User talk:Faizan/Archive 4

A cheeseburger for you!

 * Hot breakfast! Yummy.  Fai  zan  04:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cheers,   Strike   Σagle    04:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * sorry if my edits seem like following you! :) I have more than 700 pages in my watchlist... ;) Cheers,   Strike   Σagle    05:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Come on man, it's funny. I can give you watchlist token too. No problem over that.. Besides I have 3000 pages in watchlist. . Fai  zan  05:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

 * Ty. A record of Vandalized talk is necessary for Anti-Vandalism editors. Fai  zan  09:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

spree.co.za
Hi Faizan. spree is a south african online website that retails clothing. the website has recently launched and is now airing a TV commercial. People who are searching for spree are finding the spree river and the spree ecommerce platform. It is for this reason that I have listed spree.co.za on the page. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. (Spree.co.za (talk) 09:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC))
 * First of all, you have a promotional username, and usernames like that are not acceptable. You have been reported, and please don't add such spam links to articles again, like you did at a disambiguation page. Fai  zan  09:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Help
Our next target is INS Jyoti and we would love your help! Cheers,  TheStrike   Σagle   11:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Coming... Fai  zan  11:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hurrah. I did not note it. Thanks Strike. Fai  zan  12:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Jujyfruit
Hey Faizan,

I'm not really worked up over the change. It just made me chuckle that the caption read "an assortment of sorted jujyfruit." It's logically inconsistent. You can keep the change or discard it; either way.

Thanks for the head's up. I don't ever really edit wiki, but I took a moment to do that and didn't realize you needed to leave a note explaining what you did for small clerical things.

Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.123.197.35 (talk) 18:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Chris. I regret for it, that was unnecessary. Welcome to Wikipedia. Fai  zan  08:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Why?
I believe you should put back i had edited because there was no mention of the War Dogs in that paragraph and that is why i edited it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polkinator (talk • contribs) 00:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Polkinator. Your edit was not satisfactory for an encyclopedia. You wrote: "Don't forget the War Dogs!". This type of statement or the method of expressing it in an encyclopedia is not appropriate. You are welcome to improve it. Fai  zan  07:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 TheStrike   Σagle   07:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

A milestone!
Hurrah, have crossed 10,000+ edit mark. Kudos to the Wikiteachers, Admins, Friends, Cooperators, Brothers, Sisters, Ladies and Gentlemen. This was not possible without your lead. Mar4d, Darkness Shines, Strike Eagle, Bbb23, Andrew, Ascetic Rose, Samar, Arctic Kangaroo, Yintan, Wamiq, Zyma, Tyrol and INeverCry. Fai zan  12:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support   TheStrike   Σagle   12:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * lol. What is that? Thanks. Fai  zan  12:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 *  TheStrike   Σagle   12:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Congrats!  Yinta n  14:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Nothing to do without your return. Fai  zan  15:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

 Mar4d  ( talk ) 16:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, Faizan, congratulations, I think. The number of edits you've done each month for the last 3 months is very high. Don't burn yourself out. :-) Remember, there is life outside of Wikipedia. Regards.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Bbb. Actually I am still lagging behind the active Wikipedians, I want to be one of the most active Wikipedians and still there is a lot to do. Due to my exams, I could not manage the completion of my targets, but will improve after exams. Thanking you again. Fai  zan  07:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Congrats dude! Arctic Kangaroo (  ✉  •  ✎  ) 09:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kangaroo! Fai  zan  09:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations on your milestone, and thanks. May you have a hundred thousand more. Samar Talk 10:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Samar. Fai  zan  10:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

