User talk:FalconJackson

How's it going? Welcome to my talk page!

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, FalconJackson! Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —David Levy 23:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you
That was sarcasm too, by the way! GusF (talk) 14:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jacksepticeye, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生] 17:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jacksepticeye, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  LakesideMiners My Talk Page 19:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:FreddieJones.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FreddieJones.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Equine-man. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dougie Poynter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Kermit Roosevelt III
Although Kermit Roosevelt III was born the IVth, the references used in the article clearly indicate that the whole family shifted on his great-grandfather's death. It's been discussed on the article's talk page previously, and I take the consensus there as being that he should be referred to as III. Explaining the numbering shift in the body of the article might be a reasonable thing to do, on the other hand. Note that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for wikipedia articles -- see WP:RS. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * If he was born IVth, it should say that at the top of his article, that tends to be how Wikipedia works... FalconJackson (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The relevant policies are WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NAMECHANGES. Note that birthnames are sometimes not used at all in articles, for example for transgender people who transitioned earlier in life (see WP:DEADNAME); some editors feel very strongly about the latter.  In this case, as I say, it would be completely reasonable to describe his name change, but I don't think it belongs in the lede, certainly not in bold.  I agree that the naming conventions of this branch of the family are especially confusing! Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on PewDiePie. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 20:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.