User talk:Fahadrana123

Nomination for deletion of Template:114
Template:114 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Train2104 (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chaudary naurez Shakoor khan


The article Chaudary naurez Shakoor khan has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 05:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Khokhar, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''

I am sorry but the website which you provided as a source for the Ismaili content is unreliable as support for the statement because it is practically a self-published source.'' Sitush (talk) 08:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Your addition to Khokhar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''

I removed your original use of the image as it was hosted off-wiki. You then uploaded it & reinserted in the article. This is a clear copyright violation, especially since it appears to be a film/TV still. It is not even necessary to the article, so please do not add it again.'' Sitush (talk) 15:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Your addition to Khokhar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 09:22, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to Khokhar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 20:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Please can you tell me what it is that you do not understand about the Wikipedia policies regarding copyright violations? If you persist in adding copyrighted material as you are doing then it is quite likely that someone will block you from contributing at all, since you are placing Wikipedia in a legally difficult position. I am watching this talk page & so will see any response from you. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Actually, a better link for you to read is Copyright violations. I am happy to help you to understand this if you are having problems after reading it. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 13:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)