears that the admin was a bit quick to block your account, but that's the problem with adding swear words to an article, no matter the reason. People will not necessariy look on the long history, only your addition. So if the admin unblocks you, you will be good, but just know that you will probably be blocked much quicker from here on for any violation. Good luck. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 16:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * OK thanks for doing that, but why am I blocked for "trolling" what is trolling? Fabolou$ 16:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

<<unblock|i wasn't trolling, people erased my page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabolou$ (talk • contribs) NOTE TO UNBLOCKING ADMIN: this user was probably not making changes in bad faith, but it appears that there was a misunderstanding in deleting his page, which he didn't handle very well. See my comments at the end of the page. He's been warned not to try it again or be done for good, but the block, if I have the right to say so, was probably premature. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 16:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)>>


 * I've assumed good faith and given you a second chance. Please take some time to read some of the links in the welcome message above. A collection of random trivia thrown together does not make a good article. --  Netsnipe  ►  16:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Autoblocked
<>

Please try again. Those are placeholder values. Are you sure you're still blocked at this time? --  Netsnipe  ►  07:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)