yes
All the edits made to the page will be counted as mainspace....... :)  TheStrike   Σagle   07:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Strike. I will move it later on. Have a final glimpse there. Fai  zan  08:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 *  TheStrike   Σagle   08:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I feel it's good enough..you can move to mainspace now....however, I noticed a copy-vio which I mostly fixed....I hope there are no more of them! :)  TheStrike   Σagle   08:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Dude thanks, without your and DS's help it was not possible to make it ready. It has been moved. Nominating it for DYK now. Any suggestion of the statement for DYK? Fai  zan  08:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Strike Eagle Fai  zan  08:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ....that Pakistani Government estimates 100,000 Biharis living in Bangladesh were killed by Bengalis after the Bangladesh Liberation War?  TheStrike   Σagle   08:48, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I want to see you there as an Expander too. Then how to fill the template regarding expander? In the author 2? See this link. Fai  zan  08:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah..you can add author 3..so on..   TheStrike   Σagle   08:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I want to write: "Created by Faizan. Expanded by Faizan and Strike Eagle" Fai  zan  08:54, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Not possible...you have to follow that way else the template won't work!  TheStrike   Σagle   08:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You could do that after the template is substituted...I will do it!  TheStrike   Σagle   08:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oka. Fai  zan  09:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * But I think changing the template might hamper the DYKupdate bot which has to deliver credits.. ;)  TheStrike   Σagle   09:03, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Leave it, looking for an image but cannot find it. Can take 3 minutes for a search? Fai  zan  09:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Image is fine but what caption do you want to give?  TheStrike   Σagle   09:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Protests in Bangladesh against Bihari Razakars, Will not it look smaller in the preview? We should leave the image? Fai  zan  09:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

We can......noms with images generally take longer to make to main page...  TheStrike   Σagle   09:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hope that it is accepted now. But if it is not accepted after 5 days of creation, will it be ignored? Secondly you can review it? Fai  zan  09:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No, it must be nominated before 5 days....there's no time for reviewing...no..I can't review it!....BTW the hook used in the nomination must exist in the article...in this case, the hook you used in nom does not exist in the article......you should fix it..  TheStrike   Σagle   09:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * nominated before 5 days or reviewed before 5 days? The hook is the image? Fai  zan  09:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It should be nominated before 5 days, review can take some time. The hook is the statement that you give for DYK, it should be present in the article. -sarvajna (talk) 09:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok sarvajna, but how can I nominate an article before its creation? Fai  zan  09:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * he means that it must be nominated within 5 days of its creation..   TheStrike   Σagle   09:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It was created on 4 June, and nominated on 5 June. The hook is already there.  Fai  zan  09:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * technically, it was created today....only the date you moved it to mainspace is counted....not userspace..  TheStrike   Σagle   09:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sarvajna, Can have a review here? I shall be grateful. Fai  zan  09:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I just had a look, something doesn't sound correct "Did you know that estimated lakhs of Biharis stranded in Bangladesh were killed by Bengalis(protests again Biharis pictured) after the Fall of Dhaka??" .-sarvajna (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I do not see the hook in the article, may be I missed it.-sarvajna (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh yes....it doesn't exist...... see my proposed hook above and tell if it looks alright..  TheStrike   Σagle   10:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It does exist now at least. Fai  zan  10:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I just feel that Strike Eagle's hook is better, if at all that would be considered I would suggest that you add "more than 100,000" as the minimum estimated number was 100,000. -sarvajna (talk) 11:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ Now I expect a review. Fai  zan  11:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

List of Thevars
Actually that happen by mistake please dont mind .But Senaithalaivar have relationsip with thevars.Mow I removed that content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragulkalyan (talk • contribs) 11:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem Ragulkalyan. Welcome to Wikipedia. Fai  zan  11:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Sorry about this :(  &#9733; Oliverlyc &#9733;  ✈✈✈  Pop me a message!  13:40, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
JMHamo (talk) 13:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
JMHamo (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Biharis
The article could also talk about rapes carried out by the Mukti Bahini against Bihari people. Some information is available in Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War. Another topic that could be covered is how Biharis don't have voting rights, I think I read that somewhere on the Stranded Pakistanis article.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 13:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah it needs expansion, will improve it after two days after finishing of my exams. Fai  zan  13:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Liaquat Ali Khan and Jinnah's return
People have continuously spammed, in a sense, Liaquat Ali Khan's page by adding that statement that he convinced Jinnah to comeback to India. This statement is completely False and most likely came out of state propaganda which is not what Wikipedia stands for and has no credible sources and no primary sources what so ever (that is why it is never referenced). In reality a Ahmadi man by the name of A. R. Dard spent by the Ahmadi spiritual head. This Article by the PakTeahouse provides many primary sources and Jinnah's own words and is highly recommended read: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nawabmalhi (talk • contribs) 15:48, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm looking into it, thanks! Fai  zan  16:48, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Huggle down (?)
Can you log in with Huggle?  Yinta n  11:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Checked it and I can login. Any problem? Welcome back to Wikipedia. I knew you will not reject. Fai  zan  11:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * For some reason mine won't log in. Very strange.  Yinta n   11:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Get a new version. Fai  zan  11:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with 2.1.20 version. May be problem with the internet connectivity? Fai  zan  11:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Nope, everything else works fine. Web, email, FTP, VoIP, no problems at all. It's definitely a Huggle problem. [scratches head]  Yinta n   11:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cannot get it.  Fai  zan  12:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Are you on a proxy? It could be that. That's why I can't log in at school. You need the proxy settings -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 06:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No proxy. Anyway, the problem is solved although nobody understands really why or how Huggle messed up.Huggle/Feedback  Yinta n   09:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * lol.  Fai  zan  09:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Weird. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 12:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

