User talk:Fagjerome

Welcome!

Hello, Fagjerome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Stephen Garlock Liu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  00:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Stephen Garlock Liu


The article Stephen Garlock Liu has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  00:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stephen Garlock Liu


The article Stephen Garlock Liu has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * possibly a complete hoax, almost certainly a non-notable player who doesn't meet the WP:GNG nor WP:NSPORTS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 03:56, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Garlock Liu


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Stephen Garlock Liu, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The-Pope (talk) 12:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The article Stephen Garlock Liu has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

What are you doing?
First you steal Lionel Messi's article and now James Ha? Before you do much more and get yourself blocked from editing, please read the association football notability guidelines and work out which of the criteria does Lui qualify for an article here. If you are Stephen Lui yourself, or know him personally, then please read WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO before you edit again. I have moved the article into your userspace until you sort out the mess - see User:Fagjerome/Stephen Garlock Liu. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 14:05, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * That is looking better. Have you identified which of the notability criteria Lui qualifies? If you don't make it clear, then the article may be deleted again. Reply here if you want to know anything else. The-Pope (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2011 (UTC)