User talk:Fafhrdrn1154

Young King OURs
I've redirested your page to Young King OURs as both the articles are on the same subject--Notedgrant (talk) 14:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If your article satisfies WP's criteria you can undo my edit here Young King and WP:BOLD--Notedgrant (talk) 14:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Northwest Passage (newspaper)


The article Northwest Passage (newspaper) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 00:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Cage of Eden
I have nominated Cage of Eden, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Cage of Eden. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Farix (t &#124; c) 12:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Correction to Quicksilver Times page
Greetings,

Data point: the editor named was Paul Terence Becker. He could correctly be called Paul Becker Jr., as his father's first name was Paul, but Terry went by Terry and is probably best -- and most accurately -- styled as Terry Becker. Feel free to query me if you have additional questions.

All best, Easternpika (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Underground Press Syndicate members


The article List of Underground Press Syndicate members has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:ISNOT and WP:STAND.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 19:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Underground Press Syndicate members for deletion
The article List of Underground Press Syndicate members is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Underground Press Syndicate members until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  ttonyb (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * You may have meant to request an unblock of an IP range, but what you actually did was request an unblock of this account (which at the time was not blocked), giving "Abusing multiple accounts: TRATTOOO" as your reason for unblocking. It looked very much like a mishandled attempt to request an unblock for TRATTOOO, which made no sense unless you were the same person. I guess that this was an innocent mistake, and I would simply unblock you if it were not for one doubt in my mind. Since you have an account which was not blocked, you should have been able to edit, so why were you trying to request an unblock for an IP range? If you can give a satisfactory answer to that then it will probably be reasonable to unblock you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know if this account is a sock or not, but the IP he was editing from when he requested unblock is hardblocked, so he would not be able to edit even if he was logged in. I am unfamiliar with TRATTOOO. Still, from a purely technical aspect, I see no obvious evidence that this account is a sockpuppet. J.delanoy gabs adds  02:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your attention to this unblock request. I may well have bungled the original request to unblock the IP range; there was a text which read (more or less) "cut and paste this in your user page to request an unblock," and I did so. I was in fact unable to edit from this machine even when logged in. Fafhrdrn1154 (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. I appreciate the time and effort spent reviewing this request. Fafhrdrn1154 (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freezing wraparound.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Freezing wraparound.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Avatar 23.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Avatar 23.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fountain of light 12.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fountain of light 12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Long Beach Free Press


The article Long Beach Free Press has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable newspaper. No indepth coverage. Only ref is a database entry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Young magazine 03 10 2014 cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Young magazine 03 10 2014 cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Still from "They Won't Forget" showing Lana Turner.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Still from "They Won't Forget" showing Lana Turner.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯ xplicit 08:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Docrankin1921selfport.png


The file File:Docrankin1921selfport.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Docrankin1921selfport.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Docrankin1921selfport.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Old Mole 25.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Old Mole 25.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)