User talk:Fact Checker 777

Welcome!
Hello, Fact Checker 777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Nibiru cataclysm has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. —Laoris (talk) 16:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
I noticed your additions to Nibiru cataclysm have been reverted three or four times just in the last few days. Please be aware that the expected next step is not to insert the same text again. Instead you should start a discussion on the talk page for that article. (Just follow that link and click the button that says "new section" at the top of the page). There you can discuss what you think needs to be added, and other editors can give you advice on how to add it in a way that conforms to Wikipedia rules on sourcing and so on. Please be aware there are rules regarding what we call edit warring and if you run afoul of them you might lose your editing privileges temporarily. Good luck, and welcome to Wikipedia. --Krelnik (talk) 17:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.