User talk:Falcon8765/Archive 1

 ''Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.''

Please help us on the Deletion of Joseph Brant Arseneau
We have worked with Dr. Arseneau and have recorded our work for 4 years on WIkipedia. We did so because we and many people belive it is very notable. To be fair it read very much like a resume 2 years a go but we have been trying to edited to concentrate on the contribution we made by recognizing him. Please let us know what needs to be done. TX —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobuller (talk • contribs)


 * I understand your concern, no worries. Familiarize yourself with WP:N and other policies to have your articles included in the future :). -Falcon8765 (talk) 22:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

We will read the regs, what should we do for now...? Start again? Thank you very much, your's is the first constructive critisim.Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobuller (talk • contribs)


 * Well your article hasn't been deleted yet, that is up to an administrator's discretion. Just look through the welcome message I put on your talk page for hints and guides and such on how to help :); additionally, the page in question itself has links as to why exactly the article is in contention. Welcome again, we all have to start somewhere here! -Falcon8765 (talk) 22:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, we will do our best!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobuller (talk • contribs) 22:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

On.quest
I have updated my contribution (Abdul Ghaffar Junbah) with references. Please advise if it is fine or should I add further references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by On.quest (talk • contribs)
 * That's a step in the right direction, however please familiarize yourself with WP:CITE. :) -Falcon8765 (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

North Korea
I never intended vandalism, that is the new nation slogan for North Korea, directly sourced from Kim Jong-Il, how was it vandalism please explain this to me?

Answer to your answer, actually yes it is, it is one of the best facsmiles of korean, i am korean, are you telling me i'm not korean? - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.137.211.82 (talk • contribs)

I'm having Trouble!
Hi, I just tried to add a reference to the page. Something went wrong and the article was once again deleted. I'm new to Wikipedia, and I'm still learning the ways of the editing page. Would you be willing to insert the cite and reference for me? The reference to the article is "Humongous (Game Developer). This is another Wikipedia page, so a cite may also be added. Thank you.

Please Put the Article Back
Hello, you recently deleted an article I edited on Backyard Baseball 2001. It was right for you to delete it, however it was my fault for forgetting to cite a source. Please put the article back as soon as possible, then let me know. Once I get the message, I will gladly put the cite and references on the page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CirqueDelMar (talk • contribs) 05:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah
I'm actually doing this to see how long it takes to get this computer banned. This is a school computer and I want to get it blocked because there's some super nerd that freaks out when he's banned from Wikipedia. --209.232.112.211 (talk) 20:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

thank you for your reminder. i just think the editor i talked with should know Chinese well. 66.7.131.150 (talk) 22:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: You may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Abce2 | Free Lemonade  Only 25 cents!  23:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Can you point to one piece of vandalism done by me and, if so, tell me why it is vandalism? I'm not a vandal and never have been. Don't make pointless, unexplainable comments on my talk page anymore. 71.225.223.62 (talk) 00:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * That wasn't me though. That edit was done by 173.2.13.19 . That's your vandal. 71.225.223.62 (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. Mistakes happen. It's just that I get accused of this all the time when I never intend to do anything wrong. 71.225.223.62 (talk) 01:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Taiwan vs ROC in sports

 * How about we all talk in one place? Please see Talk:Taiwan_Major_League. Readin (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Not vandalism
The final warning you gave here was not vandalism, as the IP gave a thoughtful summary. I've let a note on the talk page about WP:CENSOR, in which the user has not received any warnings based on that.  Zoo Fari  04:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. I believe the IP is in violation of WP:Autobiography?  Zoo Fari  04:18, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oui, not necessarily vandalism, but repeated reverts of that sourced controversy section while blasting it as "liberal garbage" and such in the edit summaries. -Falcon8765 (talk) 04:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * So then it's a WP:3RR?  Zoo Fari  04:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd say so, yes; if there is an issue with the section, the person could bring it up on the talk page instead of chain reverting. -Falcon8765 (talk) 04:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

TJ Fisher
Take a look at my edit again - I removed a completely unsourced "controversy section" as per BLP guidelines. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 05:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Go for it, say why on the edit summary and talk page though. -Falcon8765 (talk) 05:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Then please remove the warning from my page, with an edit summary stating it was issued in error. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 05:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Paracetamol, NYtimes ref
I have reverted this for 2 reasons.