WTF
Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh, nowhere near for mainspace, you had a good chance of a decent article there, why did you rush it? Darkness Shines (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Eh.. man, Was I an asshole when asked you to improve it or suggest me in the talk? Fai  zan  10:45, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Bogdan Andrei Juratoni
This is his page, not Bogdan Juratoni. Please redirect it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aibbah (talk • contribs) 13:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No way, don't create new articles for already created ones. Do improve the existing ones. And it should be Bogdan Juratoni. Fai  zan  13:43, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!

 * Hey, congrats! That's a lot! Face-smile.svg -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 06:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks NumberManiac! Thanks a lot. Fai  zan  08:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 12:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

I would be more careful
before expanding Minorities in Pakistan in future (perhaps you could help me) and thanks for the strikeout. Let's edit amiably and keep it friendly. Okay? :) Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 16:31, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Hello MrT. I'm really glad you came here. I know you may be fed up of those conflicts, where you have been indulged since a week approximately. Categories for deletion, Articles for deletion, ANI, etc. No one would ever prefer conflicts. And as far as amiability is concerned, we should keep it in mind that if facts support something, that should be cited. If facts support the persecution of Minorities in a country, they should be there in the article. On the other hand, if the facts also support the betterment of the minorities, or the developments in their condition, they should also be there. The version of the article of Minorities in Pakistan developed recently was not according to WP:NPOV. Now, I will certainly aid you there, and then we can carry out other joint projects too. Thanking you once again. Fai  zan  09:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, allow me to say something here about WP:NPOV issue you raised, you're correct it was not ideal, far from it. It was written in a tone that might be perceived as overly censorious, albeit that was not my intention. Having said that, I believe most of the articles below FA/GA standard have some issues with NPOV, whether it's result of an ongoing dispute or not. I am happy that you reaffirmed the stipulation that if reliable sources support a claim, good or bad, that claim should be there in the article. I hope to improve the article further after a few days, I would like you to take charge of the content, I may provide sources on the talk of the draft or the article. I was not that much annoyed with the accusation of Bias in that article per se, but the arbitrary blanket reversal. I would appreciate if you didn't support that bullish attitude. If it can happen to me on this article, it can happen to you as well or anybody for that matter. Let's keep our personal prejudices and biases aside and let the facts speak for themselves. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 11:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I will let you be in charge of the changes, I think it's better to edit it as a separate draft and it will allow us to take approval of most of the editors involved (after we have had our changes). I have done it in past and I would like to collaborate with you there. If you think I have misrepresented something or neglected anything feel free to make the change. I hereby formally hand it over to you for next few days. Make it neutral. I would appreciate if it could be a mutual collaboration between you and I. (At this moment it's very hard for me to navigate through the hurdles) But one condition there will be no "ego" between you and me . We have to leave it at the door. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 11:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Eh... First thing... That I don't have any of the " personal prejudices and biases", and they will never come in my way in Wikipedia. The so-called separate draft is the same previous version of the disputed revision. Anyway, I am glad to work with you. There are few errors there, and I will cite them in the respective talk, and we can fix them. It would be a pleasure to work cooperatively. After the Minorities in Pakistan, we can work in Minorities in India too. I cannot make it neutral alone, and I will need alignment of all the parties. Hope to start work there soon. Fai  zan  13:17, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * "they will never come in my way in Wikipedia" - Thanks. The draft it's up to you. Edit it anyway you like. Delete the errors, biased claims and keep the rest. I am not going to revert you. But we've got to start to trust each other at some point in order to be able to collaborate efficiently. "After the Minorities in Pakistan, we can work in Minorities in India too." —— sure why not? "I cannot make it neutral alone" - I know, but let's keep it between us for at least, then we will move it to the main space and open it for everybody concerned. Acceptable? It's just a precaution, it will give me some time to edit it hassle free. That's all. You know where I stand, Faizan. I trust you and I am willing to collaborate and reach a compromise with you first, then others. Cheers,  Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 15:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Heart-touching words MrT. No problem at all, cooperation would have been the last option otherwise too. Don't worry, the articles would be fine. I will start major re-construction from tomorrow, and we can also get a DYK for the 5x expansion.  Fai  zan  15:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

