User talk:Faendalimas/Archive 1

Harriet
I would be interested in reading your original 1995 paper on Harriet the Tortoise, is it online anywhere? Zerbey 17:39, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 * sorry the original paper is not online, just the rewrite of it from Reptilia which is the link on wiki I put in. It says essentially the same without all the detail. The DNA results were published by Scott Davis and Ed Louis of Texas A&M University so they are the contact authors for that. Faendalimas 06:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Elseya irwini.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Elseya irwini.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 21:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Elseya_irwini.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Elseya_irwini.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Macrochelodina expansa.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Macrochelodina expansa.gif. However, it currently is missing a tag to explain its copyright status. It could be deleted, unless we can clarify the precise nature of the license of the image.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Addhoc 17:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Rheodytes
The page Rheodytes is a redirect right now. When you click on a redirect and it sends you to the article it links to, there should be a little link just under the article title that reads "Redirected from [PAGENAME]." That PAGENAME will be a link to the actual redirect itself, allowing you to edit the page.

I've linked directly to the edit page for Rheodytes here, for your reference as well.  bibliomaniac 1  5  20:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles needs you!
Ahoy there! We're conducting our annual purge of the participants list for WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, in an effort to make sure our members stay current with events at the WikiProject. If you would like to renew your participation with the WikiProject, simply drop by the participants list and re-add your name to the list in alphabetical order using the following format:. Also feel free to add your specialties or points of interest. If you don't have the time or don't feel like rejoining, then ignore this request; you can rejoin at any time you'd like. Cheers,  bibliomaniac 1  5  00:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Chelodina canni
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chelodina canni, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.carettochelys.com/chelodina/chelodina_canni.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Please follow the instructions at WP:Donating copyrighted material, otherwise the content in the Chelodina canni article will have to be rewritten. Thanks,  The left orium  17:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * already done that it is no longer the same as the website I previously wrote an article on. Faendalimas (talk) 19:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? The article still includes information from .  The left orium  19:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry I get what you mean now. The original issue was with a different page than that I have rewritten it since then, I am still rewriting it and it will be ok when I am done. The articles it contains info from was also written by me, and originally published by myself. But I will get it to requirements in a day or so. My real name is Scott Thomson the original author for the description of this species. Faendalimas (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Uberima.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Uberima.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Pleurodira
I fixed a small but important error that was causing some formatting problems. The "name" parameter means the name of the template, and shouldn't have any wikilinks in it. Other than that it looks great!  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Saw-shelled Turtle
Thank you so much for contacting me about the welcome changes you made to this article. I am thrilled you have tasken the time to do the work. I am a complete amateur when it comes to reptiles so I really appreciate your input. I just happened to find one of these turtles walking across my driveway in outside Cooktown, Qld, and thought I should write an article about them as they are so interesting. Am in ZMcLeod Ganj, Dharamshala, India at the moment in an internet cafe with uncertain connections so I'll keep this short. Thanks again - do please contact me again any time and I may contact you if I find anything I think may need some expert advice. Cheers and best wishes. John Hill (talk) 06:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Galápagos tortoise subfamily
Hello Faendalimas, I have a question regarding your recent edit to Galapagos tortoise. Is it correct that the subfamily is | subfamilia = Testudininae ?

The wikilink directs to the same page as the family Testudininae. Minglex (talk) 14:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Tortoise taxobox
Hello, I noticed you undid my revision to the taxobox on Tortoise. Aside from the suborder (which we can force that to display if you'd like), what else makes it "unsuitable"? I'd like to know, since I'm one of the people working on that template. Any improvements you can suggest are vital. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 00:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll go set the already-programmed suborders of the Testudines to always display, since you've expressed that is important. At Wikipedia, we always try to put the taxon's authority in the taxobox, even if the name of the paper is unavailable. However, I'll see if I can't find the paper so it can be added to the references section. The automatic taxobox should be capable of displaying the map and ref tags just like the taxobox-- the advantage is it allows an entire branch of taxonomy to be updated at the same time-- for example, if the Amphibians and Reptiles WikiProject has thus far refused to move forward with Sauropsida in place of Reptilia, but should they ever agree to move forward, a simple edit or two will automatically update all automated reptiles' taxonomies.

I'm placing a copy of the automated taxobox here for your convenience, as well as references below this comment. Please let me know if there's anything else that can be improved in this implementation of the automatic taxobox. Thanks! Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 04:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Bidgee (talk) 15:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Apologies
My apologies for not reading your email sooner. I rarely check that account. I will however look into the situation ASAP. Cheers Zoo  Pro  02:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Myuchelys, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''Per policy I am afraid my friend however if the correct course of action is followed then no one can complain that correct procedures were not followed. Kind Regards'' Zoo  Pro  06:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks ZooPro, I am trying to be careful here and have examined those policies. I am extrememly careful that anything I do say is only from my published research, like all scientists I have a mountain of unpublished material on turtles also, which is a shame for me, but it is not usable here as per the No Original Research Policy. I am being careful to follow the Expertise section of the NPoV tutorial. If I overstep please feel free to tell me. Cheers. Faendalimas (talk) 13:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries, I also have some Conflicts of Interest in here that most users are aware of (the zoo i work at) though I do edit the article all be it with great caution, I generally find discussing things with other editors about changes to the article helps me avoid all issues and 9 times out of 10 another user will make the changes for me. Kind regards Zoo  Pro  13:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)