User talk:Fahimulkarim3

Speedy deletion nomination of Fahim Ul Karim
Hello Fahimulkarim3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fahim Ul Karim for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Fahim Ul Karim, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Fahim Ul Karim. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Fahim Ul Karim. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:17, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:43, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I've blocked you briefly because you ignored warnings not to remove a speedy deletion tag on an article you created yourself. You need to listen to people when they try to tell you about Wikipedia's rules.  I have also deleted the article.  Unlike social networking websites, Wikipedia is not a means for self-promotion.  It is an encyclopedia, and it has inclusion criteria.  You can see what is required for a person and how we measure suitability for a topic.  When your block ends, please take the time to read through our core content policies, this guide to creating articles on Wikipedia, and this introduction to Wikipedia.  If you agree to follow our rules, I will immediately unblock you, and you can return to editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)