User talk:Fairytale65

Speedy deletion nomination of Haunted Party
Hello Fairytale65,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Haunted Party for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Antonio Fernando
Hello Fairytale65,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Antonio Fernando for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Anthony Ilott, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Haunted Party, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 16:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Anthony Ilott, you may be blocked from editing. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  18:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Aron&April654321. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)