CellTarget
Hello Faizan, I thought it would be interesting to have a link to an informatics application that uses the Sholl analysis. It was developed at my University — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.39.58.40 (talk) 11:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No you cannot advertise here. Please don't do it. Fai  zan  12:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Oops
Be a little carefull with what you revert back into an article :-)  Yinta n   11:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sometimes it's better to read it. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 12:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It has happened to me, too. I must admit.  Yinta n   12:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Lol, that happens. I will take more care for sure.  Fai  zan  12:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Abdul Malik Baloch
Hi Faizan...I dont think that Mr. Abdul Malik Baloch is bestowed upon any titles. Being a CM doesn't grant any title in its own regard. Please discuss further on the topic's talk page before reverting. Thanks. Najafhaider (talk) 12:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Let me look into it. The Constitution of Pakistan assigns these titles to the honourable ministers. Fai  zan  13:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Move
Hi Faizan, I saw that you moved the article Anti-Bihari sentiment in India to Anti-Bihari sentiment. As it now covers all range of anti-Bihari sentiments regardless of geographical location, I guess it would be appropriate to merge the article Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh with that article.-- Zayeem (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry Zayeem that would be censorship and hiding the fact that Bangladesh is abusing and persecuting Biharis on a daily basis. I think a better idea would be to merge Bangladesh atrocities in 1971 with rape in 1971? 86.151.237.220 (talk) 10:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, there is a heck of difference between sentiment and persecution. Sentiment has a wide meaning, and it may include things from demonstrations, hatred, violence, etc, but the persecution's definition is not fit upon the Sentiment. Fai  zan  10:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi!
Hey faizan, do i know you? Taha Tariq (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * }
 * Does not seem so. A warm welcome to Wikipedia. Fai  zan  14:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

KATY PERRY
when I was reading her wiki page just last week there was she has sold 11 million albums and 75 million digital tracks and this info has been in the page for the last 2 years why you deleted it ????? ??? and I posted a link to ABC news saying she has sold 75 million singles http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2012/06/katy-perry-opens-up-about-new-movie-heartbreak-and-love/

