User talk:Faiyaz Khalid

Sockpuppet investigation
McGeddon (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Faiyaz Khalid


A tag has been placed on User:Faiyaz Khalid, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. McGeddon (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Good Afternoon
Looking at the sockpuppet investigation, it looks to me as if all you have been doing, using multiple accounts, is creating articles about yourself (which are not warranted in an encyclopedia as you are not notable by WP:N standards), using your user page to host writings about yourself, and even inserting links from encyclopedia pages to your user page. If you want to be unblocked and allowed to edit Wikipedia, I suggest you need to explain in clear terms why all of that was wrong (just claiming that you understand the rules is probably not sufficient, so I think you would need to show that you understand). Also, you would improve your chances if you explained what you would do to help develop the project if allowed back. 823510731 (talk) 16:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)