User talk:False Prophet/Archives/2006/August

RfA Standards
Um, False Prophet, is there some reason you reverted back my changes to my RfA Standards, or was this a simple error? Th ε Halo Θ 00:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

That's quite alright, I put it back up ;) If there's anything I can help you with in the future, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Yours, Th ε Halo Θ 11:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

WoW comment
Yeah it may have been a little premature... maybe 2 or 3 months ago... I wasn't going to leave because of the just wait or more contribs or even the pathetic didn't answer the questions as good as he should (why is that a reason to oppose?). I left because of the We might be admining WoW here comment. And then some people obviously believed it because the last vote on my RfA was oppose per all above. Gang sta  E B help me improve! 11:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Seau - Pats Roster
I understand all the jazz about only posting 'official' information, and am glad to see Seau officially labeled 55 on the template now, but I do take offense at being told my edits 'compromise the integrity of pages'. The NFL official team sites are notoriously slow to update when compared to breaking-news blogs, especially one with the integrity of Mike Reiss'. I believe it fair to invoke Wikipedia standards and rules, which you did earnestly and in truth, but to invoke 'the integrity of pages' was a low blow, and a mark of arrogance. 24.60.119.35 03:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 13:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't spam me!
If you wish to talk to me, send your own messages. Do not send me auto-generated spam. Yakuman 02:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

RfAery
I don't entirely understand the comment on the RfA subpage. Is this for me as I am now, or would this (If passed) "kick in" when I confirmably registered. 68.39.174.238 01:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * "dismissed" as in, voted down, or what? 68.39.174.238 02:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * From what I've heard, its impossible to give an IP powers without granting them to all IPs, so I'm not sure how a this would work... wait untill the software caught up with it? 68.39.174.238 03:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)