User talk:Fagould

Welcome!
Hi Fagould! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: My Fair Lidy (July 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:My Fair Lidy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:My_Fair_Lidy Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DreamRimmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:My_Fair_Lidy reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛  𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜  02:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: My Fair Lidy (July 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:My Fair Lidy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:My_Fair_Lidy Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:My_Fair_Lidy reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Draft:My Fair Lidy
Per the request in your edit summary, I have deleted Draft:My Fair Lidy under speedy deletion criterion G7 (request by author). If you change your mind at any point in the future, feel free to ask at my talk page or Requests for undeletion. Happy editing. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 19:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

 * I am pointing out that the GAG entry is misinforming people right now and that those terms being debated should be removed from the description and handled elsewhere. You have all these WP procedures in place but they only delay the final edits because of political opinions and in the interim are half wrong. Remove the contentious adjectives from the entry so that it can be debated until the terms are approved by some majority. If not, leave it vague. fagould (talk) 15:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

 * I am pointing out that the GAG entry is misinforming people right now and that those terms being debated should be removed from the description and handled elsewhere. You have all these WP procedures in place but they only delay the final edits because of political opinions and in the interim are half wrong. Remove the contentious adjectives from the entry so that it can be debated until the terms are approved by some majority. If not, leave it vague. fagould (talk) 15:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)