1. This is not a final FDA regulation but so far only a discussion and opinion of the advisory committee. As such it is not established fact as long as no regulatory action has resulted. Then we can take the FDA guidance as a ref. Now I feel it is too early. They don't imply that the mixture is particularly damaging to the liver, but that it may lead to high dosage and long term use. The other concerns of the committee are similar: Lowering tablet dosage to 325mg and limiting package size like in the UK - also these are only valid concerns and opinions so far, as seen in other countries and their attempt to damage control.

2. As soon as this becomes final regulation, some higher value ref will be available in the form of a FDA released decision. NYtimes is generally not to be used as a medical ref, but such resulting peer reviewed decision or report. I propose to wait until then. It is now too new. The connection of mixtures to liver damage is cloudy in this description. That is why I deleted it until it is final.

Can you reconsider, given these reasons? 70.137.141.26 (talk) 05:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Reasonable enough :), please document your rationale on the article's talk page so others will have a record of it. -Falcon8765 (talk) 05:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

akbar
falcon: outlook magazine link is not accessible. Further we donot know who wrote the article. A professor, a journalist? Who? If a journalist what is the academic background? We cannot insert data without properly citing author etc. Do browse abul fazl's ain e akbari and nowhere it says akbar left the religion of his forefathers. This is malicious propaganda. 192.163.20.232 (talk) 06:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't have any particular opinion on it personally, bring it up on the articles talk page; the article already has several other problems. -Falcon8765 (talk) 06:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Article
I am very sorry, as you can see I am not very good with Wiki using. I just mistakenly put what I wanted to write in the box above, my apologies. However there is an inmortant issue that I need rectifying. I recently made changes to two articles. Ritchie Neville and Emily Scott. The insertion of text from IP address 114.73.156.242 on 28th June 2009 is not the absolute facts. There is a court case regarding this issue pending and until such time this content needs to be removed as it is liable. Please contact me about this issue. I have never edited a wiki profile before so I apologise for not getting it right the first time, I didn't understand how it works. This information however, is not correct and because of the sensitivity of the issue it needs to be removed immediately. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.186.241 (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Expert tag
That was a useful tag. Where does it show up to get an expert for this pitiful article? I would like to see who needs an expert in my area. --69.226.103.13 (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * No idea lol, I'm sure it pops up somewhere though, most of the maitenance tags add article's to specific categories editors can sort through though. -Falcon8765 (talk) 06:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Figures. Here it is. And science articles.  There are some bad articles there!  Hotspot will be in good company.  --69.226.103.13 (talk) 06:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your recent IP report, I was active on the page being vandalized, but only having started days ago I'm a bit slow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) 14:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * :), zoom zoom. -Falcon8765 (talk) 14:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

lol
I don't even know why my talk page is getting vandalized. -Falcon8765 (talk) 20:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)


 * It's the reward for culling vandals :) --  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  21:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Dear Falcon8765
On Paul Lendvai he said it in this hungarian article about being in the ÁVH from 1951 to 1953. Of course for someone it is better to hide this fact as Mr. Lendvai is well known of his critical view on the hungarian right and in general on Hungary, so he needs his "reputation" abroad so he doesn't look like a sadist communist as most of the ÁVH members were.

This is the original hungarian article:

http://www.magyarhirlap.hu/cikk.php?cikk=148953 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.178.124.145 (talk) 01:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
Hi. Please try to be careful with CSD tagging. You just recently tagged Milo Cawthorne and Celebrate (Madonna song) with criteria that clearly did not apply. -- L P  talk 23:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * My apologies :). --Falcon8765 (talk) 23:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Tunnel Hill Road
Hello Falcon8765, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Tunnel Hill Road - a page you tagged - because: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, don't worry about it; you haven't messed up, just a single error. No worries. Regards, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Notability guidelines for Ken Marcus
Hi Falcon, why did you add a notice that Ken Marcus's article might not meet General Notability Guidelines?

He started the soft-focus approach that was so popular for glamour photography during the '70s and '80s; he was almost continuously featured in international glamour magazines through that time; he's done worldwide, corporate-sponsored lectures throughout the world; he was the Artist in Residence at Yosemite National Park; and he's had some pop culture references to boot. Don't those things cover at least some of the criteria for Wikipedia's Notability of Creative Professionals?

