User talk:Fagopyrum

Welcome!

Hello, Fagopyrum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! TN X Man 14:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Reference Question
Hello! You asked a question at new contributor's help page. I have fixed your reference at Xenobiotic. In order to make a reference, you need to place the reference between a. The at the bottom of the page automatically displays the references. I hope this helps. TN X Man 14:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aquatic toxicology, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Aquatic toxicology was changed by Fagopyrum (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-08-01T14:56:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I dont see any obscenities. Am I missing something obvious? Maybe it's your username?  Though I wouldnt think ClueBot would be looking at the username.  Either way I think you can ignore this.  —  Soap  —  14:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I reported it on ClueBot's false positives page and was told that it was the 666 in the page listing that was the problem, not your username.  —  Soap  —  15:02, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies Fagopyrum. 666 is "Satin's number" according to some USA religious nuts. ClueBot is just a software robot programmed, hopefully, to revert obvious vandalism. ClueBot screwed up here, it is ClueBot's problem and not yours, so don't worry about it. Your edits are good! --Epipelagic (talk) 08:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Your references
Actually most of the references you are now adding to articles are not appropriate. It is not just a matter of adding any research papers you can find. There can be thousands of papers written about notable topics, but that doesn't mean that every paper published should be added as a reference. If a research paper is useful enough to cite in an article, then it probably is because it contains useful information that should be added into the body of the article. Please use discrimination and don't just add any old references. --Epipelagic (talk) 04:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:38, 13 October 2010 (UTC)