User talk:FallenTabris

May 24
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --OnoremDil 11:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my warning was not needed here. I misread what you had added. I do still believe that it was an unnecessary change to the text. --OnoremDil 11:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Rujiel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 24.22.122.180 09:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

David Vitter
While I don't agree that the earmarking story warrants equal footing with the prostitution scandal, my edit wasn't intended to change your contribution or place it in the reaction section--sorry. I was attempting to remove a chunk of original research from the lead that another editor keeps inserting.--Proper tea is theft 23:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)