77.44.232.141 (talk) 15:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * You have been already answered here. Please discuss it on the article's talk page. Fai  zan  15:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome back
Wa-alaikum Assalam. Just joined Wikipedia today after a semi-long pause. Glad to hear from you. Congrats on your 10,000 edits. One thing, user User:Anthonyhcole is repeatedly changing lead sentence "Muhammad is almost universally considered..." in Muhammad. If possible, keep an eye. Hope your all-out success. Thanks. -- Ascetic Rosé   17:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Ascetic. Don't worry about that. I will keep an eye. Secondly an RfC at the talk page of Prophet Muhammad maybe of interest to you. Fai  zan  17:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * User:AsceticRose, I am not repeatedly changing that sentence. Also, your edit summary calls my edit vandal-like. That is incorrect too. Do you make a habit of lying about and insulting editors you disagree with? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 17:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Anthonyhcole please don't mind it. But your edits are without consensus. This thing has been discussed earlier at the article's talk. Fai  zan  17:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Anthonyhcole, You did this two times -- on 13 May and 06 June. Also, it is not my personal disagreement. It is according to talkpage discussion. You attempted to change it without any discussion.-- Ascetic Rosé   17:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool it down. Fai  zan  17:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Anthonyhcole, one more thing, my history does not say I make a habit of lying about and insulting editors.-- Ascetic Rosé   17:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * You're right. I apoligise. I'd forgotten about the earlier edit. Sorry. Can you give it some thought, though, please? I think my proposed language is uncontroversial, in that it's not insulting to any people who identify as Muslims. I'm just trying to get a stable article. I can't see why anyone would object to my language, but there are always going to be people who strongly object to the existing language, and all the other proposed wordings on the talk page. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 18:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * There is no such conflict at the article's talk. You are not making it stable, rather you are making it controversial. The current statement was replaced there only after the consensus. Fai  zan  18:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The current language, "Muhammad is almost universally considered by Muslims as the last prophet sent by God for mankind" entails that there are some (few) Muslims who do not believe Muhammad is the last prophet. Are you happy with that consensus wording? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 18:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The consensus was for that statement and we have to accept it anyway. Fai  zan  18:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't see the consensus you see there. But, provided you and AsceticRose are OK with the present wording, stating that one can be a Muslim while not believing Muhammad is the last prophet, then I'll leave it there. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 18:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * There can be a few amendments to it, but currently, it will remain the same. Fai  zan  18:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Anthonyhcole, I also apologize for the wrong-wording edit summary (made with a slumberous head). What you proposed here has some value. "People who identify themselves as Muslims..." can be a solution to the problem created by Ahmadia-related wording. But such phrase like "X who identify themselves as Y" seems very weak & derogatory for the Y community. That's the problem. So, leave it as it is now. thanks.-- Ascetic Rosé   04:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 06:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
-- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 22:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

re: Alex Bailey
The whole "Later career" section is completely wrong - the article is about a different Alex Bailey from the one the "Later career" section refers to. I suggest this is removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.7.90.114 (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You have got it wrong. Your edit is not acceptable, as it included "Alex is commonly known as Mule.". And that's not appropriate, that's why it was reverted. Fai  zan  15:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mirza Adeeb
Hello! Your submission of Mirza Adeeb at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Drmies. Working on it.... Fai  zan  13:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm saddened
I'm really surprised at your message. Instead of undoing the vandal-like change, what else could I do to restore the version agreed by the community. Also, you should have reverted the edit if you have noticed earlier.-- Ascetic Rosé   16:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Confusion, replied at your talk. Get happy again. Fai  zan  16:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your quick response-- ! Ascetic  Rosé   17:16, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * My pleasure Rose! Fai  zan  08:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Persecution of Biharis vandalism
User Armanj has since last night been vandalising the article he keeps removing sourced information and has been trying desperately to state that persecution lasted only during the 1971 war even though the sources completely disagree "The Biharis became subject to widespread political persecution preceding and during the 1971 war as well as in the aftermath of liberation" I think he is unable to read the last part of the sentence or refuses to read it please just revert him on sight whenever he tries to vandalise again thanks. 86.151.237.220 (talk) 08:51, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 09:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Highlights from May 2013
Highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation Report and the Wikimedia engineering report for May 2013, with a selection of other important events from the Wikimedia movement About &middot; Subscribe/unsubscribe &middot; Distributed via Global message delivery, 16:30, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikimedia Foundation highlights
 * Community invited to discuss trademark practices
 * Wikipedia Zero launches in Pakistan
 * Search for new Executive Director begins
 * Data and Trends
 * Financials
 * Other movement highlights
 * More than 11,000 nature photos in Ukrainian "Wiki loves Earth" contest
 * Hackathons in Amsterdam and Tel Aviv
 * Railway photo expedition in Poland
 * Online course about editing Wikipedia articles

PLO, UN, and "sole legitimate representative" versus "the representative"
Please see the discussion on the Palestinian Liberation Organization: Talk:Palestine_Liberation_Organization. I discussed the change well ahead of time, and I was supported in my proposal. You are simply mixing and matching claims: no source claims the UN claims the PLO is the "sole legitimate" representative, and evidence disproves such claim. I have added the relevant quotes to support my claim.

