User talk:FactoidFinder

Jane Skinner
Additionally, your biographical information is inaccurate. She resides in Westchester, New York (not Connecticut) and is not separated from her husband. The suggestions about the program being cancelled due to low ratings is not attributed. Neither is the reason for being taken off the John Gibson program. The Inside Cable blog suggests both of those statements are incorrect.

While I have no problem with many of your edits, there are two which must be addressed. First, you remove "political" from her job at KBJR, when it is clearly stated on her FOX Bio as being such (it also states that, by their definition at least, she is a news anchor, but that issue can be dropped). Also, you change the "Fox News Channel personalities" to "Fox News Channel correspondent", which not only should be plural, but does not exist as a category. Please, do *not* revert these two items again without a decent explanation as to why (either here or on the article's talk page). As this point, I am reverting these two items only (plus linking the "news presenter" phrase). If there's a problem, discuss it, but no need to create a revert war over such a minor issue. Lets get the article firmed down. --  Huntster (Talk • Contribs • Email) 01:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Shep Smith
Why lable the report as false? That violates NPOV unless you have actual evidence the report was falsified. Both side of the issue are represented in the section. Ace-o-aces 15:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

You are reporting as fact something you remember hearing. What is needed is a concrete reference like an article, video, announcement. You must provide a way for people to check what you assert. If you don't, other readers have the right to challenge you and remove your edits. Do not add the statement back without proof. At some point, when there is independent information about a significant other, you can add to the article. You might consider reviewing Wikipeidia guidelines on Verifiability, Reliable Source, Burden of Proof, Neutral Point of View. You can find these by searching WP:V. Misstory 13:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Provide a link to the video you are claiming. Otherwise, leave the article alone until you can provide a link to the video or an article. Also, please read about Wikipedia Verifiability. I am going to assume for now that it is you don't understand that you have to provide references for what you put in an article. Please do not change the article again until you have a link or article we can all look at. Misstory 11:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)