User talk:FaizaCherie

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Baby GirL (July 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Man way  23:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:FaizaCherie Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Manway&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:FaizaCherie reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

New article
Hello. A few notes about your new draft.


 * I've restored it temporarily in order to give you a chance to prove that the owner of the content approves of the license provided. You can do that by copying one of the texts at Example requests for permission and sending it to our address.
 * Even though you might have copyright permission, the text still sounds a bit like an advertisement. See WP:ARTSPAM.
 * The subject must pass our general notability guidelines. I have not checked to see if they do so. If you think they don't and want to retract the article, you can tag the page as db-g7. (Don't be ashamed if so, new contributors are allowed to make occasional mistakes).

In any case, good luck, and thanks for your contributions. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...I started creating this page for Kim Ehly the Writer of this play, but would it be easier copyright wise to have Kim Ehly herself doing the page? That way there are no questions of ownership of the material. Or should I just continue to do the page? Although I don't understand how I submit the information of her ownership.

FaizaCherie (talk) 16:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC) FaizaCherie
 * Hi, you are writing on your own talk page, not the article's talk page, but I have deduced that you are referring to Draft:Baby GirL. To answer the first part of your question, the writer would have a conflict of interest and is strongly discouraged from editing the article herself. Looking at the last version of the draft before the copyright notice was slapped on it, there are a few other issues beyond copyright.  A few things to keep in mind: Wikipedia is not a webhost, it's an encyclopedia.  Submissions must be written in proper encyclopedic tone, and must be largely presented using reliable, secondary sources.  Copy-pasting a plot synopsis, even if it comes from the writer of the play, doesn't provide us with the objective perspective that an encyclopedia should have, and looks a lot like promotion.  Using rhetorical questions such as, "What if you were conceived twice in one lifetime" and cutesy phrasing such as "I mean, understand?" is bound to be rejected by the community.  Better: prose that isn't tied to selling the premise, but that explains it straight: "A character is born twice, once by accident and a second time by an infertile couple" or whatever the case may be. (I didn't delve too deeply into it.)  Also important, you need to properly establish the subject's notability. Not everything on the planet is suitable for inclusion at Wikipedia, and the community doesn't care much for content that is submitted to promote a subject.  Notability in this case is determined one of two ways: 1) The general notability guideline states that a subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage (not passing mentions) from reliable sources (magazines, newspapers, television shows, not press releases) that are independent of the subject (not the play's or the author's blogs, not related to or paid for by the subject).  2) Another way to determine notability is if the subject (a play) has specific notability criteria, but I can't find anything specific to plays at WP:N--although if the writer has an article at Wikipedia and is deemed notable, then the play would be as well.  Your first priority should be to find sources that assert that the play is notable, otherwise it will likely get deleted and your work would be in vain.  Hope that helps, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)