User talk:Fahrenheit666

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Fahrenheit666! Thank you for your contributions. I am Kerry Raymond and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Kerry (talk) 22:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

DS Alert
QuackGuru ( talk ) 17:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi
Please do not impute ulterior motives on my actions (that I am desperate). I will not go on playing with words such as what official is or not, it's the largest organization and is registered. If you're going to play with word semantics, go for it, you'd be alone. Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That's that last encounter I am having with you to clarify what would be obvious for most (and the reason why it is in your talkpage I am replying) by now.
 * The Muslim Council of Britain is a national representative Muslim umbrella body with over 500 affiliated national, regional and local organisations, mosques, charities and schools.


 * The largest national representative of British Muslim associations, mosques and schools.


 * It's the de facto official organ of the British Muslim associations (by their own mandate). For anyone to claim otherwise (and defeat it's defacto purpose) they have to rely on constructs and word semantics to define what is official and what is not (arbitrary parameters with strong selection bias). This raises more issues on editors intentions rather than plain simple observations on the role of the organization (and its mandate) itself.


 * But don't bother my desperation (for merely pointing the arbitrary nature of such an exclusion) and shouting and covering of my own mistake (by your own words), I know where to stop. Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 19:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Firearms policy in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William of Orange ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Firearms_policy_in_the_United_Kingdom check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Firearms_policy_in_the_United_Kingdom?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Redcar (UK Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservative Party ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Redcar_%28UK_Parliament_constituency%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Redcar_%28UK_Parliament_constituency%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Hi Fahrenheit666! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Irish Republican Army that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.

Hello, I'm FDW777. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Irish Republican Army seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

In addition the Irish Republican Army article, and similar articles, are subject to a 1-revert-rule restriction, meaning no more than one revert in a 24 hour period. FDW777 (talk) 06:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Denniss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to German battleship Bismarck have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Denniss (talk) 01:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * If you continue to edit-war and alter sourced information, you'll be blocked from editing. Parsecboy (talk) 08:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * What's the source for a shell penetrating Hood's "thin" deck armour? Fahrenheit666 (talk) 09:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It's in the article. You've been blocked for 24 hours for edit-warring and disruptive editing. When the block expires, please use the talk page. Parsecboy (talk) 10:28, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No it isn't. The claim that a shell penetrated the deck armour is UNSOURCED. That's why I removed it. You do not own this article. Fahrenheit666 (talk) 10:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * "At 06:00, Hood was completing the second turn to port when Bismarck's fifth salvo hit. Two of the shells landed short, striking the water close to the ship, but at least one of the 38 cm armour-piercing shells struck Hood and penetrated her thin deck armour. The shell reached Hood's rear ammunition magazine and detonated 112 t (110 long tons) of cordite propellant.[61]". That footnote points to Bercuson & Herwig. That you are unable to follow a simple hyperlink is your problem, not mine or anyone else's. If you continue to disrupt the article after your block expires, it will be lengthened. Find something else to do. Parsecboy (talk) 11:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I will decide what I do. You do not own the article. Fahrenheit666 (talk) 19:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You are of course free to decide what you do, but you will not be free of the consequences. Rest assured that if you edit-war again, you'll be blocked again. Parsecboy (talk) 23:08, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Austin S. Miller
Interesting: some of that weirdness is enlightened by the comments underneath this article. BTW that page copies our text. Drmies (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
A. C. Santacruz &#8258; Please ping me! 15:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Your recent editing history at Sophie Labelle shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Selfstudier (talk) 11:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)