User talk:Fabregas 2001

Welcome!

Hello, Fabregas 2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! CHECK THIS OUT FOR TIPS, I'M NOT SO OLD IN WIKI SO I HOPE TO SHARE WITH YOU WHAT I HAVE GOT SO FAR. Crosstemplejay 18:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC) crosstemplejay
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of John Flanagan(footballer born in 1993)


The article John Flanagan(footballer born in 1993) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTCRYSTAL and non referenced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. User:ConconJondor talk contribs 18:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

John Flanagan
You created an article, John Flanagan(footballer born in 1993), which Wikipedia welcomes, however we would prefer it if you could wait until there are verifiable sources (WP:V and WP:SOURCES) that tell people how he is notable (WP:NOTABILITY), rather than because it was mentioned on sky sports that he would play in the future (WP:FUTURE). Thanks, and I hope you stay with Wikipedia and enjoy being a Wikipedian, User:ConconJondor talk contribs 18:31, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kenny Sheils


The article Kenny Sheils has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. France3470 (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wayne Rooney's Street Striker with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Monty 845  18:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ilogan 55-0 Madron for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ilogan 55-0 Madron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ilogan 55-0 Madron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 19:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study
Welcome to Wikipedia. I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 21:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Adding information to biographies of living persons
Hello. Please have a look at the policy WP:Biographies of living persons. We mustn't add controversial info to articles about real live people without at the same time adding a reference to a reliable published source that specifically verifies the info added. A bare link to the front page of a tabloid newspaper website, as you added with this edit to Frank McLintock, isn't ever good enough to be a reference for controversial information. If you can't find reliable verification for a piece of information, please don't add it. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 08:47, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ore Aduba


The article Ore Aduba has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Cesc Fabregas


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pichpich (talk) 17:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Li Weifeng, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 17:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Wilshere with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sea photo Talk 17:08, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Fabregas 2001
Hi. I know you think it's funny to have a bogus sockpuppet tag on your user page but it's ultimately misleading. Please do not reinsert it. Pichpich (talk) 22:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Atlantic League (football), you may be blocked from editing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please stop making silly disruptive edits like this and this. Struway2 (talk) 13:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Lfcforever1982, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unbelievable, Jeff!


The article Unbelievable, Jeff! has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I suppose this doesn't quite fit any speedy deletion criterion but I don't think anyone will dispute that this has no business being an article or even a redirect.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 21:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keiran Bowell


The article Keiran Bowell has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. – Dream out loud (talk) 19:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Comment Removed


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ben Ben (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Hi Fabregas. You seem to be mostly making constructive edits. But if you can't make 5 constructive edits in a row without including something like this or like that then it would be best to not contribute at all. You have been warned multiple times already and it's somewhat miraculous that you haven't been blocked. That miracle won't last if you don't change. Pichpich (talk) 21:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I (and others) have reverted some of your recent edits. There are two types of issues. The first is that you keep inserting anecdotal content or details about whatever happened in yesterday's game: these things are not important when writing encyclopedia articles which try to maintain a broader perspective not distorted by recentism. The other issue is with edits that insert clearly non-encyclopedic content such as your recent "girls love player X" edits. I'm not sure what your intention was but this is likely to be perceived as fairly annoying joke edits. Pichpich (talk) 03:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Football League Championship controversy 25 April 2011


A tag has been placed on Football League Championship controversy 25 April 2011, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MattParker 119 (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Ben Amoo


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Ben Amoo. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - David Amoo. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at David Amoo - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Struway2 (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Sandbox
hello, this is my sandbox! Simeon Jackson is such a pest ! 90+5 minutes! torres SCORES! i am so fantastically happy for the poor guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * Hi, Fabregas 2001. The reason you are still able to edit your talk page is so that the option of filing an unblock request will be available to you, not so that you can start a blog. Please do not post random remarks here that are not related to building an encyclopedia. Thanks.-- Diannaa (Talk) 20:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)