User talk:Factsfromchina

November 2013
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kenneth Huang, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. buffbills7701 00:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kenneth Huang with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 06:27, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

May 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kenneth Huang ‎. Sjö (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kenneth Huang. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Abecedare (talk) 17:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

I have blocked you for a relatively short time in the hope that after the block expires you will take any reasoable concerns you have with the Kenneth Huang article to the article talk page or the appropriate noticeboard. Continuing to remove content without any explanation or discussion, as you have done for years, is likely to see you blocked from editing wikipedia permanently. Abecedare (talk) 17:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Sjö (talk) 12:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Factsfromchina, it appears that you used IP to make the disputed edits to the Kenneth Huang article while your account was blocked. If you repeat such socking or resume your disruption once your block ends, you will be blocked from editing wikipedia. Abecedare (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long-term disruptive editing and slow edit-warring at Kenneth Huang‎ (while also apparently using IP sock accounts) with no attempt to discuss the issues, despite numerous warnings and invitations. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Abecedare (talk) 19:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)