User talk:Fair analyst

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pat Condell. --A pinhead (talk) 17:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Pat Condell. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * There is also a three-revert rule violation in there, and some personal attacks in edit summaries. Keep this up and you will find yourself blocked for a longer period. --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. PhilKnight (talk) 21:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

If you continue to attempt to defame Pat Condell, I shall report you to the IT Abuse Department of the University of Warwick where you carried out such acts. Sending defamatory information is against their IT policies. I will also contact your internet service provider Virgin Media's abuse department, as such acts are also in contravention of their acceptable use policy.--A pinhead (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)