User talk:Fahim viper

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Operation Storm have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Operation Storm was changed by Fahim viper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895187 on 2021-01-17T10:35:10+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abul Hayat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abul Hayat was changed by Fahim viper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96674 on 2021-01-17T10:46:58+00:00

May 2021
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Drag queen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 04:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Cerebral726. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Billy Eichner have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Cerebral726 (talk) 12:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Brahmi script without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   — DaxServer (talk to me) 12:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tajiks. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''That was not a "spelling mistake". The spelling "Iranian" is the WP:COMMONNAME. -'' LouisAragon (talk) 21:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.