User talk:FaheyUSMC

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to The Dating Guy, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. LK (talk) 07:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * You have yet to actually defend your position using proper debating tactics. Instead, you and Elizium23 have used the exact same thing - a broad generalization of the Wikipedia "rules and regulations" to support your claims.  However, I have gone into detail multiple times to show you how Wikipedia actually suggests that YOU are both wrong.  Until you do so, DO NOT remove the area that has been added as controversy.
 * Furthermore, the article does not slander, defame, or libel any person. The article makes no mention of certainty in the claims, and only states, "Here is a claim made, it's a broiling controversy."  By your logic, unless it is picked up by a major news source, there is no verifiable way to actually ascertain the legitimacy of the claims.  And until one party brings the other to court (which if Teletoon were not guilty, they would have done already, or served a cease and desist, which they have not), it is not likely to see print in a major source.
 * I will be making sure the controversy is, once again, added. You have no business taking it down until you can justify, with specifics, where there are violations.  if this is an attempt to get me to breach the "three-revert" rule, it's not going to work. FaheyUSMC (talk) 09:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Fahey
If you want to add that "controversy" section in, you'll need a reliable source. The forum doesn't cut it. At least three people have told you this. Find a reliable source and there won't be a problem. @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons ► Markab -@ 17:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to The Dating Guy. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 03:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * When you can provide a sufficient defense beyond the usual "Go read the rules", then I will take your opinion into account. However, to date your only responses have been, "No, now go read the rules here and here" without providing actual, specific details as to where you think there have been violations.
 * I, personally, have gone through the rules several times and asked myself several questions before 1) writing the section; 2) every rebuttal as to why it should be included, and; 3) provided specific examples as to how Wikipedia's own rules have completely backed up my claims. As I said, you and the other two taking your side have not provided relevant, specific points as to where violations have occurred. FaheyUSMC (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

sockpuppet accusation
You may wish to look at the pages of user KSEVWatch. You are accused of using him as a sockpuppet. I am willing to suspect that an honest checkuser would find you not even in the same city given that the username is related to a US radio station (KSEV) and the user's first edits were to a politician who owns said radio station, indicating that KSEVWatch is likely a resident of that city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.243.192.222 (talk) 06:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Talk page access
Given your disrespect for various of our policies I have revoked your talk page access. If you have anything to say, you can email an administrator. Drmies (talk) 20:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)