User talk:Famespear

Mouawad
As reviewing administrator, I tend to work on articles that seem promotional. This article was originally written by an editor now blocked for repeated promotional editing using multiple accounts. At this point, you are the only ed. working on it further in a substantial way.

Since the article remains highly promotional, I warn you about WP:COI, our policies on conflict of interest. If this is in fact your situation, you ought to only suggest edits on the article's talk page, unless they are simple updatings of fact or typographical errors. I came across this one, and have done some editing.

I have removed two large promotional sections from the article. There remains a long section of some of the diamonds and events connected with them. This needs abridgment, but a brief listing of the famous stones in their possession might be acceptable, In any case, the  illustrations of these belong  in the articles on the diamonds for those articles that have them -- see WP:CAT:Named diamonds, or in the firm's sales catalog,  or web page, not in the page about the firm in an encyclopedia.

What remains to be done is mainly the removal of unsourced opinion and adjectives of praise or quality that can not be referenced directly to references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. I will take another look after a while to see your progress, but if there is done, I'll do it myself.

I particularly warn you against restoring the unencyclopedic material I removed from the article without the prior consensus of uninvolved editors on the article talk page. . DGG ( talk ) 01:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)