User talk:Fajr18

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code that was emailed to you.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved and ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email! Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Then go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
 * Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
 * Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
 * You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (Your account is now active for 1 year!).
 * If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@undefinedcengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
 * Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
 * Show off your Questia access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Questia email failure: Will resend codes
Sorry for the disruption but apparently the email bot failed. We'll resend the codes this week. (note: If you were notified directly that your email preferences were not enabled, you still need to contact Ocaasi). Cheers, User:Ocaasi 21:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Questia email success: Codes resent
Check your email. Enjoy! Ocaasit &#124; c 21:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata is here; please disable any interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia
Hi!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Going forward, Wikidata will manage interwiki links. Further information: Wikidata/Deployment Questions and .

Important note: Bots that continue to add, remove, or update interwiki links on the English Wikipedia may be blocked from editing after Saturday, February 16, 2013.

If you are running pywikipedia's interwiki.py, please update to 11073 which will automatically prevent your bot from updating links on this wiki.

If you have any questions, please ask at the bot owners' noticeboard. Thank you for your past work maintaining interwiki links. It has been very appreciated and we're looking forward to an even brighter future with Wikidata. Legoktm (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Credo
Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, April 2017
Since you've been inactive since 2013, I've removed you from the subscription list. Feel free to re-add yourself to the newsletter if you become active again though. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

On rolling-back to a previous verison
Hi! I saw where you were cleaning up some recent garbage edits at Ali Mirdrekvandi, and took the liberty of taking care of some other stuff you missed. And I was wondering: are you familiar with how to "rollback" an article to a previous version? As in selecting the desired version, doing a null-edit and save. That's often easier then trying to pick out specific stuff. Especially when someone keeps make a bunch of dubious edits. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Mr. Johnson and thanks for your contributions especially in articles about Ali Mirdrekvandi. I got your notices and in next I'll Include them in my edits on enwiki. Regards — Fajr18 (Talk) 12:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Bot activity on the Dutch Wikipedia
Dear,

Your bot account hasn't made any edits on the Dutch Wikipedia for at least three years. In accordance with the local bot policy the bot flag will be removed in three months. To avoid losing the bot flag, you can confirm you want to retain the bot flag by going to this page.

With kind regards, Kippenvlees1 (talk) 19:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

A dispute
Hey there! Please take a look at the history of the page Lurs. User:Shadegan reverted my edits on that page several times without even writing an edit summary. He insists on some unsourced content which is false. I even left a message on his talk page, suggesting him a way to resolve our dispute, but he also reverted that. I also suggest you to read our discussion on the talk page. I'm asking you to revert his edit on that page if you agree with me. if not, write your opinion on the talk page. I hope you can help end this edit war. Thanks a lot.Taddah (talk) 09:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello dear. I've read the controversies on the talk page (Although I don't have any proficiency in this subject) but obviously you are

completely right. based on my personal wikipedian experiences, i think these type of users on all occasions will continue to Edit warring so I think The most appropriate way is to notify one of the Sysops for Third opinion and other dispute resolutions. regards — Fajr18 (Talk) 20:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, third opinion is exactly what I suggested him on his talk page, but he reverted my message. I think the content is unsourced and false. So, you can revert it yourself. Best regards.Taddah (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Prejudgement
Dear Fajr18, I am an old editor in both English and Farsi wikipedias, mainly concentrated on introduction of Lurish culture which is poorly known and introduced. I have been familiar with you and your works for a long time in Persian wikipedia. I wondered about your answers to user Taddah about my edit history!!!!! Are you sure about me? The user Taddah is trying to do malevolent edits about the Lurish pages. For example if you see the history of the page Lurs, he always has done edits clearly to categorize Luri as a simple dialect of Farsi!! completely in contradiction with the reliable scientific websources like ethnologue etc!! Can you ask him to insert his/her documents about the claims?? As a claimant against an issue he/she have to demonstrate his claims. I anticipate you to be a good mediator. BestSHADEGAN (talk) 15:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello dear friend; In the first place as i said I don't have any specific proficiency in this subject so my suggestion was notify one of the enwiki Sysops for providing an acceptable Third opinion for both sides and other dispute resolutions. In the second Honestly i think both sides should stop their edit waring and wait until reach a reliable conclusion. best regards — Fajr18 (Talk) 17:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Shadegan Unfortunately, you'll never stop your nonsense propaganda. Also, you always digress from the main subject. Perhaps, to distract the user's attention from the main point in which you are obviously wrong. Can you show me where I've done an edit on the page Lures to claim that Luri is a dialect of Farsi?? don't refer to the talk page since you talked about the article itself, and on the talk page I said "in my opinion...". plus this is not science, this is a humanities subject. Do you have a source to prove that in Luri, Lurs are called loral? if not, your edit is original research which should be removed, and I suggest user fajr to do this. Am I right user fajr? Taddah (talk) 08:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)