User talk:Factstopcrying

January 2020
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Desmond Napoles, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

If you try block truthful information and silence the reality of this poor child again. Do not make this violation again Factstopcrying (talk) 03:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Your recent edits to User talk:Factstopcrying could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

You can try all you want but you hold on legal defence. Factstopcrying (talk) 03:08, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

You cant even construct a simple sentence. You have no legal defence in this case and will take on the full force of the law. Your continued support of the pedofilia ring has been noted and your choices to hide information and not allow truth to be apart of Wikipedia has been noted. You have shown signs you enjoy this work and enjoy living in the pain cause to this child by his mother and the drug ring he was forced into. You have shown no remorse for you repulsive actions and have defended the pedofilia, drug and rape community multiple times Factstopcrying (talk) 03:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Reliable sources were named it was your choices that they were not of you taste that was the problem. You yourself hud the truth sourced by people across the globe in defence of this poor child. And you want even allow the small truths of his tortured life Factstopcrying (talk) 03:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

BLP Discretionary Sanctions alert
NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)