User talk:Factsmatter45

June 2020
Hello, I'm ProcrasinatingReader. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Police riot have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 14:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

They are absolutely constructive. The page is false. You allow antifa propaganda to be published and you're creating further divide. The readers deserve truth of propaganda Factsmatter45 (talk) 14:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia isn't the place to air political grievances. The concept of police rioting isn't "ANTIFA propaganda". I'm sure you'd have an opportunity to improve the page, if you wish, with good faith edits to improve the page. It's classed as a page that could do with improvements, and I'm sure your passion, in a constructive form, would greatly help improve it for readers. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 14:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Police riot. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

You are wrong. By deleting the facts you are intentionally spreading propaganda. I will be reporting you and Wikipedia to the FBI who is actively investing domestic terrorism and links to antifa. Factsmatter45 (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Police riot, you may be blocked from editing. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

You are a joke. Factsmatter45 (talk) 14:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Thanoscar21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Police riot, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thanoscar21talk, contribs 14:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

None of this content has a reliable source. It's all propaganda for ANTIFA. but I'll add a source anyways. But you and I both know. No matter where my source is, you're going to try and say it's not reliable. Factsmatter45 (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * If you look at my userpage, I state that I'm anti-ANTIFA. Thanks, Thanoscar21talk, contribs 14:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * You aren't even adding sources to your edits. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Police riots edits
Hi, I understand that you want to contribute to the page Police riot, but it seems that the edits you are making are not constructive to the article itself. The page may be protected in the future to stop edit warring in the future. If you could add sources to the claim at hand with, that could help your case. Otherwise, please refrain from adding information without sources. Thank you!

-- 14:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Let me make it really easy. What you're doing is disruptive. One more attempt to insert your opinion into articles and you'll be blocked indefinitely. Glen 14:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)