User talk:Factorylad

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 14:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

tipton three merge?
May I ask you to take a look at Talk:Tipton Three?

Some people think a merge is a good idea. But more people thought it was a mistake.

I continue to think it is a mistake. Did you have new reasons to add to the discussion?

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 23:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Factory records.jpg
Hello, Factorylad. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Factory records.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Factorylad. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Rafis Revenge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rafis Revenge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rafis Revenge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rafis Revenge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Rationale for album covers
Noticed that you'd removed the disputed tag from the Rafi's Revenge page before because you thought it was a mistake. It seems a bit odd to me but apparently album covers, single covers etc have to have a 'Fair use rationale' for each use in addition to the 'boiler plate' added when uploading. You can see an example on one of the covers I uploaded here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Feist-monarch.jpg

Once you've added the rationale you can get rid of the dispute tag. Just thought I'd help you out 'cos I didn't understand the bot message for ages after a load of my album covers got tagged! Cavie78 11:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Target Earth DVD Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Target Earth DVD Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedcabling
You beat me to it! :P I had my article ready and was ready to press the Save button, but was just three minutes later than you. I refactored it a bit - I didn't think the separate "Winners" section was necessary for such a short article, and reworded a couple of minor points that did not seem notable. But anyway, well done for being first. :) • Anakin  (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Welcome 

Thank you for joining the Law Enforcement Wikiproject on the English Wikipedia! As you would have guessed we are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to law enforcement

Since you now are a member you get to have our userbox or banner on your userpage! To add these use:
 * 1)  -- our userbox, or
 * 2)  -- our member banner.

Here are some more tips to get you started:
 * Creating articles: See here for articles you can create, but don't forget to add   to the base of the article and our project banner to the talk page of the article using   
 * Participate on our talk page: It is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it]. There are also a number of small projects on the talk page as well that may be of interest to you!
 * Check the bulletin board: For news and information, please read the bulletin board regularly or add it to you user-page using: 
 * Improve an article: Click here to find all the really short articles, pick one from that list and improve it. When you are done go to the talk page of that article and removed the bit in bold and another editor will be along to see how well you have done and reassess the article to a much higher class.

All members are reminded:
 * That this project aims for: No vandalism, no conflict and if particular articles in this project are suffering from vandalism, edit wars or talk-page abuse, please add it to the Article Watch List

In a nutshell:
 * Join, Create & Assess
 * Members in trouble can go to:


 * 1) SGGH speak! (Project Coordinator)
 * 2) Dep. Garcia ( Talk   + |  Help Desk  |  Complaints  )  (Assistant Coordinator)
 * 3) Or any project coordinator listed on the main project page or members page.

Again, Thank you and Welcome

Any more questions please do not hesitate to contact me! thanks, again welcome! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 08:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Hello Factorylad

How are you finding Wikipedia so far? Are you enjoying editing Law Enforcement related articles? now your a fully fledged member, I was looking at your created pages and I must make you aware that I think they are very good. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 15:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

That was something I found too when I joined only a little while ago that most articles you know about are already created, but then again there is no mad race or rush to make them, < althought you can find the list of outstanding articles in the link for the project, so your a police officer? in England right? Happy Editing! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 15:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes of course, I dont blame you. If anythings dangerous the Internet has to be in the top 10, lol most of the users like to display Userboxes me included. Thanks for the info :) Again happy editing! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 15:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Law Enforcement Barnstar Proposal Poll
 Hello there ,

We here at Wikiproject Law Enforcement are currently in the process of deciding wither or not to make this WikiProject Law Enforcement's official Barnstar award. Being that you are a member of Wikiproject Law Enforcement, we are humbly asking you to voice your opinion here about our new Barnstar.

Thank You and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 21:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

--Mifter (talk) 21:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jenny Randles
I have nominated Jenny Randles, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jenny Randles. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 18:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations on Jenny Randles not being deleted, personally, I fail to see why it was put up in the first place. Regards, Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 16:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!
Have a good one! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 11:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of SPEAR System
I have nominated SPEAR System, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/SPEAR System. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nate1481 14:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:316534493 l.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:316534493 l.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Covert policing in the United Kingdom
Hello Factorylad, thanks for your polite message. The reference did say that most forces did not have a dedicated surveillance team, but then again the book was not as recent as others. If you think what you brought up needs to be changed, by all means please feel free to do so :). Regards, Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 15:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Apart from that, do you think the article is OK? Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 15:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:316534493 l.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:316534493 l.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:316534493 l.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:316534493 l.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:SpiesLiesWhistleblowers.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SpiesLiesWhistleblowers.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thirdship (talk) 07:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Reflist/Robert Taylor incident


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 01:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Target Earth DVD Cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Target Earth DVD Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Derrick Capper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UK miners' strike. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Norwell Roberts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CID. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of John Kent (Police Officer)
Hello! Your submission of John Kent (Police Officer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:45, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for John Kent (police officer)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord Philip Knights (Police Officer).png
 Thanks for uploading File:Lord Philip Knights (Police Officer).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lord Philip Knights (Police Officer).png


A tag has been placed on File:Lord Philip Knights (Police Officer).png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Derrick Capper (Police Officer).png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Derrick Capper (Police Officer).png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Derrick Capper (Police Officer).png
Thanks for uploading File:Derrick Capper (Police Officer).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aerial Phenomena Enquiry Network


The article Aerial Phenomena Enquiry Network has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "As mentioned in the article itself this organization is likely a hoax, and there is no independent evidence to the contrary; there are no inline citations to reliable sources, no such sources seem to exist on-line, and the article content is, at best, entirely original research; even if it is not a hoax, there is no evidence this organization or its alleged activities are in any way notable. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 16:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 17:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Aerial Phenomena Enquiry Network for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aerial Phenomena Enquiry Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aerial Phenomena Enquiry Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 09:50, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)