User talk:Fadisio

March 2022
Hello Fadisio. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fadisio. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 16:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi 331dot I am a Muslim and have been using this bank because of its halal compliance that's why thought to create an article. I hope it's ok. Thanks for your guidance.
 * If you have no affiliation with the bank(other than using its services) and do not communicate with them about this, that is fine. Keep in mind that an article about the bank must not just document its existence, but summarize what independent reliable sources say about it on their own(no interviews, press releases, or announcements of routine business activities like the commencement of operations or other routine transactions). Most of the sources you use currently could probably be removed, to pass AFC you only need to summarize at least three sources with significant coverage. Please read Your First Article and use the new user tutorial. Writing a new article is the most difficult task to perform on Wikipedia, and it will take some effort. 331dot (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes sir, I read it a week ago and after started creating a draft in the sandbox. Then later I learned about AFC and submitted for review. After seeing your comment I removed unreliable sources and updated article so it meets Wikipedia requirements. I hope its ok.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fair Neobank (March 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fair Neobank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fair Neobank, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fair_Neobank Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:331dot&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fair_Neobank reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 16:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fair Neobank has been accepted
 Fair Neobank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Fair_Neobank help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! TheWikiholic (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Fair Bank for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fair Bank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fair Bank until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ovinus (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)