User talk:Facts C0h3r3nc3

Welcome!
Hello, Facts C0h3r3nc3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Paleo Neonate  – 09:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ark Encounter, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Paleo Neonate  – 09:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I unfortunately had to revert your second edit to Ark Encounter. Please note that "pro-evolution critics" is simply mainstream science and presenting it as opinion rather than in Wikipedia's voice may introduce WP:FALSEBALANCE.  WP:YESPOV also states: .  I also suggest reading the following: Talk:Evolution/FAQ, scientific method, scientific theory, evolution as fact and theory, evidence of common descent.  Thanks, — Paleo  Neonate  – 12:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll let another editor review your latest change. : I thought that I made it clear above that this is not the point of view of particular critics, but the scientific consensus.  I really recommend reading those above links.  It is not a question of WP:IDONTLIKEIT but a question of representing facts as facts.  WP:NEUTRAL on Wikipedia does not mean that we must attempt to balance the article in favor of everyone or every point of view.  The encyclopedia does have a bias for reality and mainstream science, by policy.  See also WP:PSCI.  Thanks, — Paleo  Neonate  – 02:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 07:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)