User talk:FactCheckSV

May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pupusa, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pupusa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 16:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rsk6400. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. ''I'm referring to your edit summary "Atempt to stop the trolling that has been recently started from some hondurans". Everybody is welcome to constructively edit here regardless of nationality.'' Rsk6400 (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Rsk6400 (talk) 16:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Origins
There is an entire section in the article discussing how the origins of Pupusa is disputed. With cites. Simply adding your own claim about what is "widely recognized" (See "weasel words" on this) does not settle the matter. Please do not edit war on this and, if you think you have a cite that settles the matter, please discuss on the talk page. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)