If you still think I am wrong, we can discuss it there, here, on my talk page, or in arbitration. Int21h (talk) 09:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have a huge watchlist and saw the discussion there. Better continue it there. Fai  zan  11:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Urdu wikipedia
Hey do you translate articles in urdu wikipedia. Solomon  7968  13:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do. Any service? Fai  zan  13:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay can you translate The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians. The Muhammadan Period. Solomon  7968  13:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * . Fai  zan  13:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It will be great if you can translate it in Arabic wikipedia also. I guess you know Arabic. And do you know persian? Maximum of the original works are in persian. So it should have a persian wikipedia article. Solomon  7968  13:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I am sure enough Faizan doesn’t know Arabic and Persian so well so as to translate... — Шαмıq ☪   тαʟκ✍ @ 13:34, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah I can do it only in Urdu. Fai  zan  13:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have created the article here, and improving it. Fai  zan  13:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Article created, but I fear that it may not get sufficient views there. Fai  zan  14:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

You can create the article on Syed Ahmed Bukhari in Urdu wikipedia. He does not yet have a English wikipedia article. It is high time someone makes an article on him. Solomon  7968  11:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Fai  zan  11:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you give me the link for it there at Ur.Wiki? Fai  zan  11:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Did you heard of him? But I tried gathering information on him and got exhausted due to extreme scarcity of references of his biography though there are good number of sources on his political connections. Solomon  7968  11:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I did not. I though I could gather some substance from the entry at Urdu Wiki. So do you have a link there? Fai  zan  11:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No wikipedia article (any language) exists on him. So who is Syed Ahmed Bukhari? He is the tenth (present) Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid. He has widespread political connections and etc. etc.. Solomon  7968  11:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, got it. I have started the progress here. Hope to get sufficient substance there. Fai  zan  11:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * More info his ancestry can be directly traced to Muhammad. on the request of Mughal emperor shahjahan the emeperor of samarkhand sent the ancestor of Mr. Bukhari from Bukhara in samarkhand to accept the post of Shahi Imam. Solomon  7968  12:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have added the info there to the article, but we will need references. Fai  zan  12:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have added the Official reference but need some secondary ones. And is Maulana is officially his name or a honorific? Solomon  7968  12:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I will try to find secondary ones, but "Maulana" is always a horrific. Fai  zan  12:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Criteria
hi Faizan. The wikipedia policy WP:VERIFY state that the criteria for inclusion is that material "must clearly support the material as presented in the article". Please bear that in mind in your future edits. References must also be "reliable, third-party, published sources" per wp:rs. The source you used isn't. Thank you. Pass a Method  talk  19:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism
If i do vandalize wikipedia, for how long will i be banned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.253.97.50 (talk) 12:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * At the pace at which you are vandalizing, you may get an indefinite block. Please stop it. Fai  zan  12:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ok i wont do it now :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.253.97.50 (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That's great. I was going to report you otherwise.  Fai  zan  12:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Syed Ahmed Bukhari
What is written in this ? Solomon  7968  13:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It is the board at the mosque I think, which includes the names of all the thirteen Imams on the mosque, just like included in the list in Shahi Imam. Fai  zan  13:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I cannot visualise this. There are only 13 imams till today, all in a family since the time of Shahjahan. Should we not have separate articles for each of them? And what is the Pakistani equivalent of Jama Masjid. I mean the most historically significant mosque in Pakistan. I know about the lahore mosque but is it the most influential? Solomon  7968  14:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * We can have separate articles for them, but if we have the substance which we found for Syed Ahmed Bukhari. Jama Masjid is the same for all over the world. Its meaning is like "A Grand Mosque". In Pakistan, we have them at Khudabad and Sialkot. But the Badshahi mosque is obviously more influential and known. Fai  zan  14:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I checked the article Badshahi Mosque. It does not contains the list of its Imams. Any info? Solomon  7968  15:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * What I could find from the external links was: and .  Fai  zan  15:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Article in Urdu Wikipedia created too. Fai  zan  09:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Surrender
hi faizan, we had our first arguments over the instrument of surrender article, remember? Why can't you people accept the reality of '71 and move on? You should keep the redirect, its a very common term--ArmanJ (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Arman. My concerns on the redirect remain there. It is insignificant, redundant, and therefore unnecessary. It does not tell about the time period of the surrender, and is less likely to be used for a redirect commonly. Fai  zan  14:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It's a very significant term because its more commonly used than the actual technical term, and hence there should be a redirect page. Moreover, its a more standard title for wikipedia, like other military surrender articles.--ArmanJ (talk) 14:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