Thanks, Erin sinclair (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I tagged it because I wasn't sure if he was notable or not :P, since he is, feel free to remove the tag. --Falcon8765 (talk) 05:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Additionally, more references have been added. --Falcon8765 (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging of North Star Academy (Vista, California)
I removed your speedy deletion tagging of this article as schools are specifically excluded from A7. The criteria states "an article about ... an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools). Per the long held consensus at AfD I've redirected the article to somewhere appropiate.  I notice that there's a couple of other comments about your speedy tagging so can I suggest you review WP:CSD and be a bit more careful with your tagging.  I don't use Twinkle but I'd be surprised if it listed the full criteria in it's interface but as someone doing the tagging you need to be aware of the full criteria and only tag appropiately.  Thanks.  Dpmuk (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Doh, I know that ><, I blame the hour :P. --Falcon8765 (talk) 10:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, we all forget things - it took me a long time to remember to redirect schools rather than prod. I may also have over-reacted a bit due to currently dealing with another user who I fear doesn't really understand the criteria and is using Huggle too readily. Dpmuk (talk) 10:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I can understand, I reread the criteria anyways so I can stop making a fool of myself lol. The yellow bar is a source of dread! -Falcon8765 (talk) 10:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC

List of Deputy Presidents of the Polish Council of State
Hello, Falcon 8765!

I found the names of the Deputy Presidents in the Polish Wikipedia article about the State Council, and it is not allowed to cite Wikipedia as the source. I have, however, found similar information in a Zgapedia article. What is Zgapedia? Is it a Polish version of the Wikipedia or is it independent? Is it reliable? Can you please help me? Thank you very much!

Mbakkel2 (talk) 9:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Michael "Mash" Ashley
Just a fyi on Michael "Mash" Ashley. The article creator placed a hangon tag after you prodded the article. I assume that they really wanted to contest the prod, so I removed both the prod and hangon tag. However, since they didn't give a reason for removing the prod, I sent it to AfD. -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up; I wasn't sure of the article so I tossed a prod :).--Falcon8765 (talk) 03:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Little Rock Village
Hello Falcon8765. You added the tag to a new stub article on Little Rock Village. It's a stub with several relevant (and no irrelevant) article links and references (more than the average stub). While I have no strong feelings on this and am not going to remove the tag, I'm not sure what is unwikilike about it. Beyond making it a non-stub, what specific changes would you make to this stub to better wikify it? Cheers. --Hunnjazal (talk) 04:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * A relevant infobox :). There isn't anything wrong with the article's content itself, but infoboxes help. -Falcon8765 (talk) 04:13, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes. An infobox is a super idea. Thanks! --Hunnjazal (talk) 16:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

G10 - unsourced attacks
Hi, hope you don't mind but as that was a sourced page I've declined the deletion nomination and renamed it Bertram Earl Jones.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  17:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course not :), I wasn't aware that there was another article. -Falcon8765 (talk) 17:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

ATCvet code QI20
Hi Falcon8765! Could you specify in which way this list is unclear, or what sort of explanation should be added to make it clearer for people not knowing about the ATC codes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Removed the tag on further reading. -Falcon8765 (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

IronKey edit
Hi, I was wondering which text exactly the self-published tag you added is referring to on the IronKey page? Thanks! — EndarethTalk–Edits 04:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Wrong template, sorry :). -Falcon8765 (talk) 04:14, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
I note with some amusement you left a vandalism warning on my talk page. I'm rather disturbed by this on two levels, firstly, I didn't vandalize anything; a quick review of my edits to Aaron Gray would show I was trying to revert the vandalism and secondly, warning me two hours after I have edited the page is completely useless, warnings should only ever be made to try and discourage vandalism, drive by warnings are wholly unacceptable for any editors, but in addition to being unacceptable, they are completely and utterly pointless for IP addresses as the IP address could be reassigned by the time you get round to leaving a warning. Don't do it again. 92.13.142.215 (talk) 11:23, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Please note that the diff between the two revisions and  make it appear that you had added an erroneous sentence and then removed it afterwards, with this in mind I left you a general note about editing tests (not exactly a stern warning). I see now that I was not correct and should have further examined the page history; however you should be aware of [WP:CIVIL] and the associated policies. I would be more than happy to rectify my error had I been informed in a non-patronizing manner. -Falcon8765 (talk) 18:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Hi, I asked you a question at your editor review. Feel free to respond (or not to respond) at your leisure. :) '''javért | talk 20:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Articles for deletion/Kudeku
Hi, thanks for doing the AfD nomination. I was about to ask WP:EAR for somebody with an account to do just that, but you got there first! - 91.187.64.57 (talk) 20:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, just patrolling around. -Falcon8765 (talk) 20:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oddly the AfD page is letting me open an edit window, but then won't let me save my !vote for deletion. I tried another AfD and the same thing happened. IPs aren't blocked from editing AfDs, so something odd is going on. Anyway, feel free to copy and paste my text plus sig:"*Delete The article is completely unsourced, and does not explain why it is notable. Google and Google Scholar have zero hits for any independent reliable sources that might confirm any of the purported meanings. It is probably a hoax. - 91.187.64.57 (talk) 21:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)"
 * Thanks for the welcome to WP, though I've been around as an IP on WP for many years. - 91.187.64.57 (talk) 21:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Should get an account then! :P -Falcon8765 (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

With v O'Flanagan
Hi, could I ask in what way the citations in With v O'Flanagan are incorrect? (Aside from it needing a few more in the facts, which I'll get to.)

Thanks, RichsLaw (talk) 22:00, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nothing is blatantly incorrect, it's just a capitalization issue. Just me being a bit anal is all :). See WP:CITE, should have the capitalization guidelines in there somewhere. -Falcon8765 (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Frank Remington
the man had a new york times obituary written about him. theres a building and program built for him at the University of Wisconsin law school. how is he not "important" enough for wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulremington (talk • contribs) 04:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't say he wasn't important enough for Wikipedia; however, there are policies in place to guide article inclusion including WP:COI and WP:NOTE amongst others. If he is as notable as you claim (whether he is or not I don't care an extraordinarily large amount about), then the article won't be deleted and it will be improved upon. -Falcon8765 (talk) 04:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Falcon, a NYTimes obit is considered here as unquestionable proof of notability--did you by any chance read it? the man is not just notable, but famous. . You probably will want to withdraw your nomination. DGG (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I knew he was probably notable, but the COI issue combined with the one reference just made me want to be sure. -Falcon8765 (talk) 08:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

New age
Why are you reverting my contribution on new age article? Parts of the article are quoted from http://thebibleforthenewage.com/ don't see why not including the link in the external links section?


 * Which part of "NoMoreLinks" did you not understand?   — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 22:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If it's referenced in the article, add it as a reference rather than a link. Damn my talk page sure is happening today. -Falcon8765 (talk) 22:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for clarification. I'll add the reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.118.24.22 (talk) 22:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Dimitri Floydorovich Sudayev
Hey, what do you want. I'm the editor of the DFS, your saying it's not true well it is true. according to the NKVD he is one of the few servants of the Romanov. There are many files that are being burned, but few survived including DFS, it is being burn but it is being retrieved by the FSB —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filz Patrick Dureza (talk • contribs) 12:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Jason Porter
This article seems hijacked, don't you check the history of an article before you prod it?

Personally, I think it should just be reversed to it's last good state before the hijacking. (Please don't answer on my talk page, I try not to spend all day here anymore ;-)) Formerly very active, now only occasional editor (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Nikola Srdic
Hello, Falcon8765.

Thank you for informing me about the proposed deletion process for the article about Nikola Srdic.A believe that the article should stay (see References), so I'll remove the proposed deletion tag. However, I agree that the article should be drastically improved, and have already asked some of my colleagues, who are more familiar with Srdic's biography to do that. Best regards, --Andrija (talk) 09:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

thanks...
...for the Cats (in James "Stump" Johnson). Drmies (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You're welcome, just patrolling around. :) -Falcon8765 (talk) 04:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Hi Falcon8765 - I've moved your proposal of the name change of this category to WP:SFD where it belongs. By the way - why wasn't this category proposed for creation at WP:WSS/P? Grutness...wha?  02:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression that stub categories could be speedy created if there were in an upmerged category with more than 60 articles; I see that I misread the wording though. There are like 150+ articles that use that particular template, sorted them lol. -Falcon8765 (talk) 03:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. It does look like a speediable one - though even they are normally listed briefly on the proposal page, just in case someone makes a goof - like missing the word "geography" ;) Grutness...wha?  02:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Lol, I know I sure felt like a moron about 10 seconds after making it. -Falcon8765 (talk) 03:02, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Prod on Dynamic Discount
Dear user,

I thought I'd just drop you a line and let you know that I declined to delete this article, because I don't believe that WP:BOMBARD is a valid reason, by itself, to delete a page, although it could be used to support another argument for deletion. If you still feel this article should be deleted, I'd recommend sending it to Articles for Deletion. Thanks, Mikaey,  Devil's advocate  05:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of St Johns County Public Library System?
This morning, I noted your request to delete our page. Our article is currently a very rough draft and in the process of completion. Thank you for the links to sites that will help me in properly finishing up this article. My concern, however, is your dubbing of our article as possessing a conflict of interest. Can you please explain why and how I can address this issue?

Thank you,

Sjcpls (talk) 15:28, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: AKAI Stereo Cassette Deck
Hello Falcon8765, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of AKAI Stereo Cassette Deck - a page you tagged - because: '''A7 does not even apply here; this is a real product. Please use WP:AFD for these sorts of matters in the future.''' Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW ( Talk ) 01:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Zoran Amar article
Please,

Zoran Amar is not the most famous Yugoslavian director but his is part of very prominent period of Yugoslavian culture during 80's (Emir Kusturica, Marina Abramovic). His film Smeker has cult status in Yugoslavia.

RacoYes (talk) 12:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Then provide references showing how he is notable and passes WP:BIO.Falcon8765 (talk) 12:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Tiara Carolien McLion
Hi, I just deleted this page as a non-notable invidividual rather than as a hoax, as hoaxes need to be really obvious for CSD. Thanks for tagging the page. &mdash;Sean Whitton / 12:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Googled it, absolutely zero hits for the name, thanks though :). -Falcon8765 (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Underground
Wiki is an encyclopaedia surely. To argue notability is subjective. Better to have the knowledge to be able to use, than to make private judgements to delete. Please leave this in. Captainclegg (talk) 13:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't tag the article for deletion, just that it's notability is not clear by it's references. -Falcon8765 (talk) 13:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

I understand, thank you. It is however very notable in the fact that it was Raymond Burrs only appearance in the UK and his last on stage. Captainclegg (talk) 13:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

csd tags
When you remove the csd tag from an article some other editor wrote, remember to remove the hangon tag as well--if the hangon tag is present, the article remains listed for speedy deletion. DGG (talk) 19:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Didn't see it buried at the bottom there. -Falcon8765 (talk) 22:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Christie, Ingraham & Co.
I removed the ProD; please see the talk page. Essentially, it is notable because two of its three partners became PMs. It needs refs. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Charles Boit
Please see my comments at Talk:Charles Boit. --Hegvald (talk) 09:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

John Benjamin Sainsbury
I think it is worthwhile having a Wikipedia article on John Benjamin Sainsbury. He was the second Sainsbury's Chairman, and father of Alan Sainsbury, who was instrumental in changing the way shops are displayed today. He helped grow the company by adding shops to Sainsbury's estate and also maintaining its reputation and market leadership. Unfortunately, there are not that many articles on him, and The Sainsbury Archive is a good reference point.

LRB2000 (talk) 10:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * That there aren't many articles on him probably indicates he isn't notable insofar as Wikipedia policy is concerned :P; if you disagree with the prod feel free to remove it. -Falcon8765 (talk) 12:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Title Oil Refineries
Falcon, don't put that stupid box on top of my refineries article in Canada. You haven't idea about the organisation of oil refineries in Canada. Isn't a subject do you know. Make only you're buisness OK ! This article is in construction. The title is a question of the organisation of oil refineries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredoues (talk • contribs) 05:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

dePRODing of articles
Hello Falcon8765, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:
 * PROD removed from Andrew Devane, by User:Phil Bridger, with summary '(contest prod - seems pretty notable to me)'
 * PROD removed from Irad (Torah), by User:Phil Bridger, with summary '(remove prod tag - anyone mentioned in the Bible is likely enough to have received substantial coverage in reliable sources to mean that the article shouldn't be deleted without discussion at WP:AFD)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Talk of Angels
Did you check for sources before proposing this article for deletion? If a film stars a number of blue-linked actors, particularly well-known ones like Frances McDormand and Penelope Cruz, it's a fair bet that it is going to be notable. It received quite a few reviews, see http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q="Talk+of+Angels"+(Spanish+OR+miramar+OR+"polly+walker"+OR+"vincent+perez"). I'm adding sources now. Fences &amp;  Windows  19:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Ditto Hampton Jazz Festival. It's 40 years old and has 700+ news hits. Fences &amp;  Windows  00:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The articles themselves do not indicate how they are notable. -Falcon8765 (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)