User talk:Fakeinfo123

August 2020
Hello, I'm AviationFreak. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jats of Azad Kashmir without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AviationFreak 💬 00:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jat Muslim, you may be blocked from editing. ''You cannot use Raj era references for people born later. Also, removing and breaking references should not be done. Especially after they have been reverted once already. See WP:BRD for how to challenge that.'' noq (talk) 22:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

It is not a "raj era reference for people born later". Please read the reference before deleting it. The reference is in relation to the name "Bajwa"- this does not change over time and as a result this was a perfectly valid reference which you should have checked before jumping to your conclusion. In the future please research before making changes, as this does no favours to those that want to improve what little information is currently available. I hope you understand my earlier point about the reference- I had previously included full details about where I got the information from, and this is widely available online. It is from one of the most comprehensive studies into the tribes of Punjab- if you still think the date of its publication is an issue (which it shouldn't be ), I can cite numerous other sources from later.


 * The reference cannot specifically state that individuals born after its publication are Jat or not. Any reference for that must explicitly name the individual. noq (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Unfortunately you are now wasting my time. Both people I added are "Jat Muslim " and you are now preventing correct information from reaching those that wish to find it. Please revert it back to its correct form- and I also suggest that you find an additional reference ( mostly news articles) and add those too. I am giving you some time to correct your mistake by yourself as is only right. If not, I will correct it later on- and will add a few references which "explicitly name the individual" too in order to satisfy those who refuse to comprehend academic sources. On a side note, please do not add "rules " such as: "The reference cannot specifically state that individuals born after its publication are Jat or not. Any reference for that must explicitly name the individual" when they are not applicable in a given situation. Again, this helps no one and hinders academic research.


 * Firstly, The Rose reference has been discredited and is widely reverted when added to wikipedia. Secondly, when making claims about an individual you need a reference that explicitly links that individual to the claim and any source from before they were born cannot do that. Please read WP:verifiability and WP:reliable sources. It is up to you to prove your claim rather than you expecting other editors to do that for you. noq (talk) 09:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Fakeinfo123! Your additions to Jat Muslim have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, likely block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:40, 13 August 2021 (UTC)