User talk:Facts707/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Moj ska  15:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your opinion on NPOV Sarah Palin?
Please post at talk. LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 03:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

SP massive deletions...
Please see Talk:SP regarding the major change you just made. If you sincerely hope to build consensus for that, I suggest you revert what you've done and bring the issue to talk with compelling reasons on behalf. If, instead, you're just doing it to cause a stir, well... Fcreid (talk) 11:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * "as per talk"....what talk. I don't remember any talk/decision. Please revert.--Buster7 (talk) 12:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Facts, I have not decided if I support your unilateral, major edit to the campaign section. As Fcreid pointed out above, you should have discussed this on talk prior to the edit as there has been many editors involved over a period of time. Per    WP:SS, a summary of the deleted/moved material is required and discussion is needed to achieve consensus. IP75 (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Subaru G4e electric concept car (rear).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Subaru G4e electric concept car (rear).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Electric Car prototypes
Hi there,

Seems relevant to have that section. Can you just clear up a couple of points for me:
 * On the todo list there is a thing about prototypes. I think that the todo is rather redundant cos was done before a major reformat which probably renamed sections etc. But if you could take a quick look and e.g. mark as done or superseded that would be great.
 * Why do you put CURRENTDATE and CURRENTTIME templates? Surely it would be better simply to use the actual date you wrote it? Perhaps you meant to subst: ? Otherwise they will change each time it is regurgitated, won't they?

Best wishes SimonTrew (talk) 14:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Subaru G4e electric concept car (rear).jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Subaru G4e electric concept car (rear).jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Stifle (talk) 10:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of End-diastolic dimension
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MS  (Talk | Contributions)  19:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of End-systolic dimension
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MS  (Talk | Contributions)  19:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at End-diastolic dimension
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * Place  on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * Make your case on the article's .

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:08, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. This is encyclopedia not comedy book Typ932 T&middot;C 13:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Found on road dead


The article Found on road dead has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Acroterion  (talk)  13:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Distillers in Canada
A tag has been placed on Distillers in Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:26, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Distillers in Canada
I have nominated Distillers in Canada, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Distillers in Canada. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Found on Road Dead and Government Motors
Those nicknames are NPOV and not notable. I already explained why I deleted the section at Talk:Ford Motor Company Please don't try to use Wikipedia to push a political viewpoint or just to prove a point.--A Second Man in Motion (talk) 08:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Found on road dead
I have tagged the redirect for deletion by an admin, per WP:Attack page. It does not seem to serve any legitimate purpose. We don't have a redirect to every random titbit in an article. Hans Adler 10:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but no
Respectfully disagree. What you wrote was as follows:

''Woodlands Family Theme Park Devon is an all-weather amusement park in Devon, United Kingdom.

''

This isn't an article but rather a declarative sentence. Anyone researching the subject knows what it is already; this needs a lot more content. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Look, I have no idea what someone's intentions are when something like that is created. If I hadn't deleted it, another admin would likely have done so. I've seen little stubs like that linger for months on end after their creation. I'm happy that you recreated the article with a bit more content; no further objection from me. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of End-diastolic dimension
I have nominated End-diastolic dimension, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/End-diastolic dimension. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 12:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Had almost forgotten about this article. Thank you for pointing it out. I have moved this to be a new section of Ventricle (heart) along with redirects. Also added a ref for its definition. Diastole could have a ref to the new location if desired. Also did "end-systolic dimension" in the same manner. Facts707 (talk) 08:17, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kim Campbell bw.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kim Campbell bw.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kim Campbell bw.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kim Campbell bw.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 03:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Canada
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  GraYoshi2x► talk 22:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Please explain what you object to at Canada. Here are the changes I made (I also corrected a small grammar error and added a link to "Elections in Canada" in the "see also" of the Government section):

>>>

, and over 80% of the Canadian population lives within 150 km of it. As a northern country, most of Canada is noted for cold winters, although summers can be quite warm and oranges and grapes are grown in some areas. It is also very urban, with over 80% of the population living in an urban or suburban area. Canada is known for its diverse natural beauty, wildlife, abundant natural resources, and its people's commitment to fairness and equality for all.

<<<

The two 80% figures are referenced later in the article under the section Canada. I supposed I could have moved the reference up further, but that is not strictly required under WP. Are you questioning the "cold winters", "summers can be quite warm", or "oranges and grapes are grown"? I can certainly add refs for those if necessary (they are very common knowledge). Are you questioning "diverse natural beauty, wildlife, abundant resources, etc."? I can supply refs for those, but they are very common knowledge.

Also, in Wikipedia we generally don't just remove information because it doesn't have a reference. We use which looks like, and then if felt necessary post something to the contributor's page.

Anyway, what I was trying to do here was give some actual description of Canada and what it is known for, besides its long border with the United States. Facts707 (talk) 22:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC) (also posted to User:GraYoshi2x talk page)

Victoria re "minor" edits
Your edits to the Victoria article have been helpful, but please do not mark changes in text/content as "minor" edits. Minor edits are meant to be punctuation, spelling, minor formatting fixes, maybe corrections of prepositions, missing definite articles etc.Skookum1 (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Robert Stanfield opposition leader of Canada.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Robert Stanfield opposition leader of Canada.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Your changes to the Gender article
Hello, Facts707. I reverted your changes to the Gender article. The reasons why are stated there. I would be more than willing to work out the design of the lead and other parts of the article with you. Flyer22 (talk) 19:24, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * As I stated on the talk page, "Good recent changes, Facts707. But shouldn't we keep something about grammatical gender in the lead, since we have an Etymology and usage section and it approaches grammatical gender there, or should we just remove that section?"


 * Also, I ask that you talk on the talk page more. In addition to editing, Wikipedia is all about discussion and compromises. It makes it easier to work with others here, such as with achieving WP:Consensus. Flyer22 (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Just letting you know that I replied on my talk page. Since you started the new discussion there, I'll most likely reply there regarding this discussion. Flyer22 (talk) 19:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arizona boycott
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 19:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Arizona boycott
I have nominated Arizona boycott, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Arizona boycott. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 19:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Spill, baby, spill listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spill, baby, spill. Since you had some involvement with the Spill, baby, spill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Don Cuan (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Lake Crescent Edits
I found your edits of the [Lake Crescent] article. As a whole they seemed well thought out. However, in the future, please be mindful to use the "Show Preview" button. I realize you spent a lot of time (presumably researching) editing that page. However you probably could have managed to cut it down to 4 or 5 edits in stead of the 26 edits you made by previewing first. Thanks Shporang (talk) 04:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Article size
I started a discussion ARTICLE SIZE and it got one supportive response. Theres too much clutter on the talk page as well.--Metallurgist (talk) 22:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Also I have been using the WC2006 as comparison and it lacks a disciplanry record on the main page.--Metallurgist (talk) 22:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I agree that the article was getting too long. I like how the excessive details on suspensions are no longer shown. However, I do miss the information on active suspensions (players suspended for an upcoming game in the tournament itself). I'll discuss more on the World Cup talk page. Facts707 (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

English language varieties
"Italy are the defending champions" is correct as the 2010 FIFA World Cup page is not written in US English. If a page is not particular to one variety of English the current variety should be retained. See WP:ENGVAR Thanks Bevo74 (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Your change looks good to me. Might be tempting fate to say it is for the England team Bevo74 (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

There is no reason to change to British English on 2010 FIFA World Cup. The policy on Wikipedia is to leave international differences in the state it was after the article is past the stub stage unless there is a compelling national reason to change it. Since the subject is neither English nor American, it appears that it should stay. Please discuss on the article's talk page. The article itself is starting to load too slowly due to the multitude of edits so I would appreciate not entering an nationally-based edit war over this. For the record, I am Canadian and have never heard hosts used in this way. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I've changed it to the English language variety neutral "host team South Africa" as per WP:COMMONALITY. Personally I don't care too much, but other editors are more fussy about this. The problem here was that I combined three facts into one sentence for clarity and brevity, but one of the statements was in American English while the other two were in British English, thus I changed the American English "host" to BE "hosts" for consistency. Anyway, my latest edit should keep both Brits and Americans happy. Facts707 (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * BTW, the speed of displaying a Wikipedia article in a browser is not related to the number of edits it has had. It is primarily due to the overall number of requests on the WP servers, and to a much lesser extent how long the article is and how much processing the WP servers have to do to display the article (e.g. pictures, tables, etc.) Facts707 (talk) 16:45, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I disagree. The number of edits is a factor. The render time is a completely different issue. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Net sport


The article Net sport has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Complete neologism. No-one refers to these sports or the collective as "net sports". Zero relevant Google hits back this up. Contrast with ball game which is an actual in-use term to describe a class of games.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zunaid 11:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Article updated with three citations from durably archived reliable sources. Next time a simple message here would suffice without putting excessive denials and criticism in the article itself.Facts707 (talk) 20:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Dundas Island (British Columbia) change in error
I don't know which guidelines you're invoking, perhaps the US or UK ones; they are not global standards, each country has its own disambiguation guidelines. For Canada, geographic objects such as islands, mountains, lakes etc use parentheses for disambiguation; comma-province is ONLY used for settlements; there is some crossover when an island is also a (major) settlement, but these are very rarely disambiguated (e.g. Saltspring Island, Galiano Island, Texada Island - though each of those also has distinct settlements within/upon it), and in cases where there are, for example, a lake and a town of the same name, separate articles are written with each having its own disambiguation. Hard to think of an island one, though I do know that Gambier Island exists as an island article, but there also is/was a postal locale on that (large) island called Gambier Island, British Columbia, among other places also on that island. Please do not make any similar changes to CAnadian articles, as you obviously didn't know about these guidelines and assumed Canada was bound by some other country's....if you're an admin, please change it back; if you're not an admin, then find one to do it; you can start at WP:CANTALK which is frequented by Canadian admins....Skookum1 (talk) 07:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I used the revert log to change it back. Also the Nunavut one.Skookum1 (talk) 07:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * My mistake, I thought that particular naming convention applied to islands as well, but you are right it only applies to communities. Sorry, Facts707 (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

wowowhut?
you have the oddest collection of new pages created. ViniTheHat (talk) 05:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks! (I think). I usually create new pages only when I go looking for something that I want more info on and can't find it. I don't focus on a particular subject. Cheers, Facts707 (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Creating disambiguation pages
Hello Facts707, I noticed you made one or two disambig pages for species epithets, including "Eucosmia". It seems that when these pages come to people's attention, they usually do get deleted, on the basis that they are partial title matches. Here is a couple of comments from an AfD discussion about "tristis" which was first a disambig page and then an attempt at an article: ..................

............
 * Delete. We had several of these at AfD a few years ago (Articles for deletion/Canus, Articles for deletion/Miserabilis, Articles for deletion/Vulgaris), where the consensus was for deletion. My rationale remains the same as that expressed in my !vote and later comment at Articles for deletion/Miserabilis. Deor (talk) 15:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete A specific epithet like this an adjective and is an intrinsic part of a name; it is not comparable with the a name like Robert. The epithet "tristis" is nonsensical to use by itself to refer to a species; it is like referring to New York City as just "New" or Long Island as just "Long". This "article" is still essentially an expanded disambiguation page and "tristis" (or any of the other specific epithets that keep cropping up as new disambig pages) are definitely partial title matches, which is the first thing mentioned in the list of "What not to include" in the Wikipedia Disambiguation guidelines, see WP:DABNOT. I have been unable to find any print sources where the specific epithet "tritis" is used by itself. As an article this would be like a list of towns that have the word "South" as part of their name. It is unencyclopedic. I agree strongly with User: Deor and the examples of previous AfDs he gives are extremely relevant here.Invertzoo (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 13:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * What does the word mean? Hi - I'd be happy to be rid of Eucosmia if it is of no use. My only interest in it is its similar spelling to Eucosma, Euosmia, etc.  I tried to find a definition for eucosmia but it is not in Wiktionary or any other online dictionaries or other etymology resources as far as I can tell. Is it a Latin or Greek word? The only reference I could find was that it means "decorum" from Pythagoras of Samos (ca. 570–496 B.C.) . But I'm no expert on molluscs or Latin words, so its your call! (I'll post this on Invertzoo's talk page too). Thanks, Facts707 (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I am answering here because if the disambig page is deleted, then the talk page will be also. I don't really know the ancient Greek language, but I believe "eu" means good and "kosmos" means universe. Scientific names (no matter what their source language) must be put together as if they were Latin words, so maybe this is a Latinized version of "good universe"? Just a guess. Invertzoo (talk) 20:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Good point - I'll leave the discussion here. Also that sounds like a pretty good guess on the meaning of "eucosmia". "Eukosmia" turns up a few more hits, eg: "LIFE AND PRINCIPLES The feeling of ease is by far the most general trait of mind in a democratic society. Though we call it a feeling, it is in fact a parapsychological factor ; something which exists in the pattern of life, and yet can never be entirely translated into terms of individual consciousness. In a democracy, the pattern of life itself has the character of naturalness, of something which only the Greek term Eukosmia can translate; it radiates the elements of the conviction — perhaps never fully articulated at a conscious level — that the problems of life can be solved within the normal exercise of the mind." and also: "His duty was to accompany the boy to school each day and to see that he got there safely; to carry the boy's books and his lyre; to watch his conduct in school; to see to his conduct in the street; to train the boy in morals, in manners and in deportment. He must see that the boy walked modestly with downcast head in the streets; he must see that he gave place to older people and was becomingly silent in their presence; he must teach him to be well-mannered at the table and to wear his clothes with grace. He had to teach him all the Greek meant by eukosmia, good manners, good deportment, pleasantness of life." ... which doesn't really help us here, but maybe I can define the word in Greek Wiktionary some time.


 * So, it looks like delete the disambig page is what we should do here? If so that's fine with me. Facts707 (talk) 21:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Kim Campbell official portrait.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kim Campbell official portrait.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fixing 'Sequoia sempervirens'. It was actually a manual conversion i.e. a silly human error. Thanks for sorting it before I got to it! Lightmouse (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Monkeytail
Do you have a reference for this addition? If not, please self-revert. Thanks Pass a Method   talk  19:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I added a ref. The reason I added it is because Monkey tail redirects to At sign. Facts707 (talk) 00:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthritis Society


A tag has been placed on Arthritis Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Inks.LWC (talk) 03:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Copyright and other things
Please note that you cannot just copy and paste text (or images) from other places. Please see WP:COPYVIO. Even if you wrote the text at the original site, it can't be used here unless licensed under the Creative Commons thing that COPYVIO will tell you about. If you are not the copyright holder, you have to get well away from their wording when using the information. In addition to this, please see WP:CORP and WP:RS. RS is reliable independent sources. Peridon (talk) 10:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Please restore the article on the Arthritis Society. I had worded the first sentence appropriately and the second sentence was merely a descriptive line from the Society itself about the Society and its many branches. I'd be happy to reword the second line as necessary.  I mentioned in the talk page that there was "more to come soon". The Arthritis Society is one of the world's major health organizations and has contributed a large amount of research to the study of arthritis. Facts707 (talk) 10:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)