User talk:FactsFirst

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Feel free to discuss changes to the article on its discussion page. bobanny 05:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. . You also might want to check out WP:3RR policy on repeatedly making the same edit to an article, which could lead to a block of your user account. Again, feel free to discuss the issue at Talk:Kevin Potvin. bobanny 08:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I read the Globe and Mail article, thanks. I suggest you take a look at WP:NPOV, WP:NOT, WP:BLP, WP:OR, and maybe also encyclopedia to see what the difference between a newspaper editorial and an encyclopedia article is. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ). That will add your user name and date/time stamp. thanks. bobanny 08:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ··coe l acan 03:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You do not need to make your case to me; I am not an arbiter of content. You may wish to copy and paste the comment you left on my talk page to the article's talk page instead, Talk:Kevin Potvin, where those who edit the article will read it. My talk page is not part of the dispute resolution process. ··coe l acan 02:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)