User talk:FaerieInGrey/July2006

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Lost 19:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Ooh, help pages :) I could use those. Thank you! FaerieInGrey 19:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. Please do let me know if I can help any further -- Lost 19:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Translating French Jacques Félix Emmanuel Hamelin Article
FaerieInGrey, Thankyou so much for offering to do that. I see you haven't been here that long, so unless you want to, don't get too hung up on the intricacies of linking and categories etc. I can easily do that once the text is in English. Sing out if there's anything else I can do. Regards -- I@n 08:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Excellent job. Thanks again -- I@n 14:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Recent Updates
Welcome again to Wikipedia. Thank you but what did I do?-- Dakota ~ 20:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Well you do a great job also. Thank you. Have seen these anti vandalism tools some really handy js to help with anti-vandalism.-- Dakota  ~ 20:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Re your reversion of Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo
Actually you were right the first time. The edit you reverted was a vandalistic personal attack from a banned editor. Thanks for your help anyways. --LBMixPro&lt;Sp e ak 20:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm too new to respond on your talk page, but the reason I didn't mean to revert it was that it was on a talkpage and I wasn't sure those were allowed to be censored as such. ♥ FaerieInGrey 00:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

YOU DELETED MY ARTICLE!!!!
HELLO, I AM THE PERSON WHOSE ARTICLE YOU DELETED. I APPRECIATE YOUR CONCERN FOR THE FEELINGS OF OTHERS. I WAS SIMPLY TRYING TO EXPRESS A THOUGHT SHARED BY MANY THROUGH A NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW. PLEASE DO NOT CALL THAT VANDALISM AND REFRAIN FROM DELETING MORE TRUTHFUL ARTICLES IN THE FUTURE. I THANK YOU. PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS COMMENT.


 * Please sign comments using four tildes, as I'm not sure who you are...? Which article are you speaking about? ♥ FaerieInGrey 22:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

OH, SO YOU DELETED SO MANY TRUTHFUL ARTICLES YOU CANNOT REMEMBER WHICH ONE IS WHICH? OH WELL, I DON'T BLAME YOU. I SUPPOSE I WAS A LITTLE TOO OVER THE TOP. FORGIVE ME IF I OFFENDED YOU. I WAS TALKING ABOUT THAT RELIGIOUS ARTICLE.


 * Don't worry, you just deleted some rant about Christianity. Best. --Lo2u (T • C) 22:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, thank you.♥ FaerieInGrey 00:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I stand behind my deletion of your comment, and no, I have never deleted a "truthful article" to my knowledge and never intentionally will. ♥ FaerieInGrey 00:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Vegetarianism
The correct spelling is devoloped and not developed?? =| --70.18.248.120 05:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The article was coming up as the spelling being "developped", which is why I was reverting it back to "developed". ♥ FaerieInGrey 05:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh! I'm sorry! I corrected a "developped" to "developed" mistake which the person then reverted - I saw your edit as the person reverting it again, but you were fixing a different mistake. Big apologies! ♥ FaerieInGrey 05:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks...
... for the barnstar!!! -- Lost 12:46, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I did not vandalise any article on Bulbasaur
You asked me not to vandalise articles as i did to Bulbasaur, this cannot be true as I had not visited the said article until you notified me of its presence, perhaps the ip address was confused with mine.

Your VandalProof Application
Dear FaerieInGrey,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Gl e n 11:59, 29 July 2006 (UTC)