User talk:Faizhaider/Archive 11

Archive From SEPTEMBER 2010 to DECEMBER 2010

First Delhi Wikipedia Meetup
Hi Faizhaider, I wanted to inform you about the First Wikipedia Delhi meetup being organized on Sept. 22. Please take a look at Meetup/Delhi/Delhi1 for more information and consider attending. --Theo10011 (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, I understand. You might want to consider joining the India Mailing list to keep up to date with any future meets. Regards. --Theo10011 (talk) 11:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And you missed Bangalore meetup19 ( 24Sep 2010) too :) .. Next meetup is on 10 Oct.. Watch WP:MBL for all Bangalore Meetups, we have atleast one meetup per month in Bangalore.. Hoping to meet you soon --  Tinu  Cherian  - 10:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

A bug in a user box?
I think I found and fixed a bug in one of the resolution userboxes. Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, hydrox (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Quote: "UXGA is an abbreviation for Ultra eXtended Graphics Array referring to a standard monitor resolution of 1600×1200 pixels &hellip;" However, the userbox says (quote): "This user contributes at 1680×1050 resolution." But (quote): "WSXGA+ stands for Widescreen Super eXtended Graphics Array Plus and is a computer display standard. [&hellip;] The resolution is 1680×1050 pixels (1,764,000 pixels) &hellip;" See it now? --hydrox (talk) 05:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and same goes to User:Faizhaider/Res 1440x900 btw (corrected) --hydrox (talk) 06:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

a request of friend
Hi brother. I am happy to meet you again. do you remember I wanted you name one indian person in a picure? I uploaded that picture again.

I wanted you name pesons in this picture from left to right. last man is Asadollah Alam. thank you.Gire 3pich2005 (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Suggested changes at MOTD
Hello fellow motto contributor. Discussions arer still open on Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations and still require further input especially on ideas 10-17. Please could you voice your opinion as this is going to be closed in early November. Please help out or even make any new idea suggestions. Simply south (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This is a last call. Any opinions should be suggested by and including November 5th. See Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 2 Simply south (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Uttar Pradesh portal category renames
Hi, Faizhaider. I nominated all the subcategories of Category:Uttar Pradesh portal for a cosmetic change to bring them in line with other portal categories in Category:Portals, as part of a global renaming process that has been happening on Categories for Discussion. You can see the discussion here. Comment if you like. Thanks!--Mike Selinker (talk) 14:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Barabanki
Hi, now that Barabanki is a disambiguation page, per the WP:FIXDABLINKS policy, please help out pointing links from the disambig to articles. Thanks! --Ja Ga talk 23:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

salaam
salaam brother, can we begin to finish this maraji list its good to keep it up to par with editing to allow people to use it corectly we need pictures and also we need to add some new people I cannot do it on my own maybe you wanan show me I dont wana mess up the list —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bachehjonoob (talk • contribs) 04:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Help request
Salaams,

Hoping you could help me out here, and if you know any other users who could help out. ~ Toushiro 「 話 」  01:59, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit Wars-Abrar Ahmed
test —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.68.26 (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Aisha: lede
 Originaly at User talk:HelloAnnyong  As you said on Talk:Aisha that, "I'm not well versed on this subject", I'll try to give you an overview of the case, there are few personalities in early Islam who are little controversial, in general Sunnis have great veneration for them and Shi'is dispute their righteousness by pointing out their acts which are not taken so well by Sunni majority (although even their books are filled by such narrations e.g. Aisha's envolvement in events preceding to murder of third Caliph and then her as leader of Battle of Camel/Basra). Abu Bakar & his daughter Aisha, Umar & his daughter Hafsa, Uthman & his caln Bani Umayya are few of the contentious figures between the two parties. As most of the Sunni Jurispudence is based on the rulings of first three Caliphs and narrations of Hadith from Aisha their being not reghtious & being controversial is not taken well by Sunns and they try to label any such report as fringe, dubious & some time to extent of blasphemy. Ther have been riots and loss of life over these issues from start of Islamic days continuing till today (if you are aware of recent Kuwait & Bahrain fiasco against Shi'is).

Are Shi'a fringe? Yes and no! 10–20% of the world's Muslims are Shi'a, they may number up to 200 million as of 2010. The Shi'a majority countries are Iran, Iraq, Azerbaijan and Bahrain. They constitute 36.3% of entire local population and 38.6% of local Muslim population of Middle East. Shi'a Muslims constitute over 35% of the population in Lebanon, over 45% of the population in Yemen, 20–40% of the population in Kuwait, over 20% in Turkey, 10–20% of the population in Pakistan, and 15–19% of Afghanistan's population. Nations with populations of more than one million Shi'as include (in descending order): Iran, Pakistan, India, Iraq, Turkey, Yemen, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Lebanon, and Tanzania.

For more details: Shi'a–Sunni relations, Persecution of Shia Muslims

Feel free to contact me in case of any question or clarifications.

-- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 04:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha, thanks. That is a very succinct and neutral explanation of what appears to be an exceedingly difficult issue that has caused strife all over the world. More importantly, it reflects well upon you as an editor, and I hope that you stick around and continue to help out on that article. Thanks again for taking the time to write that out. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:36, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I was just wondering about having no response from you over my little essay ;). BTW, we are having great action on Talk:Aisha and little on Aisha. -- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 04:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Ask for a favor
Hi friend. thanks for your contributions on Aisha article. I improved the article by adding more references and its itroduction has now high quality. But as I am busy on another articles, I will be grateful if you keep watching the article against possible vandalism which I am sure will increase after now. Thanks in advance. --Aliwiki (talk) 15:19, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism


A tag has been placed on Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''the article is original research, POV, in bad faith and soapbox. References given are non-verifiable and out of sync to the matter which they are tagged to.''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 09:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Humaliwalay (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Original websites were the Copyrights needed to be obtained from are : Humaliwalay (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * www.ahlebayt.com
 * www.archive.com
 * http://www.northill.demon.co.uk/
 * http://abdurrahman.org/

Notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. The thread is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Suenahrme - Humaliwalay (talk) 11:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

References & holidays
My "real life" is fairly busy from now until the end of the year so I won't be participating as extensively the next 4 weeks, but once the holidays are done I'm intent on improving the references throughout a series of related articles, including Muhammad, Ali, and Aisha. Any resources you have regarding those subjects would be a welcome contribution; in the meantime I'll do what I can to help in bits and pieces, especially on the talkpages. Doc  Tropics  23:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

 Originaly at User talk:Doc Tropics  Thanks! Same case here I'll not be able to give much time to wiki from 10 Dec'10 for three weeks or so, and thats long time for an article. Anyways, happy holidays.-- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 23:59, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, you too! Doc  Tropics  00:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

The Story of the Hungry Goat
You got a good chuckle out of me when I read your suggestion to call the lost verses by that name. However, some of the information actually seems worth including....the fact that Aisha was gathering the reports from people might belong in "After Muhammad's Death" section. As I told Aliwiki also, there is a lot of new material, so feel free to start a new section if you think something is overlooked. Thanks for your contributions, Doc  Tropics  02:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Invite
Hey, i invite you to join the discussion here, Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Islam if u want. Someone65 (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

General Shi'a issues, ANI, etc.
No worries on the ANI. I was slightly miffed that it went to ANI without a post on my Talk, and more that I was being lumped in a guy doing some rather... "extreme" moves (Caliphate? really?). But I understand you meant well by it, no worries.

On a separate note, I have two folks now okay with Shi'a, so I'll stand by for more comment, and then make changes as needed, and if possible get it added to whatever "standardised spelling" list we have. Though probably just having the bulk of articles in one spelling is its own standardisation.

Before you do wander off though, it would be appreciated if you'd go to the Criticism article and weigh back in on the new version. I'm afraid that some of the "Delete" voters are POV pushing, and one seems well-intentioned but doesn't seem easily satisfiable. Having the original proposer weigh back in might be worth something. There is some real difference of opinion between Sunni and Shi'a, with the Sunni being awfully hostile about it at points, so I think it's really a topic worth covering.

Thanks for the comms, hope all going well. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Copyright listing for Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism
Hi. This listing has come due for admin closure, and I have a question for you there. Hopefully, we'll be able to close out that matter soon. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:37, 8 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I think, this discussion is no more relevant, the article we are talking about has been deleted as per an Afd. -- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 02:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you for your response, but there may be some confusion. The article is still present; the AfD has not yet closed. It was relisted by an administrator today and will not close for another five days at least. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know, the confusion has been cleared up: the article was evidently undeleted before I saw your note and the AfD relisted for some reason. So, the article was gone, but it's back now. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Shah family listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shah family. Since you had some involvement with the Shah family redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Hi,

The IP who was edit warring with you in Muslim World a week ago has been identified as a sock of sockmaster Shinas/Anwar Sadaat (since indef blocked). He is now coming back using open proxies to push the same content in the other articles he was edit warring in. I am informing all others who were involved in reverting him and thought i would let you know.--[[User:Sodabottle|Sodabottle (talk) 07:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks! for the info. Can I have more details about this? Do we have an ANI posting for this incidence? -- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 17:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Salam
faiz bhai assalam alaikum, home town fatehpur current city mumbai (atif) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.60.129.73 (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Faizhaider for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. AllahLovesYou (talk) 00:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Spelling Correction Username...
Please correct your Username's spelling in arabic of FAIZ as فيض

Humaliwalay (talk) 07:51, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

/* Christmas mottos */
The motto idea for those between 25th December and mid January needs consensus dtermined badly on which version should be used for which day or even whether the whole idea should be scrapped or postponed. Please help by discussion and determining consensus at WT:Motto of the day/Nominations and Motto of the day/Nominations/Specials. The deadline is Friday at 9pm UTC. Simply south (talk) and their tree 23:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

APPEAL TO YOU
Reg: [BRAHMAN PUJAN], [UNIVERSAL PRAYERS]. written by [Naresh Sonee] On wikipedia, These above two pages are far older than the present article [Brahman] References of above titles are also available on New York site - http://www.printsasia.com/BookDetails.aspx?Id=445813482 Meanwhile, Can your good selves in Wiki Project Indian Community re-create a precise pages on [Naresh Sonee] & his book [Brahmand Pujan] – [Brahmaand Pujan]. However, Sonee is the writer of  this  book  [Brahmand Pujan] written in 1999. registered with Government of India- HRRD. Details of the registration is provided here on http://brhmaandpujanbook.tripod.com/. More than sufficient, news and reviews are there on http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ Since 5-6 yrs, for one or the other reason pages of [Naresh Sonee] & [Brahmand Pujan] are faced by communal bias from outside India  so these articles over and again get deleted here in Wikipedia for minor reasons. However, many hits of - Naresh Sonee reflects on google search engine also. So, I request Wiki Indian community to kindly come forward and generously help these two pages to grow, as I am fed up to fight my case alone here [left] and moved out long back. Meanwhile, such an important info/issue on ‘Indian literature’  which adds & spell  ‘new meaning /dimension’  to Brahman -should it stay lost else ignored? Your community panel has to judge at last. Myself, will not be on Wikipedia, for the same i apologise, but- pls. help these two pages to get reinstalled, reap, sow and grow, if you too feel so, I appeal to do this munificent favour. Regards- Dralansun (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC).