User talk:Fadew

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting 4 "~"s at the end.

Replaceable fair use File:The Soft Cavalry.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Soft Cavalry.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Pro-tip
Edit warring while evading your block is not the most brilliant idea, but by all means, keep it up and you'll get blocked again even quicker. VAXIDICAE💉 14:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

If you can show me what wrong I've done from this account, even a single one, then I would leave from Wikipedia right away. I've been blocked previously while I was new to Wikipedia, and didn't know a lot of stuffs, but after getting blocked, I spent numerous hours learning about Wikipedia, and when finally I'm on my journey to provide information to Wikipedia, I'm again being warned? Please even recheck my previous accounts edits, while I admit and repent my few wrong doings, I've done nothing else but good except these on that account. And on this account, can you point out any vandalism or any wrong doings done by me? Because of some certain established users activities towards me, I feel like I've committed some horrible crimes! Don't treat me like I'm a first degree murder convicted fugitive, people make mistakes, they change an turn around, so did I. Please my humble request to you guys, don't destroy my hard works and sheer passion for Wikipedia once again for some silly mistakes I've done while I was a new comer and so naïve. Shoaib Rahman (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * When you were blocked indefinitely under your 6 accounts, what did you think "indefinite" meant? Make a new account and keep messing around? You cannot edit. You are blocked. Stop. VAXIDICAE💉  14:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I bet you are (/were) a bully in your high school and probably even racist ain't you? And as far as I'm concerned, I know about 3 accounts and I also held accountability for my 3 accounts, IDK about 6 accounts.Shoaib Rahman (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It appears you are having trouble with your memory, so here's a reminder:, , , , , . VAXIDICAE💉  14:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I never did create those other 3. I use an corporate IP, I won't take responsibility for other users. I take full accountably for my 3 accounts, why wouldn't I do the same for the rest, if they really belonged to me? And I've checked the Wikipedia's page for blocked users, and it said "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a block, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule. However, this does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a blocked editor (obviously helpful changes can be allowed to stand). So, the edits that you reverted, weren't they "HELPFUL?" or were they pieces of misinformation, vandalism?Shoaib Rahman (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No because you continually ignored consensus at the Urbanowicz AFD and you are evading a block, so anyone is free to revert you as they please. VAXIDICAE💉  15:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Can you do me a favor? Just mention me to any administrator, I thought you were one, but checked you're not. No more arguing or self defensing with you, let the administrator decide what to do with my "VALID' edits. Well, not sure if some of your friends are admins, then things would only go on one direction. It's like I'm defending the indefensible? Why the heck my naive-ness and early mistakes would count on my current account, where no wrong doings are being done, if they do get done, just block me? Shoaib Rahman (talk) 15:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

And I didn't ignore "Urbanowicz AFD" or anything, IDK what even that (AFD) means. Can you link me to a page about AFD? or whatever that is? Shoaib Rahman (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)