User talk:Fallacy of the Masses

Welcome!

 * }

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page RationalWiki has been reverted. Your edit here to RationalWiki was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://rationalwiki.org/ (redirect from http://rationalwiki.com)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

RationalWiki
There's been a lot of discussion about this, RW is not notable enough to have its own article, and until that changes, it should remain a redirect to Conservapedia. See Articles for deletion/RationalWiki -- Nx  / talk  17:16, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Conservapedia Main Page 11-20-11.png
Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia Main Page 11-20-11.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Too high detail Conservapedia image
We should not take whole pages from other sites in anywhere like full detail. It can constitute a copyright infringement. The image is only included under fair use, just about enough detail as necessary to give an impression. They can always go to the website to get the full experience. Dmcq (talk) 14:20, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Conservapedia Main Page 11-20-11.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia Main Page 11-20-11.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:30, 23 November 2011 (UTC)