User talk:Falklorn

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! u p p l a n d 04:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

The Barony von Gloeden
I put a cleanup tag on this article because it didn't confirm to Wikipedia's usual style and formatting preferences (whch is what the tag says). It has nothing ot do with bias. I'm sorry if you misunderstood this. But generally speaking, genealogical articles should focus on those members of a family that are individually notable, and don't really need to list every member. u p p l a n d 04:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The lineage is important because of claims made against the Barony, true or false. Direct lineage for Wilhelm von Gloeden can not be substantiated. The noteables included are connectors for the links of several European royal families. The source book cited (from 1842), which I have translated, is probably the only remaining copy of its kind in the world and the information is not available anywhere else, internet or otherwise. I have removed all of the material since it is not acceptable to Uppland. This is not the kind of user space I thought it was.


 * This has nothing to do with what is acceptable to me personally; the "cleanup" tag is concerned with formatting and style, not content. It has to do with the general and common article formatting guidelines of Wikipedia. But when I mentioned that "genealogical articles should focus on those members of a family that are individually notable", this is based in Wikipedia guidelines and the general consensus which has evolved around here; again, it has nothing to do with my personal preferences. Please read my message above and follow the links in the welcome message above that. u p p l a n d 04:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

The Barony von Gloeden
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article The Barony von Gloeden, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate Image:MacIntosh HD-Desktop Folder-seal.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:MacIntosh HD-Desktop Folder-seal.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:MacIntosh HD-Desktop Folder-seal.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:MacIntosh HD-Desktop Folder-seal.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lutherseal.jpg


The file File:Lutherseal.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)