User talk:Falongen

June 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gender Justice has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gender Justice was changed by Falongen (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2014-06-23T06:07:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Republican Party (United States)
 * added links pointing to Conservative party, Conservationist and Conservation


 * Green conservatism
 * added links pointing to Conservative party and Conservation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Conservativism
Thank you for your recent edits to the Conservatism article. Your edits were well written and seemed to be correct, but you did not add any references. I have tagged your edited paragraphs with "reference needed" and will likely delete them if no citations are added. Thanks for your help! Magnolia677 (talk) 7:59 am, 6 July 2014, Sunday (13 days ago) (UTC−5)
 * This user is a serial abuser who has possibly committed plagiarism from outside websites into Wikipedia at least once (it bears further scrutiny), and has copied information between articles without attributing its source (Wikipedia content is under the submitter's copyright). So you should check not only for citations but the actual source, besides the fact that the user's submissions to Conservativism were written in a flattering, highly generic, and journalistic tone.  All of the user's submissions which I've found not to be also present on other web sites, are written in broken English. Then the user repeatedly blanked all warnings (including your compliments) from this page, flagrantly defying all warnings and discussion.  It smells of sockpuppetry.  So look out, and good luck to you. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 22:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Land of the free. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''In redirecting this dab page as you did, you are injecting POV into Wikipedia. Please stop.'' – S. Rich (talk) 05:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  10:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page maliciously. Done and undone on countless articles — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 10:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Land_of_the_free&diff=next&oldid=616751047

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. countless politically charged articles — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 10:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Several acts of potential plagiarism, with mass-copied content from foreign web sites. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 10:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Your own writing is dreck, and all the halfway decent text I've looked up is blatantly plagiarized.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crime&diff=615761106&oldid=614376008
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=615801541 comes from http://jspivey.wikispaces.com/file/view/conservatism+liberalism+radicalism.doc

Final warning
I'm receiving complaints about your editing: Please listen to my warning. If you DK not, you will be blocked from editing. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  22:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * You need to add reliable sourcesto your edits, and be careful not to plagiarize others work as well.
 * You need to make sure you're neutral point of view as well, especially when dealing with political/economic topics.
 * Do not blank information without explaining yourself, like in an edit summary or on talk pages.
 * It doesn't appear you're exercising any caution with sensitive political/religious topics, not are you providing edit summaries when blanking pages, so you're blocked for 3 days. Sergecross73   msg me  23:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see below, for your answer. :-/ — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 04:35, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Evening dress
Hello, I have reverted your recent edit where you made Evening dress - a valid disambiguation page for multiple types of formal dress (both male and female) into a redirect to Evening gown. Evening wear should also redirect to this disambiguation page. In this context the term "dress" does not automatically equate with dress as in gown, but describes how a body - male, female, or other - is clad. Looking at some of your recent edit history, many of your redirects are good ones - such as the ones to Hemline but this one is particularly problematic. I would also note that a morning dress describes a specific form of woman's dress, rather than the masculine form of dressing known as the morning suit. I hope that you understand my reasons for reverting the redirect. Mabalu (talk) 03:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, I've had to revert your edits to Hemline - I took a look and you removed text with a citation with uncited text and what appeared to be original research and personal opinion - it read like an essay rather than a summary of published sources with references to those sources. I have just realised that the text was copied directly from File:Hemline (skirt height) overview chart 1805-2005.svg, but that doesn't mean that it can be pasted directly into an article. As a block of unreferenced text, it needs to be supported by references and cites to reliable published sources if used in a Wikipedia article. Please try to support your edits to Wikipedia and please do not remove cited/supported information without either replacing it with better sources or explaining why in the edit summary. Mabalu (talk) 03:43, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. If you check the rest of this page, you'll see that this user is a chronic and blatant and unrepentant abuser along the lines you have described.  Feel free to report.  Good luck reviewing and undoing the damage. Join the club. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 04:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
It looks like you're once again ignoring my warnings, according to the section above, where you're accused of copyright violations, blanking information without explanation, and making a lot of problematic redirect choices. You are blocked again, this time for a week. Sergecross73  msg me  02:01, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * User:Sergecross73: as soon as unblocked, they instantly resumed their bad ways. I've just had to fix several dubious redirects and they also blanked this valid disambiguation page to redirect to a single page. I also spotted this edit which directly overwrote a redirect previously agreed on by consensus. And also and this doozey too which was followed up by creation of the same dodgy redirect with different capitalisation here. I'm also dubious about these United States of Germany/Australia redirects - seems like Falongen just likes mucking around with redirects.Mabalu (talk) 10:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * This is nuts. If there was a way to investigate this person for sockpuppetry, somebody please do it.  There's no way a new Wikipedian creates a new account to suddenly blast the place with hundreds of redirects and flagrantly destructive POV.  Doing all that stuff, including repeatedly blanking this Talk page to ignore all feedback, and ignoring the fact that their abuse is being mass reverted anyway, is just demented. This person needs to leave.  WP:TENDENTIOUS WP:NOTHERE WP:DISRUPTIVE — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 10:33, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

I've already blocked him, for a month this time. This is the last chance. Next one will be an indef block. Please take these warnings seriously, Falongen. Sergecross73  msg me  14:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

United States of India listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United States of India. Since you had some involvement with the United States of India redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 10:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppets
List of alleged sockpuppets:
 * User_talk:Onestance
 * User_talk:Hijuklet
 * User_talk:60.241.116.90
 * User_talk:Kufojut
 * User_talk:Linskon
 * User_talk:Stinjon

United States of Germany listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United States of Germany. Since you had some involvement with the United States of Germany redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Big state listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big state. Since you had some involvement with the Big state redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:03, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Capitalistic democracy listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Capitalistic democracy. Since you had some involvement with the Capitalistic democracy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Visual Capitalist for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Visual Capitalist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Visual Capitalist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. creffett (talk) 00:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)