redirect deletion attempts
Stop all your efforts to get the redirect deleted except for the RFD. Do not remove the RFD tag from the redirect, let it run its course and an uninvolved admin will evaluate the discussion and decide if it should be deleted. Any other tactics to try to get the redirect deleted will be considered disruptive and you may be blocked. GB fan 18:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have already started an RfD. Thanks for your warning. Fai  zan  06:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Why did you withdraw in the first place then? -- Zayeem (talk) 07:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I went for an CSD. But now, the previous record of the RfD has also been restored. Fai  zan  07:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 kashmiri TALK  12:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Potential RFC/U
Because you supported corrective action regarding my improperly-filed ANI about USer:Baboon43's conduct, I am contacting you per Requests_for_comment/User_conduct/Guidance. Would you be interested in endorsing such an RFC/U? You can view the draft at sandbox. If you agree, I grant my consent for you to edit my sandbox as needed in order to make that endorsement apparent. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I had my response here. So now at the Request for comment on the user conduct, am I eligible to endorse it as "Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute."? Fai  zan  08:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * This is where I'm not entirely sure. This is the first time I've tried this so to be safe, it might be better - if you do choose to endorse, as there's no pressure - to stamp under the "Additional users endorsing this cause for concern" section. I don't want to end up improperly filing anything again, you know what I mean? MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure, endorsing it as an additional user. Fai  zan  08:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Buggle
Hi. Any idea why your Huggle didn't add the proper warnings to User talk:117.193.163.233? It appears to be stuck after the first, while we both reverted that IP a number of times. Did you get errors or a crash?  Yinta n  12:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Eh. An unknown error may be there, I got "Failed to retrieve" error while warning him. Fai  zan  12:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hm... annoying. There's still a few bugs in that thing.  Yinta n   12:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Latest change on the "Albanophobia" article
Dear Faizan, I really found your article very well written. The only thing I wanted to change on it was the name "Republic of Macedonia". Being a Greek, it is unacceptable for me to read an article refering to a state named Macedonia. The terms: "Macedonia", "Macedonian people", "Macedonian language" and everything else called "Macedonian" is nothing more than terms refering to the Greek civilization. After all the Republic's name is only constitutionally called "Republic of Macedonia". This state is officially recognised by the United Nations as "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" or "the FYROM" and it is not in any case recognised as the "Republic of Macedonia". If we have to be clear in our articles we have to write everything as it must be written. After all the only thing I did, was to change a dispute name and write the real name of the country, which is official and makes no dispute, since it has been agreed by Greece, the country itself and by the rest of the world's UN states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elias Raptis (talk • contribs) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Elias. I think I had interaction with you before too. I don't own that article. The article's name is "Republic of Macedonia". I think, you should go through the previous thread of discussion. Fai  zan  13:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Elias. We've gone over that many times already and the current name of the article follows WP conventions. More info here and here. Γειά σας,  Yinta n   14:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm BracketBot
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=560298944 your edit] to 2013 Quaid-e-Azam Residency attack may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * File:PKR100REV.jpg|thumb|A 100 rupee note featuring the [[Quaid-e-Azam
 * Thanks, BracketBot. Fai  zan  14:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Signature messed up !
Hey dude my signature sucks how do I sort it out ha ha ! 86.151.237.220 (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

A cookie.


70.181.68.226 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

What kind of cookie would you like? --70.181.68.226 (talk) 01:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!


 * Thank you very much. Fai  zan  05:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much.  Fai  zan  07:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 07:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
 Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Again.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 12:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Read, you got it too.  Fai  zan  12:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your welcome. Baigmirzawaqar (talk) 13:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

A puppy for you!
Thanks for the barnstar..accept this token of appreciation..

 ƬheStrike  Σagle  sorties  14:48, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 
 * Lol, I had expected a puppy instead. Thanks. Fai  zan  14:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅  ƬheStrike  Σagle  sorties  14:58, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Fai zan  14:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 June 17
I am guessing you missed my comment after your vote, from what you have written I am guessing you think the article ought to be restored, if so you need to write "Overturn" not "Endorse". Darkness Shines (talk) 19:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Woah man, sorry. Corrected it. Fai  zan  07:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

ITN credit
ThaddeusB (talk) 23:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)