User talk:Fabulance

Fabulance
A tag has been placed on Fabulance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. BencherliteTalk 03:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I am building the page right now and am unfamiliar with the coding. Please be patient as I make this page. Thank you.


 * A superhero called Fabulance, with zero Google hits? Hmmm.  BencherliteTalk 03:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I am writing the page now.

Zero google hits does not mean anything. this is part of the process for the creation of the character history so that the literary agent can shop it to syndicates. It is an underground character with a local following... and IN FACT, the very first hit on Google is to the person that this character is based on :  Lance Gorton, who is the co-creator (as shown on the page). May I continue?
 * Wikipedia is not a place to promote anything, nor to write original content. By policy, it's only for writing that can be cited from other reliable osurces. DMacks (talk) 04:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

It is not violating any copyright and it is not encyclopedic. This page is not being used for promotin, but rather as validation of the character. Out Magazine will be a source of citation, but it has not been published there, yet, although it is slated to be. As I said, this character has a local fan base, has strips written and published locally and is going national with the publication in Out Magazine. Additionally, if it gains nationwide popularity, as it has locally, then the Here Network has expressed interest in developing it as a cable animated series. This is why we are making a Wikipedia page about the character and strip.


 * That's a lot of speculation and future-event-dependency there! If and when this thing is actually notable, we'd love to have a page about it. If it's only potentially or soon to be notable, or there are not yet reliable sources you can cite to document that notability, the page won't be viable yet. Might save you some aggravation to hold off writing the page until there is something viable (in the Wikipedia sense) to say. DMacks (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

NEW - Well as luck would have it, my laptop crashed before I saved anything. So all of the text I had written has been los. So I will re-make this page again soon.

Image permission problem with Image:'Blue Balls'.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:'Blue Balls'.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geoff Plourde (talk) 05:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:'Blue Balls'.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:'Blue Balls'.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Fabulance
A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Fabulance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for businesses.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page in question and leave a note on this page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 03:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

This account, , has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.


 * This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it&mdash;see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or related to a 'real-world' group or organization. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:
 * Add on your user talk page. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can usually still edit your own talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far more easily allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Changing username.
 * Alternatively, you can "abandon" the contributions under this username and create a new account, which is much faster and easier, especially if you have few or no edits.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text on your user talk page or emailing the administrator who blocked you. - Dank (push to talk) 03:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Fabulance Splash.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fabulance Splash.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Fabulance Introduction.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fabulance Introduction.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Fabulance BlueBalls.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fabulance BlueBalls.